Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although the use of instructional aids in Physical Education has been widely discussed, studies that specifically evaluate the effectiveness of traditional, local-wisdom–based instructional aids in enhancing elementary students’ participation and motor skills remain limited, particularly in Barru Regency. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of traditional instructional aids in Physical Education learning at SDN 144 Barru Regency, conducted from November to December 2025. A mixed-methods approach with a descriptive evaluative design was employed, involving 42 participants comprising 2 Physical Education teachers and 40 fourth- and fifth-grade students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation, questionnaires, interviews, and motor skills tests; quantitative data were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests, while qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results showed a significant improvement in students’ motor skills after the use of traditional instructional aids (t = 5.87; p < 0.001) and an increase in the mean participation score from 68.45 to 82.30, with a significance value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). In addition, questionnaire results indicated a 21% increase in learning motivation compared to pre-intervention levels. Qualitative findings reinforced the quantitative results, revealing greater enthusiasm, active engagement, and improved collaboration among students during instruction. The study concludes that traditional instructional aids are effective in improving the quality of Physical Education learning and implies that schools and teachers should optimize local-wisdom–based innovations as a contextual, economical, and sustainable instructional strategy.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 9195.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Allegretti M. (2026)
    miRquad: first-in-class dPCR multiplex TaqMan™ Advanced clinical research assay for microRNA detection in head and neck cancer
    Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, 45(1)
  2. Martins B.N.F.L. (2026)
    An educational intervention for teaching bad news communication in dentistry: A pilot study in Italy
    Journal of Dentistry, 173
  3. Chouari K. (2026)
    Anti-aging, antioxidant, and metabolic regulatory effects of a 3-Hydroxytyrosol-rich Crocus sativus leaf extract in natural and D-galactose-induced aging wistar rats
    Food Bioscience, 83

Article Details

How to Cite
B, M. A. (2026). Studi Evaluatif Pemanfaatan Alat Peraga Tradisional dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani di Sekolah Dasar. MASALIQ, 6(2), 756-770. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v6i2.9195

References

Beni, S., Fletcher, T., & Ní Chróinín, D. (2022). Meaningful experiences in physical education and youth sport: A review of the literature. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1891217

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2021). Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature. Quest, 73(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2020.1868180

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dyson, B., Vickers, K., Turtle, J., Cowan, J., & Tassone, M. (2020). Evaluating physical education programs: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19877249

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hastie, P. A., Calderón, A., Rolim, R. J., & Guarino, A. J. (2019). The development of skill and knowledge during a sport education season of track and field athletics. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 90(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1571670

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kirk, D. (2019). Precarity, critical pedagogy and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 24(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1323200

Luguetti, C., Oliver, K. L., Kirk, D., & Dantas, L. E. (2021). Exploring pedagogies for social justice in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1741532

Ní Chróinín, D., Fletcher, T., & O’Sullivan, M. (2018). Pedagogical principles of meaningful physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1342789

OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en

Opstoel, K., Chapelle, L., Prins, F. J., De Meester, A., Haerens, L., van Tartwijk, J., & De Martelaer, K. (2020). Personal and social development in physical education and sports: A review study. European Physical Education Review, 26(4), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19882054

Shoval, E., & Shulruf, B. (2021). The impact of cooperative learning on physical education achievement. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(3), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0187

Taber, K. S. (2021). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments. Research in Science Education, 51, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09835-5

UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education (QPE): Guidelines for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231101

Wright, P. M., & Craig, M. W. (2020). Tool for assessing responsibility-based education in physical activity contexts. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(3), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0216