Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although literacy and numeracy are increasingly emphasized in the development of learning assessment, studies that specifically integrate both into the assessment of Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti (PAI-BP) from the perspective of Islamic Education Management remain limited. This study aims to analyze the principles of literacy and numeracy integration in PAI-BP assessment, synthesize relevant management functions, examine the role of the Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) as a mechanism for professional collaboration, and formulate a conceptual model for its management. The study employed an integrative literature review approach involving national and international journal articles, academic books, and relevant assessment framework documents. The literature was selected based on relevance, credibility, traceability, and conceptual contribution, with priority given to recent sources. The synthesis results revealed four main findings. First, literacy and numeracy need to be integrated as ways of applying PAI-BP knowledge in learning and assessment contexts. Second, assessment quality requires alignment, validity, appropriate stimuli and cognitive demands, fairness, scoring consistency, and quality review. Third, assessment development requires a systematic management cycle to ensure that planning, implementation, evaluation, and follow-up processes are conducted in a directed manner. Fourth, MGMP has the potential to strengthen professional collaboration in assessment development and quality assurance. The review also identified several challenges, including disparities in assessment literacy, limited time, a tendency for collaboration to be administrative in nature, and suboptimal follow-up on assessment results. Based on these findings, the study formulates a conceptual model that links PAI-BP competencies, literacy-numeracy integration, assessment quality standards, management processes, MGMP collaboration, and continuous evaluation. This model provides a conceptual contribution to strengthening PAI-BP assessment management and developing teachers’ professional collaboration, while also serving as a framework that requires further testing through empirical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Sheng T. (2027)
    Photothermal Superhydrophobic Textiles: An Emerging Paradigm from Passive Water Repellency to Active Thermal Management
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  2. Thu T.T.T. (2027)
    Management accounting effectiveness in tourism enterprises: The roles of technology readiness, information technology infrastructure, and data quality in an ai-driven business environment
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  3. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252

Article Details

How to Cite
Adi, F. P., & Yusuf, E. B. (2026). Manajemen Pengembangan Asesmen Literasi dan Numerasi PAI-BP dalam Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. ARZUSIN, 6(6), 6128-6141. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i6.12148

References

Aisyah, A., Saona, S., & Sadaat, S. H. (2024). Implementation of authentic assessment of Islamic Religious Education in the Merdeka Curriculum: Qualitative studies in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains in vocational high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(4), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v5i4.9663

Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/theories-of-educational-leadership-and-management-5-258644

Coombe, C., Vafadar, H., & Mohebbi, H. (2020). Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Language Testing in Asia, 10, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00101-6

Forisma, A., Ni’mah, Z., & Sukiman. (2023). Teknik dan Instrumen Asesmen Keterampilan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Dikdasmen dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v14i1.36741

Geng, J., & Yusoff, N. M. (2023). The shared features of effective improvement programmes for teachers’ assessment literacy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(4), 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2084398

Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2021). Using full-information item analysis to improve item quality. Educational Assessment, 26(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1946390

Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510

Hamdi, S., Purnomo, Y. W., Hidayati, K., & Mu’minin, N. (2023). Development of CBT testlet model for minimum competency assessment of numeracy literacy at elementary school level. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.67473

Hidayati, Z., Nurdi, N., Kusaeri, K., Suparto, S., & Malyuna, S. I. (2025). Assessing the assessor: Investigating formative assessment literacy among Islamic Education teachers in Lamongan, Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(4), 6074–6086. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.7933

Huijboom, F., Van Meeuwen, P., Rusman, E., & Vermeulen, M. (2021). Professional learning communities (PLCs) as learning environments for teachers: An in-depth examination of the development of seven PLCs and influencing factors. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100566

Hull, P., & Vígh, T. (2025). Teachers’ assessment literacy: A descriptive literature review. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2024.00317

Juwita, S., Safwannur, Nasir, T. M., Hajrah, & Sidik, M. (2023). Analisis Soal dan Kemampuan Peserta Didik Berbasis Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SD Ashfiya Kota Bandung. ATTA’DIB, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.32832/at-tadib.v7i3.19498

Kasmayadi, W., Kumaidi, & Sumarno. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Diri Guru terhadap Aktivitas Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.8290

Liu, J., Aziku, M., Qiang, F., & Zhang, B. (2024). Leveraging professional learning communities in linking digital professional development and instructional integration: Evidence from 16,072 STEM teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00513-3

Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1), 3–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15366359MEA0101_02

Muharrozi, M., Anwar, S., & Romli, U. (2025). Strengthening holistic assessment in Islamic religious education: Cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 10(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v10i2.13364

Nazwa, S., Latieva, A., Sabila, H., Fithratunnisa, F., & Zulkarnain, A. I. (2026). Challenges of implementing assessment in Islamic Education (PAI) learning in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah: Policy and practice analysis. ARZUSIN: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Dasar, 6(4), 3834–3845. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i4.10390

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

Pastore, S. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1217167. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167

Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10019

Puspawati, I. (2022). Teachers language assessment literacy: A systematic review. Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i1.5613

Rahayu, F., & Istikomah. (2024). Implementation of Merdeka Curriculum in Islamic Religious Education learning: Analysis of principles and assessment models. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 29(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v29i1.23688

Rosyidah, S., Syah, M., & Arifin, B. S. (2024). Standardized assessment and examination in Islamic Religious Education. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 7(3), 1653–1660. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i3.1087

Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Van der Schaaf, M. F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Bok, H. G. J. (2023). Between theory and practice: Educators’ perceptions on assessment quality criteria and its impact on student learning. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1147213. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1147213

Sudianto, & Kisno. (2021). Potret Kesiapan Guru Sekolah Dasar dan Manajemen Sekolah dalam Menghadapi Asesmen Nasional. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v9i1.39260

Sun’iyah, S. L. (2022). Penilaian PAI Berbasis Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum dan Survei Karakter pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar. Dar el-Ilmi: Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 9(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.52166/darelilmi.v9i1.3086

Tout, D. (2020). Evolution of adult numeracy from quantitative literacy to numeracy: Lessons learned from international assessments. International Review of Education, 66(2–3), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09831-4

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004

Weng, F., & Shen, B. (2022). Language assessment literacy of teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 864582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864582

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x