Kriminalisasi Deepfake sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Internasional Baru dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Criminalization of Deepfake as a New Form of International Crime from the Perspective of International Criminal Law

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence technology, particularly deepfake, has transformed the landscape of digital crime because its impact not only harms individuals but also has the potential to disrupt social, political, and international security stability. However, legal regulations that explicitly govern the misuse of deepfake within the framework of international criminal law are still unavailable. This study aims to analyze legal regulation of deepfake from the perspective of international criminal law and to examine the urgency of its criminalization as a new form of international crime. This study used a normative legal method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used included primary legal materials in the form of international legal instruments and secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, and relevant scientific literature. The results showed that legal regulation of deepfake in international criminal law remains indirect and has not provided adequate legal certainty. Deepfake has not yet been recognized as a stand-alone international crime but is still positioned as a means of committing other crimes. This normative gap creates various problems, including difficulties in law enforcement, jurisdictional conflicts, and challenges in proving and attributing perpetrators. The findings of this study confirm that the criminalization of deepfake as a new international crime needs to be considered because of its broad impact on human rights, social stability, and international security. Deepfake meets the criteria as an emerging international crime because it causes significant harm, violates universal values, and requires international cooperation in its handling. Thus, reform of international criminal law that is adaptive to developments in digital technology is needed through the formulation of a specific legal instrument on deepfake to provide legal certainty and effective protection for the international community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Meng H. (2027)
    MSLA-XLS-R: Enhancing hierarchical SSL representations for audio deepfake detection
    Computer Speech and Language, 102
  2. Coţolan D.I. (2027)
    A Hybrid Forensic Investigation Framework: Mobile Malware, Memory Threats, and Deepfake Detection
    Communications in Computer and Information Science, 3013 CCIS, 166-178
  3. Rimon I. (2027)
    Unmasking deepfakes: Leveraging augmentations and features variability for deepfake speech detection
    Computer Speech and Language, 101

Article Details

How to Cite
Hidayat, A. A., & Sary, W. E. (2026). Kriminalisasi Deepfake sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Internasional Baru dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. AHKAM, 5(2), 1418-1434. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9900

References

Ambos, K. (2013). Treatise on international criminal law: Volume 1: Foundations and general part. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199657926.001.0001

Cassese, A. (2018). International criminal law. Oxford University Press.

Chesney, R., & Citron, D. (2019). Deepfakes and the new disinformation war: The coming age of post-truth geopolitics. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 147–155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26798018

Darmawan, M. T., Junaidi, A., & Khaerudin, A. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Deepfake pada Pornografi Anak di Era Artificial Intelligence di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 18(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v18i01.1257

DTrust Team. (2025, June 7). Deepfake & AI voice cloning: Penipuan digital semakin canggih. DTrust. https://resources.dtrust.co.id/blog/deepfake-voice-penipuan-digital/

Human Rights Watch. (2022). Online abuse and digital exploitation report.

Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Koesnaedy, S. Z. A., & Triadi, I. (2025). Tantangan Hukum Militer dalam Era Artificial Intelligence: Dilema Penggunaan Senjata Otonom. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(4), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.6679/4ssekx44

Kusnadi, S. A., & Putri, D. W. S. (2025). Perlindungan Hak Privasi dalam Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Deepfake di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v14i2.2135

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Masood, M., Nawaz, M., Malik, K. M., Javed, A., Irtaza, A., & Malik, H. (2023). Deepfakes generation and detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward. Applied Intelligence, 53(4), 3974–4026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03766-z

Meliana, Y. (2025). Urgensi Formulasi Perlindungan Hukum dan Kepastian Pidana Terhadap Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Deepfake dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1087

Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. John W. Parker and Son.

Mirsky, Y., & Lee, W. (2021). The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425780

Nikolinakos, N. T. (2023). A European approach to excellence and trust: The 2020 White Paper on Artificial Intelligence. In EU policy and legal framework for artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies: The AI Act (pp. 211–280). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27953-9_5

Noviantama, D., & Rahman, A. A. (2024). Deepfake: A review from the victimology perspective. Contemporary Issues in Criminal Law, 1(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.20885/CICL.vol1.iss2.art1

OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence, digital transformation and society. OECD.

Paterson, M., & McDonagh, M. (2018). Data protection in an era of big data: The challenges posed by big personal data. Monash University Law Review, 44(1), 1–31. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MonashULawRw/2018/1.html

Prayoga, H., & Tuasikal, H. (2025). Penyebaran Konten Deepfake Sebagai Tindak Pidana: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Publik di Indonesia. Abdurrauf Law and Sharia, 2(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.70742/arlash.v2i1.194

Putri, S. M. I., Salsabila, N., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Kriminalisasi Penggunaan Deepfake dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik: Tantangan dan Solusi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 6(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v6i2.1453

Sarjito, A. (2024). Hoaks, Disinformasi, dan Ketahanan Nasional: Ancaman Teknologi Informasi dalam Masyarakat Digital Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 6(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v6i2.1547

Siagian, J. P., & Subroto, M. (2024). Perempuan Sebagai Kelompok Rentan. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 10(1), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i1.6940

Soekanto, S. (2016). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RND. Alfabeta.

Suroto, S., & Asman, A. (2021). Ancaman Terhadap Keamanan Informasi oleh Serangan Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) dan Metode Pencegahannya. Zona Komputer: Program Studi Sistem Informasi Universitas Batam, 11(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.37776/zk.v11i1.658

Wafi, M. S., Wisnubroto, A., & Prayudi, Y. (2025). Kejahatan Deepfake Berbasis Artificial Intelligence: Suatu Konsepsi pada Penggunaan Asas Culpabilitas Sebagai Pembaharuan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Reformasi Hukum, 29(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i2.1304