Organisasi sebagai Struktur Sosial dalam Perspektif Islam: Integrasi Nilai Amanah, Keadilan, dan Efisiensi di Era Digital Organizations as Social Structures in an Islamic Perspective: Integration of amanah, Justice, and Efficiency in the Digital Era
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although studies on organizations and social structures have been widely discussed in management and organizational sociology literature, research that specifically integrates an Islamic perspective, particularly the values of amanah, justice, and efficiency, within organizational contexts in the digital era remains relatively limited. This study aims to analyze organizations as social structures from an Islamic perspective and to explore the integration of the values of amanah, justice, and efficiency in organizational management amid digital transformation. The study adopts a qualitative approach with a library research design, involving analysis of primary sources comprising the Qur'an, the Sunnah, as well as classical and contemporary works in Islamic thought, management, and organizational sociology. Data were collected through documentation techniques and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify concepts, values, and patterns of integration between Islamic teachings and modern organizational practices. The findings show that amanah functions as the ethical foundation of leadership and organizational governance, justice becomes the main principle in role distribution and decision-making, and efficiency is understood as a form of professionalism and resource optimization aligned with the principle of ihsan. These findings contribute to the development of a conceptual framework for organizations grounded in Islamic values and broaden the understanding of the relevance of Islamic teachings for organizational management in the digital era. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of integrating the values of amanah, justice, and efficiency in building sustainable, welfare-oriented organizations, and recommends that organizational leaders, educational institutions, and policymakers adopt these values as ethical and strategic foundations in modern organizational governance. The implications of this research include theoretical contributions to enriching the Islamic management literature and practical implications for developing organizations that are adaptive, ethical, and competitive in the digital era, while also opening avenues for further research on the empirical implementation of Islamic values in contemporary organizations.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ali, A. J., & Al-Owaihan, A. (2008). Islamic work ethic: A critical review. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810848791
Ali, A. J., & Elgar, E. (n.d.). Islamic perspectives on management and organization
Beekun, R. I. (2012). Character centered leadership: Muhammad (p) as an ethical role model for CEOs. Journal of Management Development, 31(10), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211281799
Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8204-5
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2021). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennen, J. S., & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. In K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley, & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (pp. 1–11). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Furqani, H., & Haneef, M. A. (n.d.). Methodology of Islamic economics: Typology of current practices, evaluation and way forward. https://www.iefpedia.com/english/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Mohamed.Aslam_.Haneef.pdf
Kamla, R., Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. (2006). Islam, nature and accounting: Islamic principles and the notion of accounting for the environment. Accounting Forum, 30(3), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.05.003
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Possumah, B. T., Ismail, A. G., & Shahimi, S. (2013). Bringing work back in Islamic ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1246-1
Rizk, R. R. (2008). Back to basics: An Islamic perspective on business and work ethics. Social Responsibility Journal, 4, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856992
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:
| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |














