Needs-Based English Language Curriculum Innovation for Mechanical Engineering Students at Politeknik Negeri Padang

Main Article Content

Yuliatri Novita
Fitrawati Fitrawati
Yetti Zainil

Abstract

The effectiveness of English curriculum innovation in vocational higher education is largely determined by its alignment with students’ academic and workplace needs, yet empirical studies in Indonesian polytechnic contexts remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the role of needs analysis as the basis for developing the English curriculum for students of the Mechanical Engineering Study Program at Politeknik Negeri Padang. A qualitative approach with a case study design was employed, involving Mechanical Engineering students and English lecturers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through curriculum document analysis, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews, and then analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that students require English language competencies oriented toward the comprehension of technical texts, workplace communication, interpretation of mechanical documents, and basic technical writing, whereas the existing curriculum is still dominated by general English with limited integration of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) components. These findings affirm that systematic needs analysis is a crucial prerequisite for innovating vocational English curricula and provide practical implications for curriculum developers to design learning that is more contextual, relevant, and aligned with the demands of the Mechanical Engineering discipline and the world of work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Novita, Y., Fitrawati, F., & Zainil, Y. (2025). Needs-Based English Language Curriculum Innovation for Mechanical Engineering Students at Politeknik Negeri Padang. MASALIQ, 6(1), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v6i1.8618

References

Aboh, R., & Ononye, C. F. (2019). The discursive mechanisms of Nigerianisms and “trancultured” identities in Mary Specht’s Migratory Animals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.5p.1

Basturkmen, H. (2019). ESP teacher education needs. Language Teaching, 52(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000398

Belcher, D. (2017). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.12.001

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Heinle.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2016). General and specific EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.005

Hyland, K. (2018). English for specific purposes and academic literacy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1449862

Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

Rahman, M. (2015). English for specific purposes (ESP): A holistic review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030104

Rahman, M. M., & Yulia, Y. (2022). English for specific purposes in vocational education: Learners’ needs and curriculum implications. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46532

Richards, J. C. (2017). Curriculum development in language teaching: Past, present, and future (pp. 165–173).

Smoak, R. (2003). What is English for specific purposes? English Teaching Forum, 41(2), 22–27.

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528

Widodo, H. P. (2017). Constructing and negotiating agency in English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684365

Xhaferi, B., & Xhaferi, G. (2019). ESP course design: Needs analysis and syllabus design. SEEU Review, 14(1), 35–48.

Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2020). Language curriculum innovation in higher education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(5), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00491-6

Zhang, Z., & Kim, T. (2021). Needs analysis in ESP curriculum development: Insights from engineering education. System, 99, 102504.


Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:

| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |