Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Kancing Gemerincing terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SD N 03 Pakan Labuah The Effect of the Talking Chips Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Learning Motivation in the Islamic Religious Education Subject at SD N 03 Pakan Labuah
Main Article Content
Abstract
Student learning motivation has been a concern in various previous studies; however, studies that specifically examine the effect of the talking chips cooperative learning model on students’ learning motivation in Islamic Religious Education subjects at the elementary school level remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the talking chips cooperative learning model on the learning motivation of fifth-grade students at SD N 03 Pakan Labuah. This study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design through a nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design, involving 45 students selected using total sampling. Data were collected through a learning motivation questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability, and were then analyzed using the N-Gain test and hypothesis testing with the assistance of SPSS 27. The results showed that the implementation of the talking chips cooperative learning model had a significant effect on students’ learning motivation, with a significance value (Sig. 2-tailed) of 0.001 < 0.05 and an N-Gain score of 0.95 in the high category. These findings contribute to the development of studies on cooperative learning and learning motivation, while also expanding understanding of the importance of active participation-based learning in increasing students’ motivation. The conclusion of this study confirms that the talking chips cooperative learning model can serve as an effective interactive learning strategy in the context of Islamic Religious Education, with practical implications for teachers and schools in improving the quality of the learning process and opening opportunities for further research on other variables that influence students’ learning motivation.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio Books.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hamalik, O. (2019). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In S. M. Brito (Ed.), Active learning—Beyond the future. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Pearson.
Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. Kagan Publishing.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Puspita, R. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(2), 100–110.
Salsabila, U. H., & Firman. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 150–160.
Sanjaya, W. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Kencana.
Santrock, J. W. (2017). Educational psychology (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Sari, M. (2020). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 45–55.
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sujaunah. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kancing Gemerincing terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 14(1), 75–85.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035














