Validitas Alat Ukur dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan: Kajian Konseptual tentang Jenis, Faktor Penentu, dan Implikasi Pengukuran Validity of Measurement Instruments in Educational Evaluation: A Conceptual Review of Types, Determining Factors, and Measurement Implications

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 60-620
Download PDF
Published: Dec 13, 2025
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8310
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 556 times
Downloaded: 328 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Achmad Rasyid Ridha1, Erna Widyaningsih2
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Achmad Rasyid Ridha
Institut Islam Mamba’ul ‘Ulum Surakarta
Erna Widyaningsih
Institut Islam Mamba’ul ‘Ulum Surakarta

Abstract

Validity is a fundamental aspect of the measurement process because it determines the extent to which an instrument truly measures the construct it is intended to measure. This paper aims to discuss the concept of measurement validity comprehensively, including its definition, the distinction between validity and reliability, and various types of validity, namely content validity, construct validity, criterion-related validity, and face validity. Through a theoretical review and conceptual analysis of various literature sources, the paper also examines factors that affect validity, originating from the characteristics of the instrument, the respondents, the researcher, and environmental conditions. The discussion is further enriched with an explanation of commonly used validity testing methods, including correlation analysis, factor analysis, and expert judgment. This review emphasizes that validity is not only a technical aspect but also an ethical one in research, as it directly influences data quality, the accuracy of decision-making, and the integrity of research. In the digital era, challenges to instrument validity are becoming increasingly complex, thereby requiring continuous strategies for designing, evaluating, and refining the validity of measurement instruments across diverse research and educational evaluation contexts.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
1
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Lukpanov R.E. (2027)
    Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall Block
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
  2. Sarkar R. (2027)
    EVALUATION OF UAV-ADMINISTERED INSECTICIDES AT DIFFERENT DOSES AGAINST BROWN PLANTHOPPER NILAPARVATA LUGENS (STAL)
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(2), 250-254
  3. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Ridha, A. R., & Widyaningsih, E. (2025). Validitas Alat Ukur dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan: Kajian Konseptual tentang Jenis, Faktor Penentu, dan Implikasi Pengukuran. TSAQOFAH, 6(1), 60-620. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8310

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.
Ghozali, I. (2017). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2018). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Parama Publishing.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Prihantoro, E. (2016). Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 45–55.
Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Social Indicators Research, 45, 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006985528729
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Umar, H. (2019). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701375832
Zumbo, B. D., & Chan, E. K. H. (2014). Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>