Dispensasi Nikah dan Disfungsi Regulasi Usia Nikah: Telaah Putusan Pengadilan Agama Boyolali Perspektif Teori Sistem Jasser Auda Marriage Dispensation and the Dysfunction of Marriage Age Regulation: A Review of the Boyolali Religious Court Decision from the Perspective of Jasser Auda's Systems Theory

Main Article Content


Abstract

The increase in the minimum age of marriage to 19 years through Law Number 16 of 2019 is a legal policy aimed at strengthening child protection, preventing early marriage, and improving family quality. However, the increasing practice of marriage dispensation raises issues regarding the effectiveness of this regulation in achieving the expected legal objectives. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of marriage dispensation after the enactment of Law Number 16 of 2019 and to examine judges’ considerations from the perspective of Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-syarī'ah system. This study is empirical legal research using a socio-legal research approach. Primary data were obtained through the analysis of three decisions of the Boyolali Religious Court, namely Decision Number 171/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi, Decision Number 19/Pdt.P/2026/PA.Bi, and Decision Number 110/Pdt.P/2026/PA.Bi, which were selected purposively because they represent variations in the reasons for granting marriage dispensation. The data were analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing using the perspective of Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-syarī'ah system. The results showed that the practice of marriage dispensation is still dominated by considerations of pregnancy outside marriage, biological relations between prospective spouses, concerns about the occurrence of prohibited acts, and considerations of public benefit that are casuistic in nature. This condition indicates that the phrase “urgent reasons” does not yet have clear operational parameters, thereby opening wide room for judicial discretion. As a result, marriage dispensation has undergone a functional shift from an exception mechanism to a legal instrument that is relatively frequently used to legitimize underage marriage. From the perspective of Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-syarī'ah system, the implementation of the regulation has not fully realized child protection and public benefit comprehensively because it is more oriented toward resolving short-term problems than achieving long-term legal objectives. The conclusion of this study affirms the need to strengthen the parameters of “urgent reasons” and ensure consistency in applying the principle of the best interests of the child so that marriage dispensation can return to its function as an exceptional legal mechanism and support the effectiveness of the policy limiting the minimum age of marriage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Purnama Y.A. (2026)
    Unregistered and Online Marriage in Indonesia: An Islamic Law and Legal Perspective Based on the Principle of Al-Masyaqqah Tajlibu al-Taysīr
    Mawaddah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 43-67
  2. Lialiouti Z. (2026)
    A Means to an End or a Means in Itself? Nuclear Science and Space Exploration in the Context of US Cultural Diplomacy in Greece, 1955–1967
    Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 44(1), 195-224
  3. Davletshina L.K. (2026)
    The Structural Core of the Contemporary Tatar Wedding Ritual in the Common Turkic Context
    New Research of Tuva(1), 399-410

Article Details

How to Cite
Mahmuduzzaman, M., & Zumrotun, S. (2026). Dispensasi Nikah dan Disfungsi Regulasi Usia Nikah: Telaah Putusan Pengadilan Agama Boyolali Perspektif Teori Sistem Jasser Auda. AHKAM, 5(3), 3370-3394. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11082

References

Alamudi, I. A. (2024). Intellectual development of Maqashid Al-Syariah: A thought of Jaseer Auda. TAWAZUN: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 7(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v7i2.28705

Aminuddin, N. I., Abdillah, M. S., & Saharuddin. (2026). Pernikahan Secara Virtual Reality Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. AL-MABSUTH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab, 2(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.36701/mabsuth.v2i1.2608

Artiyanto, A., & Kuswendi, A. (2024). Efektivitas UU No. 16 Tahun 2019 untuk Menekan Angka Perkawinan Dini. Syariahku: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 25–33.

Ashari, H. (2024). Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Alasan Sangat Mendesak pada Perkara Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(2), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i2.3389

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Farabi, A. (2025). The autonomy of Indonesian Islamic Court: Inventing and refining ‘broken marriage’ as a unilateral and no-fault divorce ground. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 18(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2025.18201

Heuvelman, S. S., Betaubun, R. M. N., & Pujiati, S. (2025). Konstruksi Identitas Keluarga di Media Sosial: Analisis Sosiologi Hukum tentang Perlindungan Privasi dan Dampak Regulasi Digital. Papsel Law Journal, 1(2), 67–75. https://journal.papsel.org/index.php/PLJ/article/view/177

Hidayat, A., Evendi, W., & Aliyah, N. D. (2024). Dispensasi Kawin dengan Alasan Sangat Mendesak di Mojokerto: Analisis Yuridis atas PERMA No. 5 Tahun 2019. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.9416

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Marzuki, S. (2010). Politik Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Masa Lalu: Melanggengkan Impunity. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 17(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art1

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mustakim, A., & Kholipah, N. (2022). Konsep Khitbah dalam Islam. JAS MERAH: Jurnal Hukum dan Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah, 1(2), 27–47. https://ejournal.staidapondokkrempyang.ac.id/index.php/jmjh/article/view/141

Nashuha, A. A., Muthoifin, & Elbanna, M. (2025). An analysis of Jasser Auda’s thought on Maqashid Sharia and its implications for Sharia economic law. Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v3i03.361

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rahmadani, K. A. (2025). Peminangan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam: Antara Legalitas yang Tidak Mengikat dan Realitas Sosial yang Mengikat. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(12), 2469–2476. https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/20007

Ramelan, R., & Nurtsani, R. (2024). Disfungsi Dispensasi Kawin dalam Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak di Indonesia. Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 8(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.19109/ujhki.v8i1.23274

Samnuzulsari, T., Oktariyani, S., & Safitri, A. (2025). Child marriage in Indonesia and its contributing factors: A literature review approach. TEMALI: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 8(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v8i1.36397

Sari, K., Fajarningtiyas, D. N., & Riany, Y. E. (2025). Assessing child marriage in Indonesia: A call for educational empowerment. KEMAS: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 20(3), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v20i3.14145

Sholehah, W., & Ubaidillah, L. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terkait Alasan Mendesak dalam Pengajuan Dispensasi Kawin dalam Pasal 7 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i1.2949

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Kencana.

Zumrotun, S., & Widiyanto, A. (2024). Islam dan Negara: Negosiasi Dispensasi Nikah pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia. Lentera, 6(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v6i2.9337


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.