Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan CCTV sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perspektif UU ITE dan Hukum Islam Juridical Analysis of the Status of CCTV as Electronic Evidence from the Perspective of UU ITE and Islamic Law
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV) as electronic evidence has been widely examined under Indonesian positive law, research integrating the provisions of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (the ITE Law) with the concept of qarinah in Islamic law remains limited. This study aims to analyze the legal status of CCTV as electronic evidence under the ITE Law and examine the legitimacy of its use from the perspective of Islamic law. This study employed a legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and shar‘i approaches. Data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials were analyzed qualitatively. The results demonstrate that CCTV constitutes valid electronic evidence under Article 5 of the ITE Law and serves as an extension of the forms of evidence recognized in Indonesian criminal procedural law. Under Islamic law, CCTV may be classified as qarinah, or an indication, that possesses evidentiary value provided that it satisfies the principles of authenticity, integrity, and information validity. The use of CCTV is also consistent with maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, particularly the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), the protection of property (ḥifẓ al-māl), and the realization of justice (al-‘adl). These findings affirm that the concept of qarinah is adaptable to technological developments and can support the harmonization of Indonesian positive law and Islamic law within modern evidentiary systems. Accordingly, the legitimacy of CCTV has mutually reinforcing juridical and normative foundations for supporting legal certainty, justice, and public benefit. This study contributes to the development of electronic evidence law and may serve as a reference for law enforcement practices in Indonesia.
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Bhargavan A. (2027)A CCTV based early warning framework for crowd safety in high density religious eventsSafety Science, 205
-
Linh T.K. (2027)Enhancing YOLOv11n for Reliable Child Detection in Noisy Surveillance FootageCommunications in Computer and Information Science, 2914 CCIS, 418-429
-
Jang Y.J. (2027)Delta-Attention-Block-based time series forecasting model for automatic risk zone detectionInformation Processing and Management, 64(1)
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abikan, Y. I. (2023). Examining the admissibility or otherwise of evidence generated from closed-circuit television (CCTV) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test as means of proof of zina under Islamic law. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 17(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i1.8172
Al-Faruq, A. (2014). Hukum Acara Peradilan Islam. Pustaka Yustisia.
al-Jauziyyah, I. Q. (2002). Al-Thuruq al-Hukmiyyah fi al-Siyasah al-Syar’iyyah. Dar al-Fikr.
Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Jejak.
Ash-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (1997). Peradilan dan Hukum Acara Islam. Pustaka Rizki Putra.
Chodir, F., & Ahwadzy, M. A. (2025). Konsep Qarīnah sebagai Alat Bukti Pembunuhan dalam Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia: Studi atas Kasus Jessica-Mirna. Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies, 3(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.61570/syariah.v3i1.138
Farhan, M. R., Putra, P. S., & Susilawati, S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Rekaman Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan: Studi Putusan Nomor 5/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mdn. Jurnal Hukum Al-Hikmah, 5(4). https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/alhikmah/article/view/10869
Fernando, D., Heniarti, D. D., & Zakaria, C. A. F. (2025). Transformasi Alat Bukti Elektronik Menggunakan Digital Forensik dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana. Journal Justiciabelen, 5(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v5i01.5506
Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Sinar Grafika.
Hardianta, H., Zulfan, Z., & Subaidi, J. (2025). Analisis Hukum terhadap Kedudukan Rekaman CCTV sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan: Analisis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 813 K/Pid/2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v8i3.22224
Harizona, D. (2018). Kekuatan Bukti Elektronik sebagai Bukti di Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana dan Hukum Islam (Penggunaan Rekaman Gambar Closed Circuit Television). Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial dan Sains, 7(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v7i1.2342
Herlambang, P. H., Utama, Y. J., & Putrijanti, A. (2024). Harmonisasi Hukum UU Peratun dan UU ITE dalam Ketentuan Alat Bukti Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti Tambahan dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 6(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v6i1.61-81
Ilyas, A. (2018). Hukum Acara Pidana. Pustaka Refleksi.
Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Muhammad, A. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nuriskandar, L. H. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Pembuktian secara Qarinah di Terengganu (Malaysia) dan Aceh (Indonesia). Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab, 1(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.59259/jd.v1i2.10
Nurjanah, D. B., & Masrukhin. (2026). Penanganan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online melalui Alat Bukti Digital di Kepolisian Surakarta: Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Legalite: Jurnal Perundang-Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 11(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v11i1.13733
Pratiwi, S., & Patmawanti, B. (2024). Legal review of the use of closed-circuit television as electronic evidence in proving criminal acts in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 4(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.69989/8kajvb41
Sabiq, S. (2008). Fiqh al-Sunnah. Dar al-Fikr.
Setiawan, M. N., Lasmadi, S., Sudarti, E., Liyus, H., & Putra, A. K. (2025). Validitas Bukti Digital Closed Circuit Television dalam Praktik Penegakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v9i2.12661
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Nor Muhamad, N. H., Alias, M. A. A., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2026). The role of digital forensics as qarinah muasirah in proving cyber offences under Malaysian Islamic evidence law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 11(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v11i1.14738
Umar, M. N. (2015). Qarinah as evidence in deciding case. Ar-Raniry: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.22373/jar.v2i2.7493
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. (1981). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/47041/uu-no-8-tahun-1981
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2008). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37589/uu-no-11-tahun-2008
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37582/uu-no-19-tahun-2016
Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Abdul Shukor, S., Hashim, H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2018). Pembuktian Melalui Televisyen/Kamera Litar Tertutup (CCTV) dalam Kes-Kes Jenayah: Tinjauan Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol6no1.101
Zuhaili, M. (2011). Al-Mu’tamad fi al-Fiqh al-Syafi’i. Dar al-Qalam.
Zuhaili, M. (2012). Tarikh al-Qadha’ fi al-Islam. Dar al-Qalam.






















