Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Komando dalam Konflik Bosnia Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Internasional: Studi Yurisprudensi ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia) Juridical Analysis of the Principle of Command Responsibility in the Bosnia Conflict Based on International Criminal Law: A Jurisprudential Study of ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia)

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The principle of command responsibility is an important doctrine in international criminal law that allows military commanders to be held accountable for crimes committed by subordinates under their control. This doctrine is grounded in the concept of hierarchical accountability, namely the obligation of superiors to prevent, supervise, and take action against violations of international humanitarian law. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and application of the principle of command responsibility in the Bosnia conflict of 1992–1995 based on the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), as well as to assess its conformity with the principle of legality and the principle of culpability in international criminal law. This study employed a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results show that the main elements of command responsibility include the superior-subordinate relationship, effective control, and the knowledge element (knew or should have known), all of which must be proven factually. The ICTY affirmed that responsibility does not arise automatically from formal position, but rather from the actual ability to control and prevent crimes. Although there is debate regarding the limits of the interpretation of effective control and the should have known standard, the application of this doctrine in the Bosnia cases generally remained within the framework of the principles of nullum crimen sine lege and nulla poena sine culpa. These findings indicate that the principle of command responsibility in ICTY jurisprudence is consistent with the fundamental principles of international criminal law and strengthens the legitimacy of this doctrine in enforcing command criminal accountability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  2. Couto M. (2026)
    Exploiting topic analysis models to explore psychological dimensions in social media data
    Scientific Reports, 16(1)
  3. Galofré J.C. (2026)
    Limitations in the interpretation of thyroid function tests
    Medicina Clinica, 166(10)

Article Details

How to Cite
Ayu, T., & Lestarika, D. P. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Komando dalam Konflik Bosnia Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Internasional: Studi Yurisprudensi ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia). AHKAM, 5(2), 1216-1235. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9672

References

Ahdillah, Z. A., & Sudana, D. S. (2025). Intervensi Organisasi Kerja Sama Islam (OKI) dalam Merespons Konflik dan Pembantaian Muslim di Bosnia (1992–1995). Historia Islamica: Journal of Islamic History and Civilization, 4(1), 92–104. https://ejournal.iain-manado.ac.id/historia/article/view/1529

Airel, A., & Makarim, H. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Komando di Indonesia sebagai Perwujudan Keadilan Transisi. Jurist-Diction, 4(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i2.25746

Banjarani, D. R., Tahar, A. M., & Aini, D. C. (2017). Studi Perbandingan Kelembagaan dan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) dan the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) dengan International Criminal Court (ICC). Cepalo, 1(1), 41–56.

Fitri, F. A., Muftia, N., Trilia, I., Munthe, A. H., & Ramlan, R. (2024). Tinjauan Teoritis tentang Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(2), 202–209. https://jurnal.fanshurinstitute.org/index.php/jimmi/article/view/134

Gunawan, Y., Aulawi, M. H., & Ramadhan, A. R. (2019). Command responsibility of autonomous weapons systems under international humanitarian law. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 7(3), 351–368. https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/citahukum/article/view/11725

Ichsan, A., Eko, E. P., Susilo, T., Tumpak, D., & Ramadhanus, W. (2025). Dari Atas ke Bawah: Dimensi Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Pemimpin Militer atas Pelanggaran Pasukan. Journal of Law and Nation (JOLN), 4(2), 352–370.

Juwana, H. (2004). Konsep Tanggung Jawab Pimpinan dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional: Kajian atas Penerapan di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 1(4), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol1.4.564

Kaban, G. P. (2018). Unsur-Unsur Tanggung Jawab Komando di Dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional (Studi Putusan The Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo/ICC-01/05-01/08). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 1(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol1.no2.p156-170

Manekin, J., Wahyudi, H., Khakim, K., Susilo, T., Zulkifli, & Tunggul Wiratama, W. (2025). Tantangan Hukum Humaniter dalam Menghadapi Perang Asimetris: Analisis dan Solusi. Jurnal Manajemen, Ekonomi, Hukum, Kewirausahaan, Kesehatan, Pendidikan Dan Informatika (MANEKIN), 3(3), 212–217. https://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/manekin/article/view/5261

Marzuki, S. (2017). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia (PUSHAM UII).

Mettraux, G. (2009). The law of command responsibility. Oxford University Press.

Pramita, S. A. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Komando dan Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan: Analisis Dualisme Tanggung Jawab dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 12(7), 21–30. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/131

Putri, A. M., & DH, A. Z. (2025). Genosdia Srebrenica: Pertarungan Identitas Agama dan Politik. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Mahasiswa Sejarah Peradaban Islam (KONMASPI), 2(1), 964–974. https://proceedings.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/konmaspi/article/view/4031

Putri, T. R., HZ, E. D., & Jayakusuma, Z. (2023). Kedudukan Negara Bukan Peserta Statuta Roma 1998 dalam Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(16), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8264997

Rachmawati, R. A., Saragih, H. J. R., Yanca, I. G. S. K., & Widodo, P. (2023). Analysis of Bosnia-Herzegovina armed conflict. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.797

Robinson, D. (2012). How command responsibility got so complicated: A culpability contradiction, its obfuscation, and a simple solution. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 13(1), 1–58.

Sari, K. D. Y., & Swardhana, G. M. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Komando atau Atasan Menurut International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia dalam Kasus Kejahatan Perang yang Dilakukan oleh Zlatko Aleksovski di Bosnia. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 1–6.

Schomburg, W. (2005, April 18). Remarks on the charging of international crimes. International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/node/194042

Setyawan, E. S., Parinussa, J., Susilo, T., Sultan Alimudin, A., & Amperawan, C. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Komando dalam Hukum Humaniter Nasional: Studi Tentang Kewajiban Pemimpin Militer atas Tindakan Pasukannya. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 4307–4318. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/26445

Susilowati, I., Adillah, S. S. C., Harlinawati, N. T., & Azzahra, S. (2025). Peran Internasional Court of Justice terhadap Perlindungan Minority Right dalam Konflik Bosnia dan Serbia. Jurnal Studi Multidisipliner, 9(12), 454–462. https://oaj.jurnalhst.com/index.php/jsm/article/view/18154

Triadi, I., & Arafah, Y. A. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Komando dalam Pelanggaran Berat HAM oleh Prajurit Militer. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(10), 141–150. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/causa/article/view/1579

van der Wilt, H. G. (2007). Halilović on appeal: The intricate concept of “effective control”. Hague Justice Journal, 2(3), 151–155.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.