Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The reform of the Criminal Code (KUHP) needs to consider the principle of justice for the people so that criminal regulation does not become an instrument serving the interests of officials who formulate the rules. This study aims to examine changes to the KUHP in relation to the challenges of constitutionality from the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah and to analyze them through the framework of Islamic legal politics. This study used a normative juridical method with conceptual and statutory approaches. The focus of the study was directed at material issues in the articles of the new National KUHP as regulated in Law Number 1 of 2023 and Law Number 1 of 2026 concerning Criminal Adjustment. The research data were analyzed descriptively and normatively by examining the conformity of the substance of criminal regulation with the principles of constitutionality, legal justice, and the values of Islamic legal politics. The results showed that the existence of the new KUHP of 2023 still leaves crucial issues, although it has been accompanied by criminal adjustment regulations in 2026. These issues relate to the need to ensure that criminal law reform remains oriented toward the interests of the people, is in line with the principle of constitutional justice, and does not create room for abuse of authority in the formation or application of law. These findings contribute to the development of studies on national criminal law and siyasah dusturiyah, particularly in assessing the direction of KUHP reform based on the principles of justice, public benefit, and protection of community rights. The implications of this study affirm the importance of strengthening normative evaluation of the substance of the KUHP so that national criminal law reform truly reflects substantive justice and the public interest.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 10359.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ramli A.F. (2026)
    TERMINOLOGICAL DRIFT AND THE REORDERING OF KNOWLEDGE FROM AL-GHAZALI’S PERSPECTIVE
    Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 11(4)
  2. Lateh H.M. (2026)
    Evaluation of Muqaddimah fi Intizam al-Waza‘if al-Mulk as the Source of the Formation of the Constitution of Johor 1895
    Journal of Al Tamaddun, 21(2), 143-154
  3. Othman F. (2026)
    Islamic Encyclopaedic Works in the Malay World before the 20th Century
    Journal of Al Tamaddun, 21(2), 1-14

Article Details

How to Cite
Junmawalidin, J. (2026). Revolusi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana terhadap Tantangan Konstitusionalitas dalam Kajian Siyasah Dusturiyah. AHKAM, 5(3), 2319-2333. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10359

References

Aldani, R., Nurhikma, & Putri, S. E. (2024). Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah, 5(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v5i2.13202

Amin, N. F., Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). Konsep Umum Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian. PILAR, 14(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.26618/whw41w62

Ardie, H. J., & Hasan, Z. (2025). KUHP Baru dan Tantangan bagi Profesi Advokat: Studi Atas Penolakan MK terhadap Pengujian Pasal 509. Journal of Education and Humanities (JEH) Terekam Jejak, 1(1), 126–135. https://jpm.terekamjejak.com/index.php/jeh/article/view/86

Aripkah, N., Maulana, M. R., & Sudiarsana, I. K. (2026). Implikasi Yuridis Pedoman Pemidanaan KUHP Nasional terhadap Eksistensi Ketentuan Pidana Minimal Khusus. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 7(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v7i1.6187

Barasa, A. R. P., & Saputra, W. (2025). Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 6(3), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v6i3.28788

Begouvic, M. E. H. (2022). Pembuatan Undang-Undang dalam Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. LEX SUPERIOR, 1(1), 58–75. https://ojs.ukb.ac.id/index.php/jls/article/view/489

Hidayatulloh, A. W., Cahyadi, C., Nugraha, D., Safaat, G., & Komarudin, K. (2026). Pengesahan KUHP Baru: Antara Kedaulatan Hukum Nasional dan Pelanggaran Prinsip-Prinsip Demokrasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 14(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v14i1.21123

Irawan, F., Saebani, B. A., & Alamsyah, T. (2024). Tinjauan Siyasah Dusturiyah terhadap Pelaksanaan Asas Keseimbangan dan Profesionalitas Pelayanan Publik di Kecamatan Naringgul Berdasarkan Pasal 4 Perda Kabupaten Cianjur Nomor 6 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pelayanan Publik. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8165–8173. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1705

Jaidi, M., Hasan, A., Umar, M., & Khasyi’in, N. (2024). Kedudukan Siyasah Dusturiyyah Studi Kasus Politisasi Pemilu 2024 Analisis Peradilan Hukum Islam. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(2), 662–683. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i2.543

Lubis, A. A. A. M. R. (2019). Ilmu hukum dalam simpul siyasah dusturiyah: Refleksi atas teori dan praktek hukum tata negara di Indonesia. Semesta Aksara. https://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/615/1/Ilmu%20Hukum%20dalam%20Sampul%20Siyasah%20Dusturiyah.pdf

Nasir, L., Rijal, S., & Akbar, M. A. (2025). Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(2), 622–638. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11333

Nugraha, R. S., Rohaedi, E., Kusnadi, N., & Abid, A. (2025). Transformasi Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia: Perbandingan Komprehensif antara KUHP Lama dan KUHP Baru. Reformasi Hukum, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1169

Sumadi, A. F. (2016). Hukum dan Keadilan Sosial dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketatanegaraan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 849–871. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1249

Wirawan, W., & Saragih, Y. M. (2025). Revolusi Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Komprehensif KUHP Baru 2023. Penerbit Tahta Media. https://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/1634

Yuntho, E., Gofar, F. A., Eddyono, S. W., & Wagiman, W. (2007). Dinamika pembaruan KUHP dan problematikanya: Catatan hasil konsultasi publik nasional perlindungan HAM melalui reformasi KUHP. ELSAM & Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHP. https://perpustakaan.elsam.or.id/repository/200712_BUK_Dinamika-Pembaruan-KUHP-dan-Problematikanya--Catatan-Hasil.pdf