Influence of Electronic Monitoring and Evaluation on Administrative Decision-Making in the Educational Sector
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
187-201
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijemt.v3i1.4785
Viewed: 296 times
Downloaded: 178 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Salihu Kasimu1, Ladan Maijama'a2, Idi Hamisu3, Abdulkadir Abubakar4*
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the essential role of Electronic Monitoring and Evaluation (EMAE) in enhancing the elementary education sector. EMAE frameworks offer systematic methodologies for assessing educational programs, fostering accountability, and facilitating data-driven decision-making. This research serves as a case study of the primary education authority in Bauchi Local Government, with a particular focus on their teachers. According to the 2023 Annual School Census, there are 4,226 staff members, from which 367 were sampled using the Yamane formula. The sampling frame was stratified to reach the target respondents effectively. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire comprised of closed-ended questions that were designed and validated, achieving a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.83. Based on 358 completed questionnaires, the responses were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings emphasize how effective EMAE practices can lead to improved educational outcomes by identifying successful teaching strategies and fostering continuous enhancement. Additionally, the involvement of diverse stakeholders—including educators, parents, and community members—strengthens collaboration and ensures that educational reforms remain relevant and sustainable. The results highlight the significance of EMAE in aligning national education systems with global standards, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ultimately, this research underscores that robust EMAE practices are essential for cultivating an effective, responsive, and equitable educational environment, ensuring that all students receive a quality education.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Lukpanov R.E. (2027)Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall BlockKompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
-
Mussin R.A. (2027)Redistribution of rock pressure and deformation of the rock mass in the Karaganda coal basinKompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 36-48
-
Thu T.T.T. (2027)Management accounting effectiveness in tourism enterprises: The roles of technology readiness, information technology infrastructure, and data quality in an ai-driven business environmentMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2020). Real-World evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Estrella, M., & Gaventa, J. (1998). Who counts? The role of participatory monitoring and evaluation in empowering citizens. IDS Policy Briefing, 8, 1-4.
Global Partnership for Education (GPE). (2021). GPE results report. Retrieved from https://www.globalpartnership.org
Johnson, K., et al. (2019). Understanding the role of organizational culture in the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation systems. Evaluation and Program Planning, 72, 1-9.
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank.
Patton, M. Q. (2017). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Porter, C., & Goldman, I. (2013). The role of monitoring and evaluation in decision-making: A review of the literature. Evaluation, 19(3), 237-252.
UNDP. (2019). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for results. United Nations Development Programme.
UNICEF. (2019). School feeding programs: A global perspective. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org
UNICEF. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation in education: A guide for practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org
UNESCO. (2019). Gender disparities in education: A global report. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: Monitoring progress towards SDG 4. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org
World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank Publications.
World Bank. (2018). Learning to realize education's promise. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org
World Bank. (2020). Improving teacher performance: A global perspective. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org
USAID. (2021). Early-grade literacy: A review of evidence and best practices. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov