Sekularisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern dan Tantangannya bagi Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer Secularization of Modern Science and Its Challenges for Contemporary Islamic Education

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The secularization of modern science has shaped a scientific paradigm that separates the empirical dimension from transcendental values, thereby presenting challenges for contemporary Islamic education in maintaining the integration of knowledge, faith, and morality amid developments in science, technology, and globalization. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of the secularization of modern science, identify its impacts on contemporary Islamic education, and formulate strategies for strengthening an Islamic education paradigm oriented towards the integration of knowledge and Islamic values. This study employed a qualitative approach using the library research method. Data were obtained from books, reputable scientific articles, academic documents, and works by scholars of Islamic education and the philosophy of science. The data were analysed using content analysis through the stages of reduction, categorization, interpretation, and conceptual synthesis. The results showed that the secularization of modern science causes epistemological fragmentation, the marginalization of the spiritual dimension in education, the dominance of the positivist paradigm, and the weakening of ethical orientation in the development of science. These conditions affect educational objectives, curriculum structure, learning processes, and students’ character formation in Islamic educational institutions. Contemporary Islamic education has the potential to develop an integrative scientific paradigm through the reconstruction of Islamic epistemology, the strengthening of the Islamic worldview, the integration of revelation and reason, the development of a value-based curriculum, and the revitalization of character education grounded in the Qur’an and Sunnah. This study confirms that strengthening the integrative paradigm is an important foundation for developing Islamic education that is adaptive to advances in modern science without neglecting Islamic identity. These findings provide a conceptual contribution to the development of Islamic education and practical implications for the formulation of educational policies, curriculum design, and learning models that integrate scientific, spiritual, moral, and social dimensions in responding to the dynamics of global civilization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Gangil G. (2027)
    Advanced optimization problems and solution methods for renewable energy integration - A bibliometric review
    Unconventional Resources, 17
  2. Cahalan C. (2027)
    Aemilia Lanyer-s Optics: Luminous Bodies, Replicating Vision, and Women-s Legacy in the Dedications of Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum
    Explorations in Renaissance Culture, 52(1), 102-125
  3. Sokolov D. (2027)
    Sleep and Sleepers in Aemilia Lanyer-s Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum
    Explorations in Renaissance Culture, 52(1), 23-53

Article Details

How to Cite
Maryani, E., & Sumiran. (2026). Sekularisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern dan Tantangannya bagi Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. TSAQOFAH, 6(4), 4401-4415. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.11265

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.

Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and work plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510

Hashim, R., & Rossidy, I. (2000). Islamization of knowledge: A comparative analysis of the conceptions of Al-Attas and Al-Faruqi. Intellectual Discourse, 8(1), 19–44. https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/479

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford University Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Wan Daud, W. M. N. (1998). The educational philosophy and practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.