Perilaku Prososial dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Tinjauan Psikologi Sosial Prosocial Behavior in a Multicultural Society: A Social Psychological Review

Main Article Content

Fanya Puspita Sari
Neviyarni Neviyarni

Abstract

Multicultural society is a social reality characterized by cultural, ethnic, religious, and social value diversity, which has the potential to become both a source of strength and a source of conflict if not properly managed. In this context, prosocial behavior plays an important role in building harmonious social relations and strengthening social cohesion between groups. This study aimed to examine prosocial behavior in multicultural society from a social psychology perspective using a literature review approach. A qualitative method was employed by analyzing and synthesizing various national and international scholarly articles relevant to prosocial behavior, empathy, social identity, social norms, cultural values, and intergroup contact. The findings show that prosocial behavior in multicultural societies is influenced by the complex interaction of empathy, social identity, social norms, cultural values, and the intensity of intergroup contact. Empathy functions as a primary psychological mechanism that motivates individuals to help and cooperate across group boundaries, while inclusive social identity expands prosocial behavior from the in-group to the out-group. In addition, positive intergroup contact and multicultural norms that support tolerance and social justice have been shown to reduce prejudice and increase prosocial behavior. This review emphasizes that strengthening empathy, inclusive values, and multicultural education constitutes a key strategy for building harmony and social cohesion amid societal diversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Rather B.A. (2027)
    POPULATION DYNAMICS, AVOIDABLE YIELD LOSS ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF MUSTARD APHID LIPAPHIS ERYSIMI (KALTENBACH) ON BROWN SARSON (BRASSICA RAPA L.)
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1)
  2. Chano J. (2027)
    Lesson Study and School as a Learning Community to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Definition, Literature Review, and Bibliometric Mapping
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 153-170
  3. Artina F. (2027)
    Digital Literacy through a Web-Based Application: Addressing Polarization and Promoting Social Integration among Islamic Senior High School Students
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 51-66

Article Details

How to Cite
Sari, F. P., & Neviyarni, N. (2025). Perilaku Prososial dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Tinjauan Psikologi Sosial. TSAQOFAH, 6(1), 943-951. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8425

References

Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2005). Social psychology (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press.
Batson, C. D. (2022). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Routledge.
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2022). Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.012
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296–330.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 3–20.
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 610–656). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2021). Prosocial development. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081720-094436
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Harvard University Press.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2021). Intergroup contact theory. In The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 1–25). Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Torres, C., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Butenko, T. (2020). Value tradeoffs and behavior in multicultural contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(6), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120927907
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2020). Intergroup threat theory. Routledge.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845
Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125–141.
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
Verkuyten, M. (2021). Inclusive and exclusive social identities. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1818518
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., Mepham, K., & Sprong, S. (2020). Intergroup contact and prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(3), 1–20.

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>