Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemberian Keterangan Palsu secara Menyesatkan kepada Penerima Fidusia ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 (Studi Putusan Nomor 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk) Legal Accountability of Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Providing Misleading False Information to Fiduciary Recipients in the Perspective of Law Number 42 of 1999 (Case Study of Decision Number 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
887-903
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.6820
Viewed: 309 times
Downloaded: 108 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Leicha Yarra1*, Zainab Ompu Jainah2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study is motivated by the legal accountability issues surrounding perpetrators of criminal acts involving the provision of misleading false statements to fiduciary recipients, which constitutes a violation of the principle of trust in fiduciary security agreements. Providing false information not only causes legal and economic harm to the fiduciary recipient but also undermines the validity of the collateral object itself. The objective of this research is to analyze the forms of legal accountability imposed on such offenders based on Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security, through a case study of Decision Number 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk in the Bandar Lampung jurisdiction. The research employs a normative juridical method, using statutory, legal theory, and judicial decision approaches. The findings indicate that perpetrators may be subject to criminal sanctions under Article 35 of Law Number 42 of 1999 and, in specific cases, may also be charged under provisions in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) relating to fraud or data falsification. Legal enforcement against such offenders is essential to create a deterrent effect and to ensure legal protection for fiduciary recipients. This study recommends stricter oversight of fiduciary agreement implementation and improved public legal literacy regarding the legal consequences of providing false information in fiduciary practices.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abdillah, M. R. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Berdasarkan Pasal 263 KUHP (Putusan 876/Pid.B/2019/PN Rap ). JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI, 8(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v8i2.1866
Adri, S., Karimi, S., & Indrawari, I. (2019). Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi terhadap Perilaku Kriminalitas (Tinjauan Literatur). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.005.02.7
Chazawi, A. (2016). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Chazawi, A., & Ferdian, A. (2019). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan. Grafindo Persada.
Harahap, D. A. (2021). Hilangnya Responsibilitas Pidana Oleh Pemberi Fidusia Yang Mengalihkan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Perjanjian Tertulis (Studi Putusan no. 3453/pid. Sus/2017/pn.mdn). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum [JIMHUM], 1(3), 64. https://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimhum/article/view/169
Harahap, R. H., Siregar, F. A., & Harahap, I. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Kejahatan Pencurian Berulang. Jurnal El-Thawalib, 1(1), 15.
Hidayah, N. P., & Komariah, K. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Hukum Masyarakat Tentang Peer to Peer Lending. Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22219/jdh.v2i1.20914
Husin, A. T. P., Hakim, L., & Ramasari, R. D. (2024). Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dengan Menggunakan Nama Orang Lain Untuk Keuntung Diri Sendiri (Studi Putusan Nomor: 71/Pid.B/2024/PN TJK). SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law, 1(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.57235/sakola.v1i2.3338
Jaya, A. E. N., Majid, I., & Klau, R. G. (2023). nalisis Hukuman Pidana Dalam Kasus Penyebaran Informasi Kesehatan Palsu Atau Menyesatkan. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), 1. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/6602
Kaligis, G. V. (2021). PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT MENURUT PASAL 263 KUHP. Lex Privatum, 9(4), 367. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/33357
Latukau, & dkk. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Atas Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Dibebani Fidusia Ulang Oleh Debitor Yang Sama. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 1(1), 4. https://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/issue/view/152
Moeljatno. (2017). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Nababan, A. S. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Akibat Hukum Musnahnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Studi Di Pt.Wom Finance, Tbk ). Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 4(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihap.v4i1.1634
Prasetyo, T. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Raga Grafindo Persada.
Pratama, O. (2025). Pengaruh Globalisasi Budaya Korea terhadap Pengembangan Wisata di Bandung: Analisis Sosial dan Ekonomi. Al-DYAS, 4(2), 958–973. https://doi.org/10.58578/aldyas.v4i2.5494
Syahdi Buamona. (2019). White Collar Crime (Kejahatan Kerah Putih) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Madani Legal Review, 3(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.31850/malrev.v3i1.343
Tarigan, R. Y., Syahrin, A., Purba, H., & Tony, T. (2023). Analisis Yuridis terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan surat yang dilakukan pegawai notaris (studi putusan PN Karanganyar NO.36/PID.B/2021/PN.KRG). Jurnal Normatif, 3(1), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.54123/jn.v3i1.272
Winjaya Laksana, A., Ikraam, A., & Robbani, A. (2024). The Liability of Criminal Law for Perpetrators of Goods Embezzlement. Journal of Justice Dialectical, 2(2), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.70720/jjd.v2i2.50
Yusuf, M., Manfaluthi, A., & Dewi H, T. (2024). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Pelaku Pemalsuan Dokumen Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Putusan Nomor 520/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Smn). Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 5(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v5i1.2998