Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Internasional Mantan Perdana Menteri Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina atas Dugaan Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan International Criminal Responsibility of Former Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina for Alleged Crimes against Humanity

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The political crisis and violence in Bangladesh in 2024, which resulted in fatalities and allegations of crimes against humanity, raised legal issues concerning the international criminal responsibility of a head of government. Repressive actions by state authorities, including the use of live ammunition against demonstrators, mass arrests, arbitrary detention, and the shutdown of national internet access, raised questions regarding the international criminal responsibility of Sheikh Hasina as the head of government at the time the events occurred. This study aims to analyze whether the violence in Bangladesh in 2024 fulfilled the elements of crimes against humanity under international criminal law, examine the possibility of Sheikh Hasina’s international criminal responsibility, and assess the validity of the in absentia judgment of the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh from the perspective of international law. This study used a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were obtained through a literature study covering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and were then analyzed qualitatively based on the principles of international criminal law. The results showed that the use of live ammunition, mass arrests, and the nationwide shutdown of internet access fulfilled the elements of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. Sheikh Hasina’s position as the head of government opened the possibility of criminal responsibility under Article 28 of the Rome Statute. However, the judgment rendered in the absence of the accused and accompanied by the death penalty raises serious concerns regarding the fulfillment of fair trial guarantees as regulated in Article 14 of the ICCPR. The conclusion of this study affirms that the prosecution of serious human rights violations must still be accompanied by full respect for the rights of the accused so that substantive and procedural justice can be achieved in a balanced manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ababil A.F.Y. (2026)
    OPTIMIZATION OF ARIMA RESIDUALS USING LSTM IN STOCK PRICE PREDICTION OF PT MEDCO ENERGI INTERNASIONAL TBK
    Barekeng, 20(2), 1405-1420
  2. Nasution L.A. (2026)
    The Persistence of Victim Blaming in Child Rape Trials: A Victimological Analysis of the Banjarmasin High Court Acquittal
    Nusantara Journal of Law Studies, 5(1), 61-83
  3. Iman M.N. (2026)
    Sentence Complexity in Indonesian Legal Language: An Analysis of Subject Constituent Structure in KUHP Texts
    Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 16(2), 576-585

Article Details

How to Cite
Sofia, T. F., & Sary, W. E. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Internasional Mantan Perdana Menteri Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina atas Dugaan Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan. AHKAM, 5(2), 1768-1785. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.10108

References

Ambawati, R. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Terdakwa dalam Perspektif Fair Trial Berdasarkan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(1), 45–58.

Amnesty International. (2025). Human rights in Bangladesh. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/bangladesh/report-bangladesh/

Anggreni, I. A. K. N., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pemimpin Negara Terkait dengan Kejahatan Perang dan Upaya Mengadili oleh Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (Studi Kasus Omar Al-Bashir Presiden Sudan). Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 2(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v2i3.28787

Bunga, D. (2018). Terminologi Kejahatan dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i1.440

Ervita, M. (2017). Teori Pertanggungjawaban Komando (Command Responsibility): Studi Kasus Kurt Meyer di Pengadilan Militer Kanada. Jurnal Simbur Cahaya, 24(3), 521–538. https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/simburcahaya/article/view/58

Hasnal, & Tinggi, A. S. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Komando dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berat. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(2), 145–158.

Human Rights Watch. (2025, November 17). Bangladesh: Hasina found guilty of crimes against humanity. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/11/17/bangladesh-hasina-found-guilty-of-crimes-against-humanity

Ichsan, A. P., Setiawan, I. K. A. A., Amin, S. M., Kurniawan, A., & Durrahman, D. (2025). Tantangan dan Peluang Peradilan Pidana Internasional di Era Globalisasi. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(1), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v3i1.191

Karina, V. D. (2025). Dinamika Penegakan Hukum Internasional, Independensi Peradilan, dan Politik dalam Kasus Sheikh Hasina. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v4i2.97

Lamadju, D. A. (2018). Penerapan Yurisdiksi atas Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Lex Administratum, 6(4), 66–73. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v2/index.php/administratum/article/view/24526

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muhammad, F., Sudini, L. P., & Sujana, I. N. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional dalam Kejahatan Perang terhadap Kemanusiaan. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(2), 88–92. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/juprehum/article/view/2381

Nrangwesti, A., Fitriliani, Y., & Notoprayitno, M. I. (2023). Elemen-Elemen Dasar Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan: Basic Elements of Crimes against Humanity. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 11(1), 99–114.

Oktariawan, K. A. (2021). Kewenangan Mahkamah Pidana Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(3), 874–883. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/43099

Pradhana, B. A., Lestarika, D. P., & Sary, W. E. (2025). Tindak Pidana Terorisme sebagai Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 12(5), 81–90. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/64

Salsabila, S. M., & Putri, S. S. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana atas Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional (Studi Kasus Penangkapan Presiden Hissène Habré). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17572867

Situngkir, D. A. (2018). Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Hukum Pidana Internasional. Soumatera Law Review, 1(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i1.3398

Sivakumaran, S. (2012). Command responsibility in irregular groups. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(5), 1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs085

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Triadi, I., & Arafah, Y. A. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Komando dalam Pelanggaran Berat HAM oleh Prajurit Militer. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(10), 141–150. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/1579

Wafiroh, Rahayu, A. M., & Zaenuddin. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Individu dalam Kejahatan Internasional Menurut Statuta Roma. Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(1), 934–942. https://publikasi.ahlalkamal.com/index.php/sinergi/article/view/330