Dispensasi Nikah dan Disfungsi Regulasi Usia Nikah: Telaah Putusan Pengadilan Agama Boyolali Perspektif Teori Sistem Jasser Auda Marriage Dispensation and the Dysfunction of Marriage Age Regulation: A Review of the Boyolali Religious Court Decision from the Perspective of Jasser Auda's Systems Theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
The increase in the minimum age of marriage to 19 years through Law Number 16 of 2019 is a legal policy aimed at strengthening child protection, preventing early marriage, and improving family quality. However, the increasing practice of marriage dispensation raises issues regarding the effectiveness of this regulation in achieving the expected legal objectives. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of marriage dispensation after the enactment of Law Number 16 of 2019 and to examine judges’ considerations from the perspective of Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-syarī'ah system. This study is empirical legal research using a socio-legal research approach. Primary data were obtained through the analysis of three decisions of the Boyolali Religious Court, namely Decision Number 171/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi, Decision Number 19/Pdt.P/2026/PA.Bi, and Decision Number 110/Pdt.P/2026/PA.Bi, which were selected purposively because they represent variations in the reasons for granting marriage dispensation. The data were analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing using the perspective of Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-syarī'ah system. The results showed that the practice of marriage dispensation is still dominated by considerations of pregnancy outside marriage, biological relations between prospective spouses, concerns about the occurrence of prohibited acts, and considerations of public benefit that are casuistic in nature. This condition indicates that the phrase “urgent reasons” does not yet have clear operational parameters, thereby opening wide room for judicial discretion. As a result, marriage dispensation has undergone a functional shift from an exception mechanism to a legal instrument that is relatively frequently used to legitimize underage marriage. From the perspective of Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-syarī'ah system, the implementation of the regulation has not fully realized child protection and public benefit comprehensively because it is more oriented toward resolving short-term problems than achieving long-term legal objectives. The conclusion of this study affirms the need to strengthen the parameters of “urgent reasons” and ensure consistency in applying the principle of the best interests of the child so that marriage dispensation can return to its function as an exceptional legal mechanism and support the effectiveness of the policy limiting the minimum age of marriage.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alamudi, I. A. (2024). Intellectual development of Maqashid Al-Syariah: A thought of Jaseer Auda. TAWAZUN: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 7(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v7i2.28705
Aminuddin, N. I., Abdillah, M. S., & Saharuddin. (2026). Pernikahan Secara Virtual Reality Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. AL-MABSUTH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab, 2(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.36701/mabsuth.v2i1.2608
Artiyanto, A., & Kuswendi, A. (2024). Efektivitas UU No. 16 Tahun 2019 untuk Menekan Angka Perkawinan Dini. Syariahku: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 25–33.
Ashari, H. (2024). Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Alasan Sangat Mendesak pada Perkara Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(2), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i2.3389
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Farabi, A. (2025). The autonomy of Indonesian Islamic Court: Inventing and refining ‘broken marriage’ as a unilateral and no-fault divorce ground. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 18(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2025.18201
Heuvelman, S. S., Betaubun, R. M. N., & Pujiati, S. (2025). Konstruksi Identitas Keluarga di Media Sosial: Analisis Sosiologi Hukum tentang Perlindungan Privasi dan Dampak Regulasi Digital. Papsel Law Journal, 1(2), 67–75. https://journal.papsel.org/index.php/PLJ/article/view/177
Hidayat, A., Evendi, W., & Aliyah, N. D. (2024). Dispensasi Kawin dengan Alasan Sangat Mendesak di Mojokerto: Analisis Yuridis atas PERMA No. 5 Tahun 2019. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.9416
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Marzuki, S. (2010). Politik Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Masa Lalu: Melanggengkan Impunity. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 17(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art1
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mustakim, A., & Kholipah, N. (2022). Konsep Khitbah dalam Islam. JAS MERAH: Jurnal Hukum dan Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah, 1(2), 27–47. https://ejournal.staidapondokkrempyang.ac.id/index.php/jmjh/article/view/141
Nashuha, A. A., Muthoifin, & Elbanna, M. (2025). An analysis of Jasser Auda’s thought on Maqashid Sharia and its implications for Sharia economic law. Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v3i03.361
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rahmadani, K. A. (2025). Peminangan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam: Antara Legalitas yang Tidak Mengikat dan Realitas Sosial yang Mengikat. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(12), 2469–2476. https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/20007
Ramelan, R., & Nurtsani, R. (2024). Disfungsi Dispensasi Kawin dalam Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak di Indonesia. Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 8(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.19109/ujhki.v8i1.23274
Samnuzulsari, T., Oktariyani, S., & Safitri, A. (2025). Child marriage in Indonesia and its contributing factors: A literature review approach. TEMALI: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 8(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v8i1.36397
Sari, K., Fajarningtiyas, D. N., & Riany, Y. E. (2025). Assessing child marriage in Indonesia: A call for educational empowerment. KEMAS: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 20(3), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v20i3.14145
Sholehah, W., & Ubaidillah, L. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terkait Alasan Mendesak dalam Pengajuan Dispensasi Kawin dalam Pasal 7 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i1.2949
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Kencana.
Zumrotun, S., & Widiyanto, A. (2024). Islam dan Negara: Negosiasi Dispensasi Nikah pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia. Lentera, 6(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v6i2.9337




















