Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The ability to use chemical representation levels is important in helping students understand chemistry concepts comprehensively through the interconnection of macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations. The Basic Laws of Chemistry is a fundamental topic that requires students to be able to connect these three levels of representation; however, students still experience difficulties, especially in understanding concepts at the particle or microscopic level. This study aims to describe the chemical representation level ability of Grade X students on the topic of the Basic Laws of Chemistry at SMA Negeri 9 Pekanbaru. This study used a quantitative descriptive approach with a survey design. The research sample consisted of 102 students from classes X-5, X-6, and X-7, selected using cluster sampling. Data were collected using a written essay test consisting of 15 items and covering three levels of chemical representation, namely macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic. The data were analyzed descriptively and quantitatively by calculating the percentage of students’ ability at each level of representation. The results showed that students’ overall chemical representation level ability was in the good category, with an average percentage of 75%. Symbolic representation ability obtained the highest percentage, at 78%, in the good category, followed by macroscopic representation at 76% in the good category and microscopic representation at 70% in the good category. These findings indicate that students more easily understand chemistry concepts in the form of symbols and calculations than abstract concepts at the particle level. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that students’ microscopic representation ability still needs to be improved so that the interconnection among macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations can be formed more optimally in chemistry learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Jiang Y. (2027)
    Rheologically Engineered 3D-Printed Highly Loaded Magneto-Dielectric Absorbers for Device-Level Electromagnetic Compatibility
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  2. Feng X. (2027)
    Designing Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with Self-Assembled Monolayer Hole Transport Layers
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  3. Arianpour M. (2027)
    Assessment of Pragmatic Disorders in Persian­Speaking Adults with Acquired Brain Injury
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 35-70

Article Details

How to Cite
Azani, G. F., Abdullah, A., & Erviyenni, E. (2026). Kemampuan Level Representasi Kimia Murid Kelas X pada Materi Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia. MASALIQ, 6(4), 1501-1513. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v6i4.10448

References

Akbar, J. S., & Djakariah. (2025). Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Representasi Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia: Tinjauan Literatur. Journal of Chemistry Sciences and Education, 2(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.69606/jcse.v2i02.358

Astuti, E. A., Haryani, S., & Pujiastuti, S. L. (2023). Peningkatan Keterampilan Laboratorium Murid Melalui Pembelajaran Penemuan (Discovery) pada Materi Penyetaraan Reaksi Kimia Kelas X. Journal for Energetic Youngsters, 1(2), 66–78.

Fahyuddin, Liliasari, Sabandar, J., & Martoprawiro, M. A. (2015). Perbandingan Metode Kolaborasi Dengan Contoh Tugas dan Belajar Individual Dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Kimia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.4174

Farida, I., & Sopandi, W. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Web, Interkoneksi Multiple Level Representasi, Kesetimbangan Larutan Asam-Basa. Jurnal Chemica, 12(1), 14–24. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/chemica/article/view/131

Hasfiana, Ondeng, S., & Rahman, U. (2026). Populasi dan Sampel Sebagai Dasar Metodologis Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan. Interdisiplin: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 3(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.61166/interdisiplin.v3i1.145

Ihsan, M. S., & Jannah, S. W. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Blended Learning. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 6(1), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v6i1.2934

Isnaini, M., & Ningrum, W. P. (2018). Hubungan Keterampilan Representasi Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Kimia Organik. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v2i2.2637

Kholiqowati, H., Sugiarto, & Hidayah, I. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v5i3.12493

Langitasari, I., Rogayah, T., & Solfarina. (2021). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) pada Topik Struktur Atom: Keaktifan, Kreativitas, dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(2), 2813–2823. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i2.24866

Lase, A. S., & Zalukhu, T. S. (2026). Analisis Profil Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Representasi Kimia pada Materi Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Laju Reaksi. Katalis: Jurnal Penelitian Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 9(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.33059/katalis.v9i1.13466

Mujakir. (2018). Pemanfaatan Bahan Ajar Berdasarkan Multi Level Representasi untuk Melatih Kemampuan Siswa Menyelesaikan Masalah Kimia Larutan. Lantanida Journal, 5(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v5i2.2839

Muliani, Marhami, & Lukman, I. R. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Tentang Literasi Sains. JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i1.1575

Musa, W. J. A., Mantuli, M. A., Tangio, J. S., Iyabu, H., Kilo, J. L., & Kilo, A. K. (2023). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Tingkat Representasi Makroskopik, Mikroskopik, dan Simbolik pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 5(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v5i1.15201

Nadia, Nuraini, I., Rabiah, N. H., Saputri, R. D., Khoirunnisa, F., & Sukemi. (2025). Video Pembelajaran Kimia: Media untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Bivalen: Chemical Studies Journal, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30872/bcsj.v8i1.4909

Putra, R. D., Murtadho, M. A., Isnaini, M., & Afgani, M. W. (2025). Design Penelitian Kuantitatif: Pengertian dan Macam-Macam Jenisnya. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i3.1805

Rodiatul, S., & Alizar. (2024). Deskripsi Pemahaman Multirepresentasi Kimia Peserta Didik pada Materi Reaksi Kimia Fase E SMAN 1 2 X 11 Kayutanam. Journal of Global Research Education, 2(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.62194/at5qa221

Rosyidiana, H., Nurlaily, V. A., Rezania, V., Fashiha, H. M., Aini, N., Larasati, D. A., Qurbani, G., Putri, R., Faradita, M. N., Suttrisno, Nursalim, M., & Rahmasari, D. (2025). Neuropsikologi Pendidikan Dasar: Kognisi, Emosi, dan Strategi Belajar. Umsida Press. https://press.umsida.ac.id/index.php/umsidapress/article/view/1537

Safitri, N. C., Nursa’adah, E., & Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis Multipel Representasi Kimia Siswa pada Konsep Laju Reaksi. EduChemia: Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023

Sandrika, T., Kartika, T. A., Hasibuan, T. K., Akil, & Azis, A. (2025). Transformasi Penilaian Pembelajaran di Kelas Dalam Pembelajaran Holistik di Era Kurikulum Merdeka. Hayati: Journal of Education, Natural Sciences and Biology, 1(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.69836/hayati.v1i1.344

Sihaloho, T., Sidauruk, S., & Anggraeni, M. E. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Memahami Konsep Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia: Systematic Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 15(2), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v15i2.230

Suarsani, G. A. (2019). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia Dengan Materi Pokok Kimia Unsur Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v2i1.17607

Sukmawati, W. (2019). Analisis Level Makroskopis, Mikroskopis, dan Simbolik Mahasiswa Dalam Memahami Elektrokimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.27517

Suparwati, N. M. A. (2022). Analisis Reduksi Miskonsepsi Kimia Dengan Pendekatan Multi Level Representasi: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.591

Taber, K. S. (2009). Learning at the symbolic level. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Chemical Education (pp. 75–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_5

Whindayati, A. (2025). Hambatan Konseptual dan Miskonsepsi Siswa Dalam Materi Bangun Ruang di SDN Duren Sawit 06: Tinjauan Literatur. AT-TAKLIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin, 2(5), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.71282/at-taklim.v2i5.322