Main Article Content


Abstract

Changes in the paradigm and authority of educational supervision are important aspects of improving educational quality because they determine the patterns of guidance, oversight, and professional development for teachers. This study aimed to analyse the paradigm and authority of educational supervision and examine the relationship between the two in improving educational quality. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach using library research through a review of books, scientific journal articles, policy documents, and various sources of literature relevant to educational supervision. The data were analysed through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the development of the supervision paradigm and the application of authority in educational practice. The findings showed that the educational supervision paradigm had shifted from an authoritarian inspection approach to collaborative, humanistic, and transformational approaches oriented towards the continuous professional development of teachers. This shift also transformed supervisory authority from a hierarchical, control-based pattern into participatory professional leadership grounded in competence, integrity, and the ability to empower teachers. In the context of modern education, supervision functions not only as an oversight mechanism but also as a strategic instrument for enhancing teacher professionalism, strengthening instructional leadership, building professional learning communities, and supporting educational transformation in the digital era. This study confirms that the effectiveness of supervision is determined by the alignment between a collaborative paradigm and the professional, ethical, and participatory exercise of authority. These findings provide a conceptual contribution to the development of educational supervision and practical implications for supervisors and leaders of educational institutions in integrating professional leadership, collaboration, ethics, and the use of technology into efforts to sustainably improve educational quality.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 11307.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Angraini L.M. (2027)
    Integrating Computational Thinking and Islamic Values in Geometry Learning: Effects on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 67-78
  2. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252
  3. Hetmanenko L. (2027)
    Research Competence of a Modern Teacher as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Education and Supporting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 107-126

Article Details

How to Cite
Sani, M., & Fatimah, M. (2026). Supervisi dan Pengembangan Profesional Guru. TSAQOFAH, 6(4), 4375-4400. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.11307

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Supervisi Pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Houghton Mifflin.

Daryanto. (2015). Supervisi Pembelajaran. Gava Media.

DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. National Educational Service.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson.

Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. H., & Krajewski, R. J. (1993). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers (3rd ed.). Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005

Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional learning communities: Educators work together toward a shared purpose—improved student learning. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40–43. https://learningforward.org/journal/what-works/professional-learning-communities/

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2023). Moderasi Beragama dalam Pendidikan Islam. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhaimin. (2012). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam: Upaya Mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nata, A. (2018). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Prenadamedia Group.

OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

Pidarta, M. (2009). Supervisi Pendidikan Kontekstual. Rineka Cipta.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). Doubleday.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2005). Strengthening the heartbeat: Leading and learning together in schools. Jossey-Bass.

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques (4th ed.). Corwin Press. https://www.corwin.com/books/supervision-that-improves-teachi-239339

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Oxford University Press.

Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625874

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>