Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Internasional Mantan Perdana Menteri Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina atas Dugaan Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan International Criminal Responsibility of Former Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina for Alleged Crimes against Humanity
Main Article Content
Abstract
The political crisis and violence in Bangladesh in 2024, which resulted in fatalities and allegations of crimes against humanity, raised legal issues concerning the international criminal responsibility of a head of government. Repressive actions by state authorities, including the use of live ammunition against demonstrators, mass arrests, arbitrary detention, and the shutdown of national internet access, raised questions regarding the international criminal responsibility of Sheikh Hasina as the head of government at the time the events occurred. This study aims to analyze whether the violence in Bangladesh in 2024 fulfilled the elements of crimes against humanity under international criminal law, examine the possibility of Sheikh Hasina’s international criminal responsibility, and assess the validity of the in absentia judgment of the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh from the perspective of international law. This study used a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were obtained through a literature study covering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and were then analyzed qualitatively based on the principles of international criminal law. The results showed that the use of live ammunition, mass arrests, and the nationwide shutdown of internet access fulfilled the elements of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. Sheikh Hasina’s position as the head of government opened the possibility of criminal responsibility under Article 28 of the Rome Statute. However, the judgment rendered in the absence of the accused and accompanied by the death penalty raises serious concerns regarding the fulfillment of fair trial guarantees as regulated in Article 14 of the ICCPR. The conclusion of this study affirms that the prosecution of serious human rights violations must still be accompanied by full respect for the rights of the accused so that substantive and procedural justice can be achieved in a balanced manner.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Ababil A.F.Y. (2026)OPTIMIZATION OF ARIMA RESIDUALS USING LSTM IN STOCK PRICE PREDICTION OF PT MEDCO ENERGI INTERNASIONAL TBKBarekeng, 20(2), 1405-1420
-
Nasution L.A. (2026)The Persistence of Victim Blaming in Child Rape Trials: A Victimological Analysis of the Banjarmasin High Court AcquittalNusantara Journal of Law Studies, 5(1), 61-83
-
Iman M.N. (2026)Sentence Complexity in Indonesian Legal Language: An Analysis of Subject Constituent Structure in KUHP TextsTheory and Practice in Language Studies, 16(2), 576-585
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ambawati, R. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Terdakwa dalam Perspektif Fair Trial Berdasarkan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(1), 45–58.
Amnesty International. (2025). Human rights in Bangladesh. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/bangladesh/report-bangladesh/
Anggreni, I. A. K. N., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pemimpin Negara Terkait dengan Kejahatan Perang dan Upaya Mengadili oleh Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (Studi Kasus Omar Al-Bashir Presiden Sudan). Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 2(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v2i3.28787
Bunga, D. (2018). Terminologi Kejahatan dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i1.440
Ervita, M. (2017). Teori Pertanggungjawaban Komando (Command Responsibility): Studi Kasus Kurt Meyer di Pengadilan Militer Kanada. Jurnal Simbur Cahaya, 24(3), 521–538. https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/simburcahaya/article/view/58
Hasnal, & Tinggi, A. S. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Komando dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berat. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(2), 145–158.
Human Rights Watch. (2025, November 17). Bangladesh: Hasina found guilty of crimes against humanity. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/11/17/bangladesh-hasina-found-guilty-of-crimes-against-humanity
Ichsan, A. P., Setiawan, I. K. A. A., Amin, S. M., Kurniawan, A., & Durrahman, D. (2025). Tantangan dan Peluang Peradilan Pidana Internasional di Era Globalisasi. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(1), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v3i1.191
Karina, V. D. (2025). Dinamika Penegakan Hukum Internasional, Independensi Peradilan, dan Politik dalam Kasus Sheikh Hasina. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v4i2.97
Lamadju, D. A. (2018). Penerapan Yurisdiksi atas Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Lex Administratum, 6(4), 66–73. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v2/index.php/administratum/article/view/24526
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muhammad, F., Sudini, L. P., & Sujana, I. N. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional dalam Kejahatan Perang terhadap Kemanusiaan. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(2), 88–92. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/juprehum/article/view/2381
Nrangwesti, A., Fitriliani, Y., & Notoprayitno, M. I. (2023). Elemen-Elemen Dasar Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan: Basic Elements of Crimes against Humanity. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 11(1), 99–114.
Oktariawan, K. A. (2021). Kewenangan Mahkamah Pidana Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(3), 874–883. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/43099
Pradhana, B. A., Lestarika, D. P., & Sary, W. E. (2025). Tindak Pidana Terorisme sebagai Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 12(5), 81–90. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/64
Salsabila, S. M., & Putri, S. S. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana atas Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional (Studi Kasus Penangkapan Presiden Hissène Habré). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17572867
Situngkir, D. A. (2018). Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Hukum Pidana Internasional. Soumatera Law Review, 1(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i1.3398
Sivakumaran, S. (2012). Command responsibility in irregular groups. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(5), 1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs085
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Triadi, I., & Arafah, Y. A. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Komando dalam Pelanggaran Berat HAM oleh Prajurit Militer. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(10), 141–150. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/1579
Wafiroh, Rahayu, A. M., & Zaenuddin. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Individu dalam Kejahatan Internasional Menurut Statuta Roma. Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(1), 934–942. https://publikasi.ahlalkamal.com/index.php/sinergi/article/view/330


















