Sengketa Kepegawaian Sekretaris Daerah terhadap Bupati Kabupaten Banjar: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara 34/G/TF/2024 Civil Service Dispute of the Regional Secretary against the Regent of Banjar Regency: Analysis of State Administrative Court Decision 34/G/TF/2024
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2878-2902
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10259
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Muhammad Syaiful1*, Lies Ariany2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although civil service disputes involving the state civil apparatus (ASN) and the application of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) have been widely examined, analysis of ASN performance assessment as an object of dispute over governmental action and legal protection for the position of Regional Secretary in State Administrative Court Decision Number 34/G/TF/2024/PTUN.BJM remains limited. This study aims to analyze the conformity of the actions of the Regent of Banjar Regency in assessing the performance of the Regional Secretary based on the AUPB and to evaluate the legal protection provided by the decision for ASN positional rights. This study employed a normative legal method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials included laws and regulations and State Administrative Court Decision Number 34/G/TF/2024/PTUN.BJM, while secondary legal materials comprised literature and scholarly journals collected through library research and analyzed descriptively and analytically. The results of the study show that the Regent’s action in assigning the performance rating of “Very Poor” did not comply with the principles of the AUPB because it was not based on monitoring, performance dialogue, guidance, feedback, the establishment of a Performance Appraisal Team, or assessment documents that fulfilled formal requirements. The State Administrative Court decision provided legal protection for ASN from arbitrary personnel actions, but it still leaves ambiguity regarding the legal consequences of unsigned assessment documents and the relationship between organizational performance achievement and the individual assessment of senior executive officials. These findings contribute to the development of administrative law scholarship, particularly the application of the AUPB, the merit system, and legal protection for ASN in civil service disputes. The conclusion of the study affirms that compliance with performance assessment procedures and the application of the merit system are prerequisites for objective, professional, transparent, accountable, and equitable civil service governance.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abikusna, R. A. (2019). Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. SOSFILKOM: Jurnal Sosial, Filsafat dan Komunikasi, 13(1), 1–15. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/1929048
Arif, M. F. (2023). Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 6(II), 55–62. https://ejournal.an-nadwah.ac.id/index.php/Siyasah/article/view/583
Artha, W. R. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian. Graha Ilmu.
Azhar, M. (2015). Relevansi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Sistem Penyelenggaraan Administrasi Negara. Notarius, 8(2), 274–286. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/10260
Chairiah, A., S, A., Nugroho, A., & Suhariyanto, A. (2020). Implementasi Sistem Merit pada Aparatur Sipil Negara di Indonesia: The implementation of merit-based system on state civil apparatus in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 16(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i3.704
Daryanto, A. (2007). Merit System dalam Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Civil Service: Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS, 1(2).
Fadli, F. (2023). Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menguji Sikap Diam Pejabat Pemerintahan [Tesis, Universitas Hasanuddin]. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/37402/
Harmaini, H., Antoni, E., & Agustina, R. (2024). Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.70308/adagium.v2i2.44
Hartati, W., Wijaya, S. A., & Bahri, S. Y. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pejabat Administrasi Negara terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang Dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Parlementer: Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik, 1(4), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.62383/parlementer.v1i4.368
Juhartono, J., Ardiansah, A., & Kardaryanto, B. (2025). Netralitas ASN dalam Pemilu: Perspektif Sosiologis di Kabupaten Siak. Nusantara; Journal for Southeast Asian Islamic Studies, 21(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.24014/nusantara.v21i2.37671
Kartina, R., & Krustiyani, A. (2023). Kepegawaian dalam Pemerintah di Indonesia. Damera Press.
Manan, B., & Magnar, K. (2017). Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara. Alumni.
Manumpahi, R. G. (2025). Asas Keterbukaan dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan yang Baik. LEX CRIMEN, 13(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/64109
Maulana, M. I. (2021). Seleksi Merit Sistem PNS Pratama Aparatur Sipil Negara di Pemerintah Provinsi. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 1(9), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v1i9.200
Mujiburohman, D. A. (2022). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. STPN Press.
Muksalmina, M., Thani, S., Yustisi, N., & Tasyukur, T. (2025). Reformasi Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance dan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 164–174. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/531
Naibaho, D. S., Lena, E. F. M., & Maulana, J. (2025). Peran Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) dalam Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Kybernology: Journal of Government Studies, 5(1), 96–112. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/kybernology/article/view/18578
Putusan Nomor 34/G/TF/2024/PTUN.BJM. (2024).
Rahim, A., Aulia, S., Susanti, S., Arifin, M., & Riyadi, S. (2023). Relevansi Asas Kepastian Hukum dalam Sistem Penyelenggaraan Administrasi Negara Indonesia. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(8), 5806–5811. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i8.2575
Saputra, O., & Heliyani. (2024). Analisis Implementasi Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai pada Badan Kepegawaian dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jurnal Ekobistek, 13(3), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.35134/ekobistek.v13i3.808
Sinamo, N. (2010). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jala Permata Aksara.
Sitania, S. B., Salmon, H., & Bakarbessy, A. D. (2023). Kedudukan Kepala Daerah sebagai Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian dalam Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 3(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1200
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sumarto, M. (2017). Welfare regime change in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Social Policy & Administration, 51(6), 940–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12340
Sunggono, B. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Suryanto, A., Suzana, R., & Sudrajat, A. (2021). Antologi Pengembangan Kompetensi ASN: Teori, Kebijakan, dan Praktik. Asosiasi Profesi Widyaiswara Indonesia.
Susanto, S. N. (2020). Metode Perolehan dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(3), 430–441. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/9530
Yuditomo, A. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Putusan PTUN Yogyakarta tentang Sengketa Kepegawaian (Studi Komparasi Perkara No. 10/G/2010/PTUN-YK dalam Perkara Mutasi Guru dengan Perkara No. 06/G/2013/PTUN-YK dalam Perkara Ralat SK Menteri Kehutanan) [Tesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/8780
Zulfikar, G. A., Prasetyo, R. E., & Alamsyah, T. (2026). Pengawasan Penerapan Sistem Merit dalam Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara Berdasarkan Pasal 26 Ayat (2) Huruf D Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 Perpektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan, 13(4), 60–68. https://governance.lkispol.or.id/index.php/description/article/view/782