Evaluasi dan Penguatan Tata Kelola Sistem Informasi E-Prakerin dengan Framework COBIT 2019: Perspektif Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan Evaluation and Strengthening of E-Prakerin Information System Governance with the COBIT 2019 Framework: From the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence Integration
Main Article Content
Abstract
The E-Prakerin Information System at PT. XYZ serves as the digital backbone for the management of industrial work practice, and therefore requires mature information technology governance as well as readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) integration. This study aimed to evaluate the maturity level of E-Prakerin Information System governance based on the COBIT 2019 framework and to analyze the system’s readiness for AI integration. An evaluative approach was employed, with data collected through interviews, observations, and questionnaires, which were mapped onto the five COBIT 2019 domains: EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, and MEA. The maturity level was calculated using a 0–5 scale. The results show that the average maturity level is at 2.48 (Managed Process), indicating that processes are in place but have not yet been fully documented and measured. Gap analysis reveals the largest shortfalls in the strategic planning (APO) and monitoring (MEA) domains. In addition, K-Means clustering of questionnaire responses successfully grouped stakeholder perceptions into three main segments that serve as the basis for determining improvement priorities. Based on these findings, the study proposes a roadmap for enhancing governance toward level 4 (Quantitatively Managed) and a model for integrating AI features, such as automated document verification and quota prediction, to close existing gaps. This study contributes to the development of a holistic evaluation framework that integrates IT governance auditing with readiness analysis for emerging technologies.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Achmad, A. K. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Aplikasi dalam Bidang Pendidikan. CV. Pena Persada.
Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., M. Ameen, B. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Hasan, M. R. (2022). NLP for automated essay evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.
ISACA. (2019a). COBIT 2019 design guide: Designing an information and technology governance solution. ISACA.
ISACA. (2019b). COBIT 2019 framework: Introduction & methodology. ISACA.
Johnson, T. (2021). Cloud-based information systems for student administration. International Journal of Cloud Computing, 10(2), 155–169.
Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2021). AI-based student admission prediction using SVM. IEEE Access, 9, 15520–15530.
Laksana, K. (2021). Tantangan Keamanan Data pada Sistem Informasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Keamanan Informasi, 12(1), 27–37.
Laurensia, A., Seniwati, E., & Pristyanto, Y. (2025). Transformasi Digital Pengelolaan Metadata Jurnal: Studi Eksperimental Otomasi Entri Data Berbasis OCR. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 9(3), 815–824. https://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/edumatic/article/view/32631
Li, F. (2021). Sentiment and semantic scoring for educational essay assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 109.
Mahmud, S. R. (2022). Implementasi SLA dan KPI pada Sistem Informasi. Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 45–53.
Mohammed, F. (2021). AI governance challenges in higher education. IEEE Technology & Society, 40(3), 45–55.
Nugroho, P. (2021). Evaluasi Keamanan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Cloud. Jurnal Teknologi & Keamanan Siber, 3(4), 55–63.
Park, J. (2022). AI fairness and transparency in education systems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 230–242.
Priyanto, S. (2020). Monitoring dan Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan COBIT. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem, 11(1), 55–66.
Rachman, B. (2020). Pemanfaatan Cloud System dalam Pengelolaan Akademik. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 8(1), 11–20.
Rahman, H., & Prabowo, S. L. (2025). Optimalisasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pendidikan Berbasis Digital untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Layanan Pembelajaran di Era Teknologi. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 349–367. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/36730
Sari, D. (2022). Analisis Kematangan Tata Kelola TI Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan COBIT. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 9(3), 47–55.
Silva, M. (2021). AI in digital student registration systems. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(4), 334–345.
Susanto, B., & Wicaksono, I. (2021). Evaluasi Maturity Level Layanan TI. Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi, 10(3), 188–200.
Tan, K., & Wong, H. (2021). Digital administration efficiency in educational services. Journal of Information Systems Education, 32(2), 141–152.
Tarigan, A., & Hidayat, R. (2021). Evaluasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan COBIT 2019. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 15(2), 120–132.
Wibisono, J. (2022). Audit Teknologi Informasi dengan COBIT 2019. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi & Komputer, 7(2), 77–86.














