Selektivitas Penuntutan Kejahatan Internasional dalam Praktik Peradilan Global: Studi Kasus Penanganan Kejahatan Perang oleh International Criminal Court Selectivity in the Prosecution of International Crimes in Global Judicial Practice: A Case Study of the Handling of War Crimes by the International Criminal Court
Main Article Content
Abstract
The issue of selectivity in the prosecution of international crimes remains a crucial problem in the global criminal justice system. The establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) through the Rome Statute aims to enforce accountability and eliminate impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes, particularly war crimes, but in its implementation the ICC is often considered not to have applied law enforcement evenly. This study aims to examine the characteristics of selectivity in the prosecution of war crimes by the ICC, the factors that influence it, and its impact on the legitimacy of global justice. This study employed a normative legal method with statutory and case analysis approaches. The results of the study show that selectivity in prosecution is influenced by limitations in jurisdictional authority, the application of the principle of complementarity, the ICC’s dependence on state cooperation, and international political dynamics, especially those related to the role of the United Nations Security Council. These conditions are reflected in the tendency for case handling to focus on certain regions and countries, while similar alleged violations involving countries with major political influence are rarely processed to the prosecution stage. These findings indicate that selectivity in prosecution has implications for declining trust in the ICC and has the potential to weaken the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Thus, this study affirms that the legitimacy of global criminal justice depends greatly on consistency, independence, and equality in the enforcement of international law.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Akande, D. (2012). The effect of Security Council resolutions and domestic proceedings on state obligations to cooperate with the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(2), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs019
Andersen, R., & Wongkar, A. R. (2019). Selektivitas Penuntutan dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional. Lex Privatum, 7(2), 45.
Bosco, D. (2017). Discretion and state influence at the International Criminal Court: The prosecutor’s preliminary examinations. American Journal of International Law, 111(2), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.28
Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x
Cassese, A., & Gaeta, P. (2013). Cassese’s international criminal law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chlevickaitė, G., Holá, B., & Bijleveld, C. C. J. H. (2020). Judicial witness assessments at the ICTY, ICTR and ICC: Is there ‘standard practice’ in international criminal justice? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 18(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaa002
Cryer, R., Robinson, D., & Vasiliev, S. (2019). An introduction to international criminal law and procedure (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hanifah, S. B., Lestarika, D. P., & Sary, W. E. (2025). Analisis Efektivitas Mekanisme Yurisdiksi Internasional dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Genosida. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 12(5), 21–30. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/16
Hrynevych, O., Blanco Canto, M., & Jiménez García, M. (2024). The war effect: A macro view of the economic and environmental situation of Ukraine. Applied Economics, 56(39), 4685–4701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2212975
Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
International Criminal Court. (2026). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/publications/core-legal-texts/rome-statute-international-criminal-court
Irni, S. M., & Prasetiya Arrafi, D. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum International Criminal Court atas Perintah Penangkapan Presiden Vladimir Putin. UNES Law Review, 5(4), 2741–2752. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.494
Jo, H., & Simmons, B. A. (2016). Can the International Criminal Court deter atrocity? International Organization, 70(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000114
Mahadewa, D. G. R., & Dewi, P. E. T. (2025). Tinjauan Yurisdiksi Hukum Internasional terhadap Kejahatan Perang dalam Konflik Rusia-Ukraina: Analisis Peran Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC). Rio Law Jurnal, 6(2), 865–874. https://ojs.umb-bungo.ac.id/index.php/RIO/article/view/1794
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Rev. ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muhtadi, A., Equity, B., & Zaenuddin. (2026). Perkembangan dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional dalam Menangani Kejahatan Lintas Negara. Sinergi: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(1), 1264–1280. https://publikasi.ahlalkamal.com/index.php/sinergi/article/view/362
Ryngaert, C. (2015). Jurisdiction in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Schabas, W. A. (2016). The International Criminal Court: A commentary on the Rome Statute (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Schabas, W. A. (2017). An introduction to the International Criminal Court (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, M. N. (2021). International law (9th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Widyawati, A. (2014). Selektivitas Penegakan Hukum dalam Peradilan Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 44(2), 213.




















