Penggunaan Tes dalam Tes Formatif dan Tes Sumatif Use of Tests in Formative and Summative Assessment
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the role of tests in formative and summative evaluation as key components of the Islamic Education learning process. Formative evaluation is carried out during the learning process to monitor students’ progress, provide feedback, and support teachers in adjusting instructional strategies so that learning objectives can be optimally achieved, whereas summative evaluation is conducted at the end of an instructional unit to assess overall learning outcomes and to serve as a basis for academic decision-making, such as graduation or promotion to the next grade. This study employed a literature review method through a theoretical examination of various relevant sources on formative evaluation, summative evaluation, and the use of tests in the context of Islamic Education. The findings indicate that formative and summative evaluation have complementary functions, whereby formative evaluation is oriented toward the learning process, while summative evaluation focuses on learning outcomes. The assessment techniques used also differ according to their respective purposes, including observation, discussion, and self-assessment in formative assessment, as well as written tests, portfolios, and projects in summative assessment. These findings affirm that the appropriate implementation of formative and summative evaluation can enhance the quality of learning, identify students’ strengths and weaknesses, and support more objective and sustainable instructional decision-making within the framework of Kurikulum Merdeka.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the intersection of learning and instruction. Routledge.
Arifin, Z. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Kunandar. (2018). Penilaian Autentik: Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Mulyasa, E. (2021). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/219047/Salinan_Permendikbud_Nomor%2023_Tahun%202016.pdf [Access restricted]
Sani, R. A. (2019). Penilaian Autentik. Bumi Aksara.
Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: The missing link for formative assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802638671
Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.




















