Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas IX di SMPN 10 Padang Efforts to Improve Student Learning Outcomes through the Discovery Learning Model in Science Subject for Grade IX at SMPN 10 Padang

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Science learning in class IX.2 at SMPN 10 Padang shows a need to improve student learning outcomes through effective learning methods. This study aims to implement the Discovery Learning model to enhance student learning outcomes in science subjects. The research method used is Classroom Action Research (CAR) involving 32 students during the PPL 2 PPG Teacher Candidate program for the 2024/2025 academic year. The research procedure follows Lewin’s (1992) CAR cycle model consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages across two learning cycles. Data were collected through observation of student learning activities and a 30-item multiple-choice test administered as pretest and posttest, then analyzed using individual mastery percentage formulas. The results showed a significant increase from an average score of 62.81 in cycle I to 75.15 in cycle II, along with an increase in the percentage of students reaching the minimum mastery criteria. Therefore, the Discovery Learning model is effective in improving science learning outcomes for class IX.2 students at SMPN 10 Padang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Kenzhaliyev B.K. (2027)
    Predicting Copper Production Cycles in Hydrometallurgy with Interpretable Machine Learning
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 5-15
  3. Azhand A. (2027)
    Teaching Persian derivational affixes to non-Persian speakers from a Cognitive Morphology Approach: A case study of nominal suffixes (kar, gar, ban, baz, -ande)
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 469-497

Article Details

How to Cite
Hafizah, M. I., Putri, R. E., & Yenira, F. (2025). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas IX di SMPN 10 Padang. TSAQOFAH, 5(3), 2911-2924. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i3.6027

References

Ali, L. U. (2018). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran IPA Ditinjau Dari Hakikat Sains Pada SMP Di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.1020
Darmawan, W. (2013). Penerapan CTL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa SMP.MTs Kelas VII pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan. 154.
Fitri, M., & . D. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Suhu Dan Kalor. INPAFI (Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/inpafi.v3i2.5130
Huda, M. (2014). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., Ramdani, A., & Azizah, A. (2019). Profil Literasi Sains Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pendidik Ipa Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.185
Khasinah, S. (2021). Discovery Learning: Definisi, Sintaksis, Keunggulan dan Kelemahan. Jurnal MUDARRISUNA: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(3), 402. https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v11i3.5821
Lewin, K. (1992). Instructional Design Theory and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nurmisanti. (2017). Identifikasi Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi. 2(1), 17–18.
Pratiwi, D. I. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery pada Mata Pelajaran IPA SDN 66 Kota Bengkulu.
Purnawati, M. (2022). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Ipa Melalui Model Discovery Learning Pada Siswa Kelas Iv Sdn Kalisari 2 Tempuran Kabupaten Magelang. 1–74.
Purwanto, N. (2013). Prinsip - Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.
Taofiq, M., Setiadi, D., & Hadiprayitno, G. (2018). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dan Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains Biologi Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Akademik Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.114
Uno, H., & Nurdin, M. (2011). Belajar dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Zulkarnain, I., & Budiman, H. (2019). Pengaruh Pemahaman Konsep Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika.