Proporsionalitas Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Usaha Mikro dalam Pelanggaran Informasi Produk Proportionality of Law Enforcement against Micro-Enterprise Actors in Product Information Violations
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2856-2877
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10787
Viewed: 3 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Syahda Hafidz Adzindafa1*, Rachmadi Usman2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although law enforcement against business actors in consumer protection violations has been widely studied, research that specifically discusses the proportionality of law enforcement against micro-enterprise actors for violations of product information obligations from the perspective of economic law remains limited. This study aims to analyze the regulation of product information obligations for micro-enterprise actors and to examine the proportionality of law enforcement against violations of these obligations through Banjarbaru District Court Decision Number 38/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bjb. This study used a qualitative approach with a normative legal research design through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were obtained through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and were then analyzed normatively and qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The results show that the regulation of product information obligations in Law Number 8 of 1999 aims to protect consumer rights, but its application to micro-enterprise actors needs to consider business characteristics and MSME empowerment policies. Law enforcement through criminal instruments against administrative violations, as in the Mama Khas Banjar case, has not fully reflected the principle of proportionality and the principle of ultimum remedium. These findings contribute to the development of studies on consumer protection law, MSME law, and economic law, particularly through strengthening the principle of proportionality in law enforcement against micro-enterprise actors. The conclusion of this study affirms that administrative guidance, education, and gradual supervision should serve as the primary instruments before the application of criminal sanctions. The implications of this study provide a conceptual basis for the government and law enforcement officials in formulating more equitable law enforcement policies, while also opening opportunities for further empirical research on the implementation of the principle of proportionality in handling violations by micro-enterprise actors.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adinda, D., Salam, A., Ramadhan, A., Narendra, A., Anasti, M., & Yanto, J. (2024). Politik Hukum dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v1i1.16
Ananda, S. (2025). Perlindungan Konsumen oleh Produk Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) Tanpa Sertifikasi Halal (Studi Kasus di Wilayah Kelurahan Semanan Kecamatan Kalideres Kota Jakarta Barat) [Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/84918
Andriani, P. (2016). Kepatuhan Hukum Pelaku Usaha Minimarket terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen di Pangkalpinang [Skripsi, Universitas Bangka Belitung]. https://repository.ubb.ac.id/id/eprint/810
Arbani, M. (2025). Aspek Hukum Perlindungan UMKM dalam Penjualan di E-Commerce: Tantangan dan Solusi di Era Digital. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 6(2), 1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v6i2.2115
Baba, A. I. M. (2025). Analisis Kepatuhan Pelaku Usaha terhadap Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17436285
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2008). Law & economics. Pearson/Addison Wesley.
Dwifanty, D. J., Leobisa, J. N., Bernoli, A. A., & Dima, E. T. Y. (2025). Kontribusi UMKM terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia serta Peluang dan Tantangan dalam Era Digitalisasi. Akuntansi dan Ekonomi Pajak: Perspektif Global, 2(3), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.61132/aeppg.v2i3.1357
Erawati, I., Hakim, N., & Mau, H. A. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Usaha Mikro dan Kecil terhadap Pelanggaran Ketentuan Pelabelan Produk Pangan. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 3055–3066. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4831
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bina Ilmu.
Haswar, A. M. (2025, May 7). Penyebab Tutupnya Toko Mama Khas Banjar, karena Produk Kedaluwarsa? Kompas.com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2025/05/08/055000478/penyebab-tutupnya-toko-mama-khas-banjar-karena-produk-kedaluwarsa-
Indrawati, Y. (2014). Economic analysis of law (EAL) atas Ketentuan Pasal 2 Huruf G UU No. 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara. Dalam Aktualisasi Hukum Keuangan Publik. Mujahid Press.
