Teori Identitas Sosial dalam Konteks Media Sosial: Systematic Literature Review tentang Pembentukan In-group dan Out-group di Era Digital Social Identity Theory in the Context of Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review on the Formation of In-Groups and Out-Groups in the Digital Era

Main Article Content

Hanifah Alya Mu’adzah

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of in-group and out-group formation on social media from the perspective of Social Identity Theory, employing a systematic literature review approach. Literature searches were conducted in the Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for publications from 2019 to 2025. Of the 309 articles initially identified, 10 met the inclusion criteria after a screening process using the PRISMA protocol. The analysis shows that in-group formation is facilitated by platform algorithms, virtual community features, and social identification processes reinforced by online interactions, whereas out-group formation occurs through mechanisms of social comparison, stereotypes strengthened by echo chambers, and intergroup competition. In the digital era, social identity appears more flexible and dynamic than in offline contexts, with social media acting as a catalyst that accelerates processes of group categorization and polarization. These findings have important implications for understanding social polarization and online radicalization, as well as for developing digital literacy-based intervention strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of social identity dynamics in virtual spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mu’adzah, H. A. (2025). Teori Identitas Sosial dalam Konteks Media Sosial: Systematic Literature Review tentang Pembentukan In-group dan Out-group di Era Digital. TSAQOFAH, 6(2), 1679-1690. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i2.8610

References

Amit, A., & Venzhik, E. (2025). Morality, social inclusion, and in-group superiority: The differential role of individualizing and binding foundations in perceptions of the social identity of in-group and out-group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(12), 2571–2585. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241262367
Bian, J., Li, L., Xia, X., & Fu, X. (2020). Effects of the presence and behavior of in-group and out-group strangers on moral hypocrisy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 551625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551625
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=voeQ-8CASacC
Kandul, S., & Lanz, B. (2021). Public good provision, in-group cooperation and out-group descriptive norms: A lab experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 85, 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102382
Kyrychenko, Y., Brik, T., van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024). Social identity correlates of social media engagement before and after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Nature Communications, 15, 8127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52179-8
Lin, H. C., & Bruning, P. F. (2020). Comparing consumers’ in-group-favor and out-group-animosity processes within sports sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 791–824. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2018-0195
Lüders, A., Dinkelberg, A., & Quayle, M. (2022). Becoming “us” in digital spaces: How online users creatively and strategically exploit social media affordances to build up social identity. Acta Psychologica, 228, 103643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103643
Ma, R., Cherian, J., Tsai, W.-H., Sial, M. S., Hou, L., & Álvarez-Otero, S. (2021). The relationship of corporate social responsibility on digital platforms, electronic word-of-mouth, and consumer-company identification: An application of social identity theory. Sustainability, 13(9), 4700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094700
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Science & Business Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=nFFDBAAAQBAJ
Schuchart, C., Glock, S., & Dunkake, I. (2021). The influence of in-group and out-group favouritism on the disciplinary practice of ethnic majority and minority preservice teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 24(3), 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09627-w
Uysal, M. S., Akfırat, S. A., & Cakal, H. (2022). The social identity perspective of social media leadership in collective action participation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 32(6), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2502
Vives, M. L., Cikara, M., & FeldmanHall, O. (2022). Following your group or your morals? The in-group promotes immoral behavior while the out-group buffers against it. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001217

Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:

| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |