Efficacy of Accommodation Strategies for Students with Disabilities in Undergraduate Exit Exams: A Systematic Literature Review
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
743-754
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijhess.v3i2.6162
Viewed: 291 times
Downloaded: 163 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Samson Worku Teshome1*
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Exit exams in higher education function as critical evaluative tools to verify that students satisfy academic criteria prior to graduation. However, the integration of disability accommodations within these assessments remains insufficiently explored, raising concerns about equity and accessibility. This systematic review synthesizes current literature on the intersection of exit exams and disability, focusing on the challenges, strategies, and outcomes experienced by students with disabilities. Employing the PRISMA framework, 31 studies were analyzed, uncovering notable gaps in standardized accommodations and limited evidence regarding the long-term impacts of these exams on students with disabilities. While individualized accommodations, such as extended time, alternative formats, and flexible scheduling demonstrate potential to enhance fairness, systemic barriers persist, including inconsistent implementation and resource constraints. The review emphasizes the application of universal design principles to develop inclusive assessments that serve all students. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of educator training and policy reforms to mitigate disparities. Key findings indicate that although accommodations improve immediate exam performance, their effects on long-term academic and career outcomes warrant further investigation. This study contributes to advancing educational equity by providing actionable recommendations for policymakers, educators, and researchers aimed at fostering more inclusive assessment practices.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Wu Y. (2027)Strategies of Designing High-Efficiency Electrolyte Additives for Aqueous Magnesium Batteries: A ReviewNano Micro Letters, 19(1)
-
Irawati R. (2027)Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education contextMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
-
Naemi Z. (2027)The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing CurriculumLanguage Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ackeren, I. V., Block, R., & Klein, E. D. (2012). The impact of statewide exit exams: A descriptive case study of three German states with differing low-stakes exam regimes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(8), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n8.2012
Adale, M. Y., & Kefale, K. B. (2023). A review on implementation challenges and measures of exit exam to enhance and assure the quality of engineering education at Ethiopia HEIs. Journal of Higher Education Research, 8(5), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20230806.13
Al Ahmad, M., Al Marzouqi, A. H., & Hussien, M. (2014). Exit exam as academic performance indicator. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 13(3), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644378
Aniley, A. A. (2023). Comprehensive review on exit examination strategies and its role for enhancement of quality assurance and employability opportunity in engineering and technology programs. IETE Journal of Education, 64 (1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2022.2118874
Aristeidou, M., Cross, S., Rossade, K.-D., Wood, C., Rees, T., & Paci, P. (2024). Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students' acceptance and satisfaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12888
Athiworakun, C., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2022). Investigating washback effects on teaching: A case study of an exit examination at the higher education level. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 777–800. http://so04.tci-thaijo.org
Ayenew, E., & Yohannes, A. G. (2022). Assessing higher education exit exam in Ethiopia: Practices, challenges and prospects. Science Journal of Education, 10(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221002.15
Baker, D. (2019). Pathways to racial equality in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Research Journal, 56(5), 1861–1895. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12438
Benner, A. (2023). Exit examinations, peer academic climate, and adolescents' developmental outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSP.2012.09.001
Bishop, J. (1999). Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6, 349–398. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75286
Bracey, G. (2009). Mandatory exit exams discourage graduation: Research does not support political claims. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100315
Christina, R., & Moorthy, S. (2021). Multiple entry and exit options: Enhancing inclusivity in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2020-0095
Dehury, R. K. (2017). Exit exams for medical graduates: Ensuring quality in healthcare education. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 14(3), 194–198. Retrieved from https://ijme.in/articles/exit-exams-for-medical-graduates-ensuring-quality-in-healthcare-education/
Dempster, F. N. (2012). Comparison of exit exams in Africa: Implications for policy and practice. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1086/666332
El-Hussan, M., Al-Mahrouqi, R., & Al-Bulushi, S. (2021). Student perception of exit exams: A survey study. Higher Education Studies, 11(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n3p123
Fanjoy, R. O., Young, J. P., & Dillman, B. G. (2005). Exit Exams for College Flight Programs: Redundant Activity or Certification of Competency? The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 23(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100333
French, L. (2023). Benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes exams: A global perspective. Journal of Educational Research, 116(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2022.2133278
Hughes, W. (2001). University-industry partnerships: Aligning exit exams with workforce needs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 6(3), 5–22. Retrieved from https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1597
Houchensen, C. (2023). Culturally relevant exit exams: Promoting equity in assessment. Multicultural Education, 26(1), 14–22. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1343877.pdf
Khan, S., Ahmed, M., & Khan, A. (2023). Pharmacy exit exams in India: Improving pharmacy practice through standardized assessments. *Pharmacy Practice, 21(2), 1–10. Retrieved from https://www.pharmacypractice.org/index.php/pp/article/view/22216
Leigh, J. (2012). The power of exit slips: Enhancing student learning through formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.009
Merki, D. (2011). Effects of exit exams on self-regulated learning: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 738–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.08.006
Palmer, B., Devine, P., & Pitts, M. (2010). Modified essay questions in exit exams: Increasing fairness and accessibility. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903411959
Pioplunink, H. (2013). Central school exit exams and labor-market outcomes: Evidence from Europe. Economics of Education Review, 34, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.02.001
Rosqvist, H., Virtanen, T., & Kauppinen, M. (2022). Instruments used in nursing exit exams: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 109, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104975
Siddiqui, M., Alam, K., & Kumar, R. (2020). Role of pharmacy exit exams in improving pharmacy practice: A review. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, 12(1), S47–S51. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_155_19
Slomp, D., DeLuca, C., & Carless, D. (2020). Consequences of medium-stakes exit exams: A review of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100845
Teshome, S. W. (2024). The Positive and Negative Effects of Exit Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajeit.20240802.14
University of Munich & Woessmann, L. (2018). Central exit exams improve student outcomes: Evidence from Germany. Economics of Education Review, 66, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.07.003
Warren, J., & Grodsky, E. (2009). Exit exams harm students who fail them: Evidence from California. Sociology of Education, 82(4), 350–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070908200403
Weir, C. (2010). Pretest/posttest assessment in exit exams: Measuring learning outcomes effectively. Language Testing, 27(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210366414
World Health Organization. (2021). World report on disability. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034931