Hubungan Pemahaman Teori dan Fasilitas Kerja terhadap Prestasi Praktek Pengefraisan Kelas XI Teknik Permesinan SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang The Relationship Between Theory Understanding and Work Facilities on the Performance of Machining Practice in Class XI of SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2008-2020
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i3.5619
Viewed: 268 times
Downloaded: 134 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Ahmad Rizaldi1, Purwantono Purwantono2, Budi Syahri3, Zainal Abadi4
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relationship between the understanding of milling machining theory and work facilities on the practical performance of eleventh-grade students in the Machining Engineering program at SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang. The method used in this study is quantitative with a correlational approach. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and the distribution of questionnaires, then analyzed using simple regression and multiple regression. The results indicate a positive relationship between the understanding of milling machining theory and practical performance in milling machining, with a correlation coefficient of 0.357. Work facilities also show a positive relationship with practical performance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.242. Additionally, the results of the multiple regression analysis indicate that the understanding of milling machining theory and work facilities together positively relate to practical performance in milling machining, with a correlation coefficient of 0.402. The effective contribution of both variables to practical performance is 16%, with a relative contribution of understanding theory at 11.5% and work facilities at 4.5%. These findings suggest that improving theoretical understanding and providing adequate work facilities can enhance students' practical performance in milling.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Surjawan D.J. (2026)A Smart Management Framework for Higher Education Accreditation Based on the PUDAL Engine and V-Model ApproachAsia Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 15(1), 175-192
-
Delegencia J.J. (2026)Exploring the Influence of AI Learning Tool Use on Academic Performance: A Mediation Analysis of the Role of Learning EngagementAsia Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 15(1), 1-24
-
Khairunnissa N.D.N. (2026)OCCUPATIONAL STRESS, QUALITY OF LIFE AND CARING BEHAVIOUR AMONG INDONESIAN NURSES IN JAPANIndonesian Journal of Health Administration, 14(1), 100-111
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ahmad Khoirul Rizki. (2015). Kesiapan dan Kelayakan Sarana Prasarana SMK N 2 Pengasih Kulon Progo dalam menghadapi pembelajaran kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Skripsi UNY.
Anisah Basleman & Syamsu Mappa. (2011). Teori Belajar Orang Dewasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bernstein Douglas A.(1988). Study Guide Psychology. Dallas: Houghton Mifflin Comp.
Dyah Amiyah Linayani. (2014). Penilaian autentik dalam kurikulum 2013. Diambil dari http : // pendidikan .probolinggokab.go.id/ penerapan- penilaian- autentik-dalam-kurikulum-2013/ pada tanggal 29 desember 2015 pukul 22.00
Fikrotur Rofiah. (2015). “Metode pembelajaran praktikum”. Diambil dari http://www.eurekapendidikan.com/2015/10/metode-pembelajaran- praktikum.html?m=1, pada tanggal 2 November 2015 pukul 10.20 WIB
Hariyanto. (2010). “Pengertian belajar menurut ahli”. Diambil dari http://belajarpsikologi.com/penegertian-belajar-menurut-ahli/,pada tanggal 31 Oktober 2015 pukul 11.03 WIB
Hariyanto. (2010). “Pengertian prestasi belajar”. Diambil dari http://belajarpsikologi.com/penegertian-prestasi-belajar /, pada tanggal 31 Oktober 2015 pukul 11.40 WIB
Leighbody, G. B., and Kidd, D. M. (1968). Methods of teaching shop and technical subyects. New York : Delmar publishers.
Mimin Haryati. (2008). Model & Teknik Penilaian pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
Muh Hifzi.(2015). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar, Fasilitas Belajar, dan Sikap Siswa, terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Thesis (S2). Yogyakarta : UNY.
Nölker, H. & Schoenfeldt, E. (1983). Pendidikan Kejuruan Pengajaran, Kurikulum, Perencanaan. (Alih bahasa: Agus Setiadi). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia
Rinanto Roesman. (1988). Keterampilan Psikomotor. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Sahid Raharjo. (2014). “cara melakukan uji normalitas kolmogorov-smirnov dengan SPSS”. Diambil dari http://www.konsistensi.com/2014/01/uji- normalitas-kolmogrov-smirnov-spss.html?m=1 /, pada tanggal 13 januari 2016 pukul 08.50 WIB
Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. Sukardi. (2011). Statistika Pendidikan untuk Penelitian dan Pengelolaan Lembaga diklat Yogyakarta : Usaha Keluarga
Wisnu, A. (2015). MEA dan Pendidikan yang berkualitas. Diambil dari http://www.kompasiana.com/wisnuandangjaya/mea-dan-pendidikan-yang-berkualitas_55530d2db67e611308130970. pada tanggal3 November 2015 pukul 07.00 WIB