Janah, M., & Kusumo, A. T. S. (2026). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku UMKM yang Tidak Mencantumkan Tanggal Kedaluwarsa pada Produk Makanan Kemasan. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 5(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5338
K, K. E. A., Almanisa, S., & Natalia, L. C. (2023). Konsep dan Karakteristik Penegakan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(19), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8404581
Kaplele, F., Mambaya, M., & Tanati, D. (2026). Penguatan Kepatuhan Hukum UMKM melalui Edukasi NIB, PIRT, dan Sertifikasi Halal. Jurnal Pengabdian UMKM, 5(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.36448/jpu.v5i1.108
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2025, January 30). Pemerintah Dorong UMKM Naik Kelas, Tingkatkan Kontribusi terhadap Ekspor Indonesia. https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/6152/pemerintah-dorong-umkm-naik-kelas-tingkatkan-kontribusi-terhadap-ekspor-indonesia
Kennedy, A. (2024). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Keadilan Bermartabat: Perbandingan Teori dan Realitas di Indonesia. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 4(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.31933/ejpp.v4i1.1043
Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2022). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Sinar Grafika.
Marciano, A. (2013). Law and economics: A reader. Routledge.
Meilani, A. N., Nugraha, H. A., Pane, S. N., Maulidia, I., & Tambunan, A. K. (2025). Peran UMKM Jasa dalam Mendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Lokal. PENG: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2(2), 2672–2678. https://doi.org/10.62710/w5v66g38
Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2015). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Rajawali Pers.
Posner, R. A. (1973). Economic analysis of law. Little, Brown and Company. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/books/77
Purnama, M. A., Ratnasari, D., Sakilah, T., & Ikhfadullah, T. (2026). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana di Indonesia. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 2(1), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v2i1.954
Quintarti, M. A. L. (2024). Bentuk-Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(8), 3161–3167. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i8.5995
Ramadhan, D. R., Ramadhani, S., & Rambe, R. (2025). UMKM: Definisi, Karakteristik, dan Kontribusi Ekonomi. Ekonom: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(3), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.58432/ekonom.v5i3.1688
Ridhani, F. (2025, May 1). Mama Khas Banjar Resmi Ditutup Per 1 Mei 2025, Pemiliknya Ketakutan Setelah Sang Suami Ditangkap Polisi, Terpukul secara Mental dan Finansial. Radar Banjarmasin. https://radarbanjarmasin.jawapos.com/hukum-peristiwa/1975950623/mama-khas-banjar-resmi-ditutup-per-1-mei-2025-pemiliknya-ketakutan-setelah-sang-suami-ditangkap-polisi-terpukul-secara-mental-dan-finansial
Sembiring, A. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Hak-Hak Konsumen terhadap Tindakan Pelaku Usaha yang Merugikan Konsumen di Platform E-Commerce Kota Jambi [Skripsi, Universitas Jambi]. https://repository.unja.ac.id/79006
Setiawan, D., Juna, A. M., Fadillah, M. S., Oktarianda, S., Zulkarnen, Z., Rizal, A., & Satrio, I. (2024). Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana di Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.144
Siswohadi, & Hasanah, N. A. (2026). Implementasi Prinsip Etika Bisnis pada UMKM: Kajian Kualitatif terhadap Perilaku dan Pengambilan Keputusan Pelaku Usaha. Musytari: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Ekonomi, 25(6), 931–940. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/musytari/article/view/10002
Sugianto, F. S. (2017). Economic Analysis to Law Seri Analisis Ke-Ekonomian tentang Hukum, Seri 1 Pengantar. Prenada Media.
Sunarso, S. (2022). Viktimologi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Wati, D. L., Septianingsih, V., Khoeruddin, W., & Al-Qorni, Z. Q. (2024). Peranan UMKM (Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah) dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 3(1), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.61930/jebmak.v3i1.576
Zakiri, M. F. (2025, May 14). Polemik Kasus Mama Khas Banjar: Menteri UMKM Hadiri Sidang, Akademisi Bilang Ini Momentum. Radar Banjarmasin. https://radarbanjarmasin.jawapos.com/hukum-peristiwa/2505140020/polemik-kasus-mama-khas-banjar-menteri-umkm-hadiri-sidang-akademisi-bilang-ini-momentum