Hubungan Pemahaman Teori dan Fasilitas Kerja terhadap Prestasi Praktek Pengefraisan Kelas XI Teknik Permesinan SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang The Relationship Between Theory Understanding and Work Facilities on the Performance of Machining Practice in Class XI of SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang

Main Article Content

Ahmad Rizaldi
Purwantono Purwantono
Budi Syahri
Zainal Abadi

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between the understanding of milling machining theory and work facilities on the practical performance of eleventh-grade students in the Machining Engineering program at SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang. The method used in this study is quantitative with a correlational approach. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and the distribution of questionnaires, then analyzed using simple regression and multiple regression. The results indicate a positive relationship between the understanding of milling machining theory and practical performance in milling machining, with a correlation coefficient of 0.357. Work facilities also show a positive relationship with practical performance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.242. Additionally, the results of the multiple regression analysis indicate that the understanding of milling machining theory and work facilities together positively relate to practical performance in milling machining, with a correlation coefficient of 0.402. The effective contribution of both variables to practical performance is 16%, with a relative contribution of understanding theory at 11.5% and work facilities at 4.5%. These findings suggest that improving theoretical understanding and providing adequate work facilities can enhance students' practical performance in milling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Khairudin A. (2026)
    (Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of Carbon Nanotube/Manganese Sulfide (CNT/MnS) Composites via Optimization of CNT Content as Electrodes for Supercapattery)
    Sains Malaysiana, 55(5), 848-857
  2. Zawawi A.S.A.A. (2026)
    Syntactic Analysis of Motion Verb Structures in Malay: A Minimalist Approach
    Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 26(2), 335-359
  3. Nuriman M.A. (2026)
    PERFORMANCE OF THE DOUBLE SAMPLING COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION CHART UNDER MEASUREMENT ERRORS USING A LINEAR COVARIATE ERROR MODEL FOR MONITORING NPK FERTILIZER MANUFACTURING PROCESS
    Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 22(1), 173-204

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizaldi, A., Purwantono, P., Syahri, B., & Abadi, Z. (2025). Hubungan Pemahaman Teori dan Fasilitas Kerja terhadap Prestasi Praktek Pengefraisan Kelas XI Teknik Permesinan SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang. TSAQOFAH, 5(3), 2008-2020. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i3.5619

References

Adinda Rachmani. (2015). Ini Cara Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Dorong Peningkatan Kualitas SDM. diambil dari http://bisnis.liputan6.com /read/2379474 /ini- cara-menteri-ketenagakerjaan-dorong-peningkatan-kualitas-sdm . pada tanggal 3 Januari 2016 pukul 09.00 WIB
Ahmad Khoirul Rizki. (2015). Kesiapan dan Kelayakan Sarana Prasarana SMK N 2 Pengasih Kulon Progo dalam menghadapi pembelajaran kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Skripsi UNY.
Anisah Basleman & Syamsu Mappa. (2011). Teori Belajar Orang Dewasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bernstein Douglas A.(1988). Study Guide Psychology. Dallas: Houghton Mifflin Comp.
Dyah Amiyah Linayani. (2014). Penilaian autentik dalam kurikulum 2013. Diambil dari http : // pendidikan .probolinggokab.go.id/ penerapan- penilaian- autentik-dalam-kurikulum-2013/ pada tanggal 29 desember 2015 pukul 22.00
Fikrotur Rofiah. (2015). “Metode pembelajaran praktikum”. Diambil dari http://www.eurekapendidikan.com/2015/10/metode-pembelajaran- praktikum.html?m=1, pada tanggal 2 November 2015 pukul 10.20 WIB
Hariyanto. (2010). “Pengertian belajar menurut ahli”. Diambil dari http://belajarpsikologi.com/penegertian-belajar-menurut-ahli/,pada tanggal 31 Oktober 2015 pukul 11.03 WIB
Hariyanto. (2010). “Pengertian prestasi belajar”. Diambil dari http://belajarpsikologi.com/penegertian-prestasi-belajar /, pada tanggal 31 Oktober 2015 pukul 11.40 WIB
Leighbody, G. B., and Kidd, D. M. (1968). Methods of teaching shop and technical subyects. New York : Delmar publishers.
Mimin Haryati. (2008). Model & Teknik Penilaian pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
Muh Hifzi.(2015). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar, Fasilitas Belajar, dan Sikap Siswa, terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Thesis (S2). Yogyakarta : UNY.
Nölker, H. & Schoenfeldt, E. (1983). Pendidikan Kejuruan Pengajaran, Kurikulum, Perencanaan. (Alih bahasa: Agus Setiadi). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia
Rinanto Roesman. (1988). Keterampilan Psikomotor. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Sahid Raharjo. (2014). “cara melakukan uji normalitas kolmogorov-smirnov dengan SPSS”. Diambil dari http://www.konsistensi.com/2014/01/uji- normalitas-kolmogrov-smirnov-spss.html?m=1 /, pada tanggal 13 januari 2016 pukul 08.50 WIB
Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. Sukardi. (2011). Statistika Pendidikan untuk Penelitian dan Pengelolaan Lembaga diklat Yogyakarta : Usaha Keluarga
Wisnu, A. (2015). MEA dan Pendidikan yang berkualitas. Diambil dari http://www.kompasiana.com/wisnuandangjaya/mea-dan-pendidikan-yang-berkualitas_55530d2db67e611308130970. pada tanggal3 November 2015 pukul 07.00 WIB

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>