Kajian Teoretis Perilaku Prososial, Agresi, dan Dinamika Kelompok dalam Perspektif Teori Identitas Sosial Theoretical Study of Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Group Dynamics from the Perspective of Social Identity Theory

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This article presents a theoretical review of prosocial behavior, aggression, and group dynamics within the field of social psychology, based on the Social Identity Theory developed by Tajfel and Turner (1979). The purpose of this review is to understand how helping behavior, aggressive actions, and intergroup interactions can be explained through the processes of categorization, identification, and social comparison. The method employed is a literature review, examining social psychology theories and previous research findings related to social behavior in both academic settings and the broader community. The analysis reveals that prosocial behavior is generally driven by empathy and internalized social values, while aggressive behavior more often arises as a response to frustration or perceived threats to social identity. Group dynamics play a critical role in shaping self-identity, fostering a sense of belonging, and reinforcing social solidarity. The application of Social Identity Theory in this context offers deeper insights into the complex relationship between individuals and groups, highlighting the importance of fostering inclusive, collaborative, and identity-sensitive social environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Bhagyasree M.R. (2027)
    CONSUMER HEALTH ENTOMOLOGY-A FORTIORI INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE OF EMERGING PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE, WITH EMPHASIS ON ITS COMMERCIAL, BEHAVIOURAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 122-127
  2. Artina F. (2027)
    Digital Literacy through a Web-Based Application: Addressing Polarization and Promoting Social Integration among Islamic Senior High School Students
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 51-66
  3. Fazeli F. (2027)
    The representation of the properties of the social actors in the two poetries of“Aghadar”and “Fokhos”written by Sheevan Foumani in accordance with the socio-semantic model and semio-semantic analysis
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 397-431

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, R. M., & S., N. (2025). Kajian Teoretis Perilaku Prososial, Agresi, dan Dinamika Kelompok dalam Perspektif Teori Identitas Sosial. TSAQOFAH, 5(6), 6558-6561. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i6.7774

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Bashori, K. (2017). Menyemai perilaku prososial di sekolah. Sukma: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 57-92.
Berkowitz, L. (1995). Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control. McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2012). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills (11th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Kau, M. A. (2010). Empati dan perilaku Passer, M. W., & Smith, R. E. (2007).
Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior. McGraw-Hill.
Susantyo, D. P. B. (2011). Faktor Penyebab Agresi Remaja. Psikologi Sosial Indonesia, 2(1), 44–53.
Susetyo, D. P. B. (2021). Dinamika Kelompok: Pendekatan Psikologi Sosial. SCU Knowledge Media.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.