Deskripsi Model Mental Peserta Didik pada Materi Termokimia Kelas XI SMAN 2 Padang Description of Students’ Mental Models on Thermochemistry Material in Grade XI at SMAN 2 Padang

Main Article Content

Farah Nalsha Laila Putri
Dwi Finna Syolendra

Abstract

The low achievement in the 2025 Senior High School Chemistry Academic Competency Test (TKA) indicates that students’ understanding of chemistry concepts remains suboptimal, particularly in abstract topics such as thermochemistry, which may lead to the formation of mental models that are inconsistent with scientific concepts. This study aimed to describe students’ mental models in thermochemistry as a basis for evaluation in improving the quality of Grade XI chemistry learning at SMAN 2 Padang. This study used a qualitative approach with a descriptive design, involving 30 students selected through random sampling. Data were collected using an essay test instrument that had been validated by experts with an Aiken’s V coefficient of 0.903, and were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively based on the alignment of students’ answers with scientific concepts. The results showed that students’ mental models were still dominated by the Initial Model and Synthesis Model categories, while the Scientific Model category remained relatively low. Students still experienced misconceptions, particularly in distinguishing between system and surroundings, understanding the direction of heat transfer, and connecting macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations. These findings indicate that students’ understanding remains at an initial stage to a transitional stage toward scientific understanding. Thus, this study contributes to mapping the profile of students’ mental models in thermochemistry and serves as a basis for developing more effective chemistry learning strategies through a multiple-representation approach and the use of visual media to help students develop mental models toward the Scientific Model category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Prahani R.S.B.K. (2027)
    Problem-Based Learning Assisted by Physics Digital Pocket Book: Experimental Study to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Completed with Bibliometric Analysis toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 15-34
  2. Bursan I.Z. (2027)
    The Integration of Islamic Religious Values in the Ritual Mantras of Pinisi Boat-Making as Instructional Material for Literature Learning in Islamic Schools
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 1-14
  3. Artina F. (2027)
    Digital Literacy through a Web-Based Application: Addressing Polarization and Promoting Social Integration among Islamic Senior High School Students
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 51-66

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, F. N. L., & Syolendra, D. F. (2026). Deskripsi Model Mental Peserta Didik pada Materi Termokimia Kelas XI SMAN 2 Padang. MASALIQ, 6(3), 1204-1216. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v6i3.9964

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Assma, S., Fadhilah, R., & Hadiarti, D. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Multipel Representasi pada Materi Stoikiometri Kelas X SMAN 01 Rasau Jaya. Ar-Razi Jurnal Ilmiah, 6(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.29406/arz.v6i1.940

Dewi, K. M., Suja, I. W., & Sastrawidana, I. D. K. (2018). Model Mental Siswa tentang Termokimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 2(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v2i2.21165

Hakim, E., Astafani, A., & Resmawati, R. F. (2024). Systematic Review Faktor-Faktor Kesulitan Belajar Materi Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 18(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/qm1ym619

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge University Press.

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

Kania, V. I., Samsudin, A., Purwanto, Aminudin, A. H., Rasmitadila, Rachmadtullah, R., Jermsittiparsert, K., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). Multitier of greenhouse effect (MoGE) instrument development to identify middle school students’ mental model in Thailand with Rasch analysis. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 3223–3237. https://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/issue/view/283

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Hasil Tes Kemampuan Akademik 2025. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. https://tka.kemendikdasmen.go.id/hasiltka/

Khasanah, N., Wartono, W., & Yuliati, L. (2016). Analysis of mental model of students using isomorphic problems in dynamics of rotational motion topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5921

Kurnaz, M. A., & Emen, A. Y. (2014). Student mental models related to expansion and contraction. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 7(1), 59–67. https://padi.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro/adn/article_7_1_6.pdf

Pidiana, D., & Azra, F. (2024). Penggunaan Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier untuk Diagnosa Model Mental Siswa pada Konsep Kesetimbangan Heterogen di SMAN 3 Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 28277–28286. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/18277

Pikoli, M., Sukertini, K., & Isa, I. (2022). Analisis Model Mental Siswa dalam Mentransformasikan Konsep Laju Reaksi melalui Multipel Representasi. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i1.13515

Roghdah, S. J., Zammi, M., & Mardhiya, J. (2021). Pengembangan Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik pada Materi Termokimia. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2021.11.1.8573

Sabekti, A. W., & Khoirunnisa, F. (2018). Penggunaan Rasch Model untuk Mengembangkan Instrumen Pengukuran Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Topik Ikatan Kimia. Jurnal Zarah, 6(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.31629/zarah.v6i2.724

Sadia, I. W. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran sains konstruktivistik. Graha Ilmu.

Serhan, M., Sprowls, M., Jackemeyer, D., Long, M., Perez, I. D., Maret, W., Tao, N., & Forzani, E. (2019). Total iron measurement in human serum with a smartphone. In 2019 AIChE Annual Meeting (AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings; Vol. 2019-November). American Institute of Chemical Engineers. https://asu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/total-iron-measurement-in-human-serum-with-a-smartphone/

Setiawan, N. C. E., Sulistina, O., Habiddin, H., & Pavita, R. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android untuk Memfasilitasi Kebutuhan Pembelajaran Multiple Representation. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 9(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v9i1.3801

Sudarmin, S., Pujiastuti, R. S. E., Asyhar, R., Prasetya, A. T., Diliarosta, S., & Ariyatun, A. (2023). Chemistry project-based learning for secondary metabolite course with ethno-STEM approach to improve students’ conservation and entrepreneurial character in the 21st century. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1792

Supriadi, S., Ibnu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2018). Analisis Model Mental Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia dalam Memahami Berbagai Jenis Reaksi Kimia. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 13(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v13i1.433

Yoni, A. A. S., Suja, I. W., & Karyasa, I. W. (2018). Profil Model Mental Siswa SMA Kelas X tentang Konsep-Konsep Dasar Kimia pada Kurikulum Sains SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(2), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v2i2.16616


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)