Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

In Nepal, child labor is still a major problem that is fueled by ingrained societal norms, limited educational opportunities, and economic hardship. This study examines how microfinance might be used to address the underlying reasons of child labor in order to decrease it. In order to raise household income, lessen economic vulnerability, and enhance access to education, microfinance institutions (MFIs) provide financial services such microloans, savings accounts, and insurance products. Microfinance and child labor, however, have a complicated relationship with both beneficial and detrimental effects. Microfinance can help reduce poverty and the need for child labor, but it can also unintentionally make child labor more in demand in family-run businesses. This study investigates how microfinance affects household income, educational opportunities, and awareness-raising initiatives in Nepal by drawing on case studies and current literature. According to the research, microfinance can considerably lower child labor if financial products are properly planned and executed and paired with more extensive socioeconomic initiatives. Developing kid-sensitive financial products, incorporating awareness programs, and working with governmental and non-governmental organizations to address the root causes of child labor are some of the main recommendations. In the end, microfinance can be a potent instrument in building a future where all Nepali children have the chance to learn, develop, and prosper, even while it cannot end child labor on its own.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 5038.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Altybayeva D.K. (2028)
    Deep Copper Recovery from Autogenous Smelting Slags under Strongly Reducing Conditions
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 345(2), 16-28
  2. Liu Q. (2027)
    Elucidating the Respective Roles of Photochemical and Photothermal Effects in Photocatalytic Methanol Decomposition
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  3. Berkinbayev G.D. (2028)
    Radioactivity as a prospecting indicator of rare earth, gold and polymetal deposits in eastern Kazakhstan and an indicator of increased radioecological hazard during their development
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 346(3), 40-51

Article Details

How to Cite
Karna, P. K. L. (2025). The Role of Microfinance in Reducing Child Labour in Nepal. Asian Journal of Early Childhood and Elementary Education, 3(2), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajecee.v3i2.5038

References

Al Amana. (2006). Etude d’Impact: Evaluation de la contribution de l’offre de micro-crédit d’Al Amana au développement des conditions des micro-entrepreneurs. from http://www.alamana.org/services-clients/impact1.htm
Beegle, K., Dehejia, R. H., & Gatti, R. (2003). Child labor, income shocks, and access to credit (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3075). World Bank.
Bhalotra, S., & Heady, C. (2003). Child labor: The wealth paradox. World Bank Economic Review, 17(2), 197-227.
Blume, J., & Breyer, J. (2011). Microfinance and child labour. Geneva: ILO.
Botero, C. (2006). Demand-side financing of education: What role for microfinance? Institute for Financial Management and Research.
Dehejia, R. H., & Gatti, R. (2002). Child labour: The role of income variability and access to credit across countries (NBER Working Paper No. 9018).
Edmonds, E. V., & Pavcnik, N. (2005). Child labour in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 40(1), 77-99.
Guarcello, L., Mealli, F., & Rosati, F. C. (2003). Household vulnerability and child labour: The effect of shocks, credit rationing and insurance. World Bank.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2011). Microfinance and child labour (Employment Working Paper No. 89).
Khandker, S. R. (1998). Fighting poverty with microcredit. Oxford University Press.
Menon, N. (2005). The effect of investment credit on children’s schooling: Evidence from Pakistan (Mimeo, Brandeis University).
Morduch, J. (1998). Does microfinance really help the poor? Evidence from flagship programs in Bangladesh (Draft, Hoover Institution, Stanford University).
Wydick, B. (1999). The effect of microenterprise lending on child schooling in Guatemala. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(4), 853-869.

Most read articles by the same author(s)