Efektivitas Sistem Checks and Balances dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Effectiveness of the Checks and Balances System in the Indonesian Constitutional System

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although the principle of separation of powers has received considerable attention in various constitutional studies, research specifically examining the practical effectiveness of checks and balances mechanisms following the amendments to the UUD NRI Tahun 1945 remains limited. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of implementing the checks and balances system in Indonesia’s constitutional system and identify the factors influencing its implementation. The study employed a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials analyzed included the UUD NRI Tahun 1945, laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, books, and scholarly journal articles. The results indicate that, normatively, the checks and balances system has been designed through a relatively balanced distribution of authority among state institutions in accordance with the principle of separation of powers. However, its implementation continues to face various obstacles, including the dominance of political coalitions, the weak oversight function of the DPR, political interference in independent institutions, and a weak constitutional culture. These findings strengthen constitutional law scholarship on institutional accountability while broadening the understanding of the gap between normative design and the practice of power distribution within Indonesia’s presidential system. This study concludes that institutional independence and strengthened constitutional literacy are important factors in establishing an effective checks and balances mechanism. The implications of this study include a theoretical contribution to the development of constitutional law literature and practical implications for legislative reform and the strengthening of public constitutional education. This study also opens opportunities for further research on the empirical performance of state institutions in carrying out their functions of oversight and balancing power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Angraini L.M. (2027)
    Integrating Computational Thinking and Islamic Values in Geometry Learning: Effects on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 67-78
  2. Fu C. (2027)
    Polar graph mixture density network for probabilistic power system state estimation
    Electric Power Systems Research, 264
  3. Nassabeh M. (2027)
    Application of petrophysics-based machine learning for caprock resilience in CO2 and H2 storage
    Unconventional Resources, 16

Article Details

How to Cite
Dawolo, O., Al Farisi, R., Eksantoso, S., & Jatmiko, K. (2026). Efektivitas Sistem Checks and Balances dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. AHKAM, 5(4), 3731-3741. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11456

References

Abqa, M. A. R., Junaidi, Hutabarat, S. A., Suhariyanto, D., Fauziah, N. M., Khilmi, E. F., Meliana, Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Hukum Tata Negara. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Cikdin, Y. K. A. (2022). Peran Generasi Muda dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum di Masyarakat. De Cive: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(5), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v2i5.1590

Fadhli, T., Siregar, S. S., Al Fatha, K., Rahimah, F. N., Siregar, A., Anggraini, L., Pertiwi, K. N., Pasaribu, I. P. S., Fitri, A. A., & Purba, N. H. (2023). Konstitusi Indonesia dalam Menjamin Hak Warga Negara. Educandumedia: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kependidikan, 2(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.61721/educandumedia.v3i1.207

Fahri, A. F. (2026). Hubungan Lembaga Eksekutif dan Legislatif dalam Penyusunan Rancangan APBD di Kabupaten Bulukumba. GOVERNMENT: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 19(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.31947/jgov.v19i1.52190

Flora, H. S., & Ismaya, B. (2026). Peningkatan Kesadaran Masyarakat terhadap Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. SABAJAYA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 117–128. https://journal.sabajayapublisher.com/index.php/jpkm/article/view/790

Mashudi, Effendi, P., Basid, A., & Fadli, A. R. (2023). Pemaksaan Konsep Trias Politica pada Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 5(4), 4527–4542. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.761

Sinaga, N. A. (2020). Kode Etik sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum yang Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460

Pulungan, R. A. R., & Tyesta, L. A. L. W. (2022). Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Prinsip Checks and Balances antara Lembaga Legislatif dan Eksekutif dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.280-293

Purwoyuwono, E. (2010). Penguatan Fungsi Legislasi DPRD dalam Pembuatan Raperda Inisiatif. Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(1), 72–81. https://journal.uwgm.ac.id/yuriska/article/view/195

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Rohmah, E. I. (2023). Dinamika Overlapping Kewenangan DPR dan Presiden dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Negara. DEKRIT: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.56943/dekrit.v13n1.137

Rusdiana, S. (2022). Improving legislative performance by strengthening authority and increasing obligations. YURISDIKSI: Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains, 18(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v18i3.155

Sanusi, U., & Hadinatha, M. F. (2023). Menghidupkan Norma Inkonstitusional dalam Undang-Undang: Suatu Analisis Prinsip Checks and Balances. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2027

Simorangkir, H. (2022). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia: Teori dan Penerapan. Penerbit Amerta Media.

Siregar, M. A., Lubis, J. N., Siregar, P. G., & Sitompul, N. S. (2025). Dinamika Check & Balance Antar Lembaga Negara di Indonesia pada Masa Periode Kedua Presiden Jokowi. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(4), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.4765

Umam, K., Ashari, & Amalia, R. A. (2023). Rekonstruksi Prinsip Checks and Balances Antar Lembaga Negara Berdasarkan Pancasila. Jatiswara, 38(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v38i2.514

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagaimana Telah Diubah Terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Waruwu, P. R., Rahmayanti, Suryana, R. S., & Nurdana, S. A. (2026). Analisis Hukum Pidana terhadap Kebocoran Data Pribadi dalam Sistem Elektronik di Indonesia. Yustisi, 13(2), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v13i2.23893

Werdiningsih, M. A. (2021). Check and Balances dalam Sistem Peradilan Etik. Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi, 1(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7454/JKD.v1i1.1104

Wibowo, M. B., Rozzaqqi, M. N., & Finardi, S. A. (2023). Kesadaran Mahasiswa terhadap Hukum dan Norma di Program Studi Teknik Lingkungan UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.46930/ppkn.v5i1.3384

Most read articles by the same author(s)