Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, prompting the development of new candidate therapeutic agents. Coumarin derivatives have potential anticancer activity, but their pharmacokinetic characteristics, toxicity, and binding affinity for the target receptor require evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the suitability of 11 coumarin derivatives as candidate anticancer agents based on Lipinski’s Rule of Five, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profiles, and binding affinities predicted through molecular docking. The study was conducted in silico through compound screening, docking method validation, and analysis of interactions with the target receptor. Validation by redocking the native ligand to the 3ERT receptor structure yielded an RMSD value of 0.696 Å, supporting the method’s ability to reproduce the native ligand’s binding pose. Of the 11 compounds evaluated, 6 passed screening and underwent further analysis through molecular docking. The analysis showed that suberosin had the best predicted binding affinity among the compounds that passed screening, with an estimated binding free energy (ΔG) of −6.3707 kcal/mol and a predicted inhibition constant (Kᵢ) of 21.4175 μM. Based on the screening and molecular docking results, suberosin is the most promising coumarin derivative candidate among the compounds analyzed. These findings provide a computational basis for prioritizing suberosin for in vitro and in vivo testing as a candidate anticancer agent.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 12250.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Sinthi A.T. (2027)
    Phytochemical analysis and biological activities of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit: An integrated in vitro, in vivo and in silico study
    Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 374(P1)
  2. Han H.J. (2027)
    Glycine supplementation reshapes metabolism and enhances growth and stress tolerance in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
    Food Microbiology, 142
  3. Erratum regarding duplicated references in previously published articles in Volume 6-Volume 9
    Advances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 131-135

Article Details

How to Cite
Wardani, L., & Suryani, O. (2026). Studi In Silico Molekuler Turunan Kumarin sebagai Kandidat Inhibitor ER-α pada Antikanker Payudara. MASALIQ, 6(6), 2939-2951. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v6i6.12250

References

Abdel Ghany, L. M. A., El-Dydamony, N. M., Helwa, A. A., Abdelraouf, S. M., & Abdelnaby, R. M. (2022). Coumarin-acetohydrazide derivatives as novel antiproliferative agents via VEGFR-2/AKT axis inhibition and apoptosis triggering. New Journal of Chemistry, 46, 17394–17409. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ02436E

Annunziata, F., Pinna, C., Dallavalle, S., Tamborini, L., & Pinto, A. (2020). An overview of coumarin as a versatile and readily accessible scaffold with broad-ranging biological activities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134618

Coimbra, J. T. S., Feghali, R., Ribeiro, R. P., Ramos, M. J., & Fernandes, P. A. (2021). The importance of intramolecular hydrogen bonds on the translocation of the small drug piracetam through a lipid bilayer. RSC Advances, 11(2), 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09995c

Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017). SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 42717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717

Guan, L., Yang, H., Cai, Y., Sun, L., Di, P., Li, W., Liu, G., & Tang, Y. (2019). ADMET-score—A comprehensive scoring function for evaluation of chemical drug-likeness. MedChemComm, 10, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8md00472b

Itoh, Y., Nakashima, Y., Tsukamoto, S., Kurohara, T., Suzuki, M., Sakae, Y., Oda, M., Okamoto, Y., & Suzuki, T. (2019). N⁺–C–H···O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36987-9

Koley, M., Han, J., Soloshonok, V. A., Mojumder, S., Javahershenas, R., & Makarem, A. (2024). Latest developments in coumarin-based anticancer agents: Mechanism of action and structure–activity relationship studies. RSC Medicinal Chemistry, 15, 10–54. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MD00511A

La Kilo, A., Aman, L. O., Sabihi, I., & La Kilo, J. (2019). Studi Potensi Pirazolin Tersubstitusi 1-N dari Thiosemicarbazone sebagai Agen Antiamuba melalui Uji In Silico [Study of potential of 1-N-substituted pyrazoline analogues of thiosemicarbazones as antiamoebic agent using in silico screening]. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Research, 7(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.30598/ijcr.2019.7-akr

Lee, M.-H., Ta, G. H., Weng, C.-F., & Leong, M. K. (2020). In silico prediction of intestinal permeability by hierarchical support vector regression. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(10), Article 3582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103582

Levy, D. D., Zeiger, E., Escobar, P. A., Hakura, A., van der Leede, B.-J. M., Kato, M., Moore, M. M., & Sugiyama, K.-I. (2019). Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test). Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 848, Article 403074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.07.004

Makki, A. A., Oubeid, F., Edris, A., Mamoun, R., Yousif, M., Ali, M. B., Mohamed Tom, D., Abbas, A., Ibraheem, W., Alzain, A. A., Osman, W., & Ashour, A. (2026). Computational identification of ERα antagonists derived from natural products for breast cancer treatment. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 6, Article 2681. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262681

Meli, R., Morris, G. M., & Biggin, P. C. (2022). Scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using structure-based deep learning: A review. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2, Article 885983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2022.885983

Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Devasia, T., Mariotto, A. B., Yabroff, K. R., Jemal, A., Kramer, J., & Siegel, R. L. (2022). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 72(5), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21731

Patel, H. K., & Bihani, T. (2018). Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 186, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.12.012

Rawat, A., & Bhaskar, A. V. (2022). Recent advances on anticancer activity of coumarin derivatives. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, 5, Article 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2022.100038

Shiau, A. K., Barstad, D., Loria, P. M., Cheng, L., Kushner, P. J., Agard, D. A., & Greene, G. L. (1998). The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell, 95(7), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81717-1

Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

Venkataraman, M., Rao, G. C., Madavareddi, J. K., & Maddi, S. R. (2025). Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development. ADMET and DMPK, 13(3), Article 2772. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2772

Waks, A. G., & Winer, E. P. (2019). Breast cancer treatment: A review. JAMA, 321(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19323

Zhang, J., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Huang, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Zou, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Computational toxicology in drug discovery: Applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(5), Article bbaf533. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf533