Penggunaan Tes dalam Tes Formatif dan Tes Sumatif Use of Tests in Formative and Summative Assessment

Main Article Content

Sukmayeti Sukmayeti
Ahmad Lahmi
Delmi Masnita
Nurhamidar Nurhamidar
Yessi Wahyuni

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the role of tests in formative and summative evaluation as key components of the Islamic Education learning process. Formative evaluation is carried out during the learning process to monitor students’ progress, provide feedback, and support teachers in adjusting instructional strategies so that learning objectives can be optimally achieved, whereas summative evaluation is conducted at the end of an instructional unit to assess overall learning outcomes and to serve as a basis for academic decision-making, such as graduation or promotion to the next grade. This study employed a literature review method through a theoretical examination of various relevant sources on formative evaluation, summative evaluation, and the use of tests in the context of Islamic Education. The findings indicate that formative and summative evaluation have complementary functions, whereby formative evaluation is oriented toward the learning process, while summative evaluation focuses on learning outcomes. The assessment techniques used also differ according to their respective purposes, including observation, discussion, and self-assessment in formative assessment, as well as written tests, portfolios, and projects in summative assessment. These findings affirm that the appropriate implementation of formative and summative evaluation can enhance the quality of learning, identify students’ strengths and weaknesses, and support more objective and sustainable instructional decision-making within the framework of Kurikulum Merdeka.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Sandy Y.D. (2026)
    Analysis of Using E-Booklet Educational Media to Improve Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Nutritional Needs
    Amerta Nutrition, 10(1), 115-122
  2. Ihsan M.D. (2026)
    The Implications of Using Praat for Intonation-based Pronunciation Assessment of EFL Teachers in Indonesian Classrooms
    Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 26(1), 119-137
  3. Sholihah W. (2025)
    Determining Factors for Long Term Use of Gadget by Preschool Children
    Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 28(3), 172-182

Article Details

How to Cite
Sukmayeti, S., Lahmi, A., Masnita, D., Nurhamidar, N., & Wahyuni, Y. (2026). Penggunaan Tes dalam Tes Formatif dan Tes Sumatif. TSAQOFAH, 6(2), 2201-2210. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i2.8951

References

Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the intersection of learning and instruction. Routledge.

Arifin, Z. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Kunandar. (2018). Penilaian Autentik: Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Mulyasa, E. (2021). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/219047/Salinan_Permendikbud_Nomor%2023_Tahun%202016.pdf [Access restricted]

Sani, R. A. (2019). Penilaian Autentik. Bumi Aksara.

Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: The missing link for formative assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802638671

Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)