Analisis terhadap Putusan PA Koto Baru Nomor 18/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Kbr tentang Penolakan Dispensasi Nikah Pasca Khalwat Perspektif Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah Analysis of Koto Baru PA Decision Number 18/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Kbr on the Rejection of Marriage Dispensation Following Khalwat from the Perspective of Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3536-3548
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11234
Viewed: 4 times
Downloaded: 1 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Yudia Permata Sari1*, Maizul Imran2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although marriage dispensation has received considerable attention in various studies of Islamic family law, research specifically examining the rejection of marriage dispensation following khalwat from the perspective of sadd al-dzari’ah remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the judge’s considerations in Koto Baru Religious Court Determination Number 18/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Kbr concerning the rejection of marriage dispensation following khalwat and to examine the determination from the perspective of sadd al-dzari’ah. The study employed a qualitative approach with a legal case study design. Data were obtained through observation, semistructured interviews with the judge who handled the case, and documentation comprising the court determination and relevant laws and regulations. The data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis through the stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings showed that the rejection of marriage dispensation was based on the applicants’ failure to meet the minimum marriage age, the psychological immaturity of the prospective spouses, the protection of children’s rights, and the absence of urgent grounds as stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019. From the perspective of sadd al-dzari’ah, the judge’s determination reflected an effort to block avenues that could potentially cause greater harm in order to realize public benefit and child protection. This study confirms that judicial considerations in marriage dispensation cases are oriented not only toward formal legal aspects but also toward preventing harm and fulfilling the best interests of the child. These findings contribute to the development of Islamic family law studies, particularly regarding the application of sadd al-dzari’ah in resolving marriage dispensation cases, and imply the importance of judicial consistency in prioritizing the principles of child protection and public benefit in every examination of a marriage dispensation application.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abubakar, A. (2022). Dispensasi Kawin dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Anak Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019. Jurnal Al-’Adalah, 19(2), 215–232.
Aristoni. (2021). Dispensasi Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Perlindungan Anak. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 15(2), 245–260.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hidayat, R. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Anak dalam Perkara Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(3), 329–346.
Jalili, I. (2020). Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah sebagai Metode Istinbath Hukum Islam dalam Menghadapi Problematika Kontemporer. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2), 213–228.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2020). Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/206071/perma-no-5-tahun-2019
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rafid, N. A. (2020). Dispensasi Nikah dalam Perspektif Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 13(2), 155–170.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Takhim, M. (2019). Konsep Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah dalam Hukum Islam dan Implementasinya pada Persoalan Kontemporer. YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 10(1), 19–34.
Umam, A. K. (2023). Dispensasi Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Kemaslahatan dan Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 33(1), 65–82.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. (2019). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/122740/uu-no-16-tahun-2019
Wahyudi, A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dalam Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(3), 521–541.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yusanto, Y. (2020). Ragam Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif. Journal of Scientific Communication (JSC), 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31506/jsc.v1i1.7764