Studi In Silico Molekuler Turunan Kumarin sebagai Kandidat Inhibitor ER-α pada Antikanker Payudara Molecular In Silico Study of Coumarin Derivatives as Candidate ER-α Inhibitors for Breast Cancer Anticancer Activity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, prompting the development of new candidate therapeutic agents. Coumarin derivatives have potential anticancer activity, but their pharmacokinetic characteristics, toxicity, and binding affinity for the target receptor require evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the suitability of 11 coumarin derivatives as candidate anticancer agents based on Lipinski’s Rule of Five, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profiles, and binding affinities predicted through molecular docking. The study was conducted in silico through compound screening, docking method validation, and analysis of interactions with the target receptor. Validation by redocking the native ligand to the 3ERT receptor structure yielded an RMSD value of 0.696 Å, supporting the method’s ability to reproduce the native ligand’s binding pose. Of the 11 compounds evaluated, 6 passed screening and underwent further analysis through molecular docking. The analysis showed that suberosin had the best predicted binding affinity among the compounds that passed screening, with an estimated binding free energy (ΔG) of −6.3707 kcal/mol and a predicted inhibition constant (Kᵢ) of 21.4175 μM. Based on the screening and molecular docking results, suberosin is the most promising coumarin derivative candidate among the compounds analyzed. These findings provide a computational basis for prioritizing suberosin for in vitro and in vivo testing as a candidate anticancer agent.
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Sinthi A.T. (2027)Phytochemical analysis and biological activities of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit: An integrated in vitro, in vivo and in silico studyJournal of Ethnopharmacology, 374(P1)
-
Han H.J. (2027)Glycine supplementation reshapes metabolism and enhances growth and stress tolerance in Lactiplantibacillus plantarumFood Microbiology, 142
-
Erratum regarding duplicated references in previously published articles in Volume 6-Volume 9Advances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 131-135
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abdel Ghany, L. M. A., El-Dydamony, N. M., Helwa, A. A., Abdelraouf, S. M., & Abdelnaby, R. M. (2022). Coumarin-acetohydrazide derivatives as novel antiproliferative agents via VEGFR-2/AKT axis inhibition and apoptosis triggering. New Journal of Chemistry, 46, 17394–17409. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ02436E
Annunziata, F., Pinna, C., Dallavalle, S., Tamborini, L., & Pinto, A. (2020). An overview of coumarin as a versatile and readily accessible scaffold with broad-ranging biological activities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134618
Coimbra, J. T. S., Feghali, R., Ribeiro, R. P., Ramos, M. J., & Fernandes, P. A. (2021). The importance of intramolecular hydrogen bonds on the translocation of the small drug piracetam through a lipid bilayer. RSC Advances, 11(2), 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09995c
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017). SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 42717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717
Guan, L., Yang, H., Cai, Y., Sun, L., Di, P., Li, W., Liu, G., & Tang, Y. (2019). ADMET-score—A comprehensive scoring function for evaluation of chemical drug-likeness. MedChemComm, 10, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8md00472b
Itoh, Y., Nakashima, Y., Tsukamoto, S., Kurohara, T., Suzuki, M., Sakae, Y., Oda, M., Okamoto, Y., & Suzuki, T. (2019). N⁺–C–H···O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36987-9
Koley, M., Han, J., Soloshonok, V. A., Mojumder, S., Javahershenas, R., & Makarem, A. (2024). Latest developments in coumarin-based anticancer agents: Mechanism of action and structure–activity relationship studies. RSC Medicinal Chemistry, 15, 10–54. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MD00511A
La Kilo, A., Aman, L. O., Sabihi, I., & La Kilo, J. (2019). Studi Potensi Pirazolin Tersubstitusi 1-N dari Thiosemicarbazone sebagai Agen Antiamuba melalui Uji In Silico [Study of potential of 1-N-substituted pyrazoline analogues of thiosemicarbazones as antiamoebic agent using in silico screening]. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Research, 7(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.30598/ijcr.2019.7-akr
Lee, M.-H., Ta, G. H., Weng, C.-F., & Leong, M. K. (2020). In silico prediction of intestinal permeability by hierarchical support vector regression. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(10), Article 3582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103582
Levy, D. D., Zeiger, E., Escobar, P. A., Hakura, A., van der Leede, B.-J. M., Kato, M., Moore, M. M., & Sugiyama, K.-I. (2019). Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test). Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 848, Article 403074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.07.004
Makki, A. A., Oubeid, F., Edris, A., Mamoun, R., Yousif, M., Ali, M. B., Mohamed Tom, D., Abbas, A., Ibraheem, W., Alzain, A. A., Osman, W., & Ashour, A. (2026). Computational identification of ERα antagonists derived from natural products for breast cancer treatment. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 6, Article 2681. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262681
Meli, R., Morris, G. M., & Biggin, P. C. (2022). Scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using structure-based deep learning: A review. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2, Article 885983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2022.885983
Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Devasia, T., Mariotto, A. B., Yabroff, K. R., Jemal, A., Kramer, J., & Siegel, R. L. (2022). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 72(5), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21731
Patel, H. K., & Bihani, T. (2018). Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 186, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.12.012
Rawat, A., & Bhaskar, A. V. (2022). Recent advances on anticancer activity of coumarin derivatives. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, 5, Article 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2022.100038
Shiau, A. K., Barstad, D., Loria, P. M., Cheng, L., Kushner, P. J., Agard, D. A., & Greene, G. L. (1998). The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell, 95(7), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81717-1
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Venkataraman, M., Rao, G. C., Madavareddi, J. K., & Maddi, S. R. (2025). Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development. ADMET and DMPK, 13(3), Article 2772. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2772
Waks, A. G., & Winer, E. P. (2019). Breast cancer treatment: A review. JAMA, 321(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19323
Zhang, J., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Huang, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Zou, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Computational toxicology in drug discovery: Applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(5), Article bbaf533. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf533






















