Main Article Content


Abstract

Students’ learning problems are a complex phenomenon encompassing cognitive, affective, and spiritual dimensions, whereas conventional educational psychology approaches tend to emphasize cognitive and behavioral aspects, resulting in suboptimal integration of value-based and spiritual dimensions. This article aims to analyze the role of the Islamic Educational Psychology approach in addressing students’ learning problems through the integration of psychological, pedagogical, and Islamic value dimensions. The study employed a qualitative method with a systematic literature review approach of primary sources, including reputable journal articles, academic books, and scholarly works relevant to Islamic Educational Psychology. Data analysis techniques involved data reduction, thematic categorization, and conceptual synthesis. The findings indicate that the Islamic Educational Psychology approach can provide comprehensive solutions to students’ learning problems by strengthening intrinsic motivation, developing spiritual intelligence, cultivating moral character, and fostering humanistic educational relationships between educators and students. The study concludes that the Islamic Educational Psychology approach makes a significant contribution to creating a holistic and meaningful learning process, with implications for the importance of integrating Islamic Educational Psychology into instructional practices and educational policies to sustainably improve students’ learning quality.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 8788.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ding S. (2027)
    Digital Renewal of University Education: Barriers, Opportunities, and Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 229-240
  2. Trisnowati E. (2027)
    Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Research Skill Development (RSD) in Science Education in Higher Education: A Delphi-Based Model
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 253-268
  3. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252

Article Details

How to Cite
Wauran, M. P. A., & Rolhimah, S. (2026). Pendekatan Psikologi Pendidikan Islam dalam Mengatasi Problematika Belajar Siswa. TSAQOFAH, 6(2), 2049-2058. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i2.8788

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Access restricted]

Langgulung, H. (2012). Psikologi Pendidikan Islam. Pustaka Al-Husna

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications

Mujib, A., & Mudzakir, J. (2019). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Kencana

Nasution, S. (2018). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya