Toward a Digital-Enabled Evaluation Model for Graduate Education Quality: A Study of Chinese Universities
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the context of high-quality development in higher education, evaluating graduate education quality has become increasingly important for assessing the cultivation of high-level talent. This study aimed to construct a graduate education quality evaluation system grounded in comprehensive competency development, encompassing five key dimensions: digital awareness, digital technology knowledge and skills, digital application, digital social responsibility, and professional development. The study employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine indicator weights, Data Envelopment Analysis to measure institutional efficiency across China, panel regression to identify factors influencing educational value-added, and K-means clustering to reveal patterns of resource allocation. The findings indicate that digital technology knowledge and skills, together with digital application, carry the highest weights in the evaluation system. The results further show substantial variation in efficiency across institution types and regions, while also demonstrating that high investment does not necessarily translate into high educational value-added, thereby underscoring the importance of resource utilization efficiency and appropriate training models. The study concludes that a more differentiated evaluation mechanism and optimized resource allocation are necessary to enhance graduate education quality. These findings provide a scientific basis for improving graduate education evaluation and offer practical implications for policy and institutional quality enhancement.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Albers, M., Reitsma, M., Benning, K., Gobbens, R. J. J., Timmermans, O. A. A. M. J., & Nies, H. L. G. R. (2024). Developing a theory of change model for a learning and innovation network: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 77, 103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103954
Chauveron, L. M., Samtani, S., Groner, M. G., Urban, J. B., & Linver, M. R. (2021). Including diverse stakeholder voices in youth character program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020917218
Ferreira, A., Araújo, B., Alves, J., Principe, F., Mota, L., & Novais, S. (2023). Peer feedback: Model for the assessment and development of metacognitive competences in nursing students in clinical training. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121219
Li, X., Zhang, S., Yu, Q., et al. (2024). Research on the evaluation system of the cultivation quality of master’s degree candidates in schools. Bulletin of Chinese Psychological Sciences, 2(4), 35–38.
Shi, Y., & Niu, Y. (2023). Research on the quality assurance system of postgraduate education based on PDCA cycle—A case study of a university in Beijing. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 18–23.
Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Liu, H. (2022). Construction of a three-dimensional evaluation model for postgraduate education quality under the background of “double first-class”. Journal of Graduate Education, 3(1), 56–62.
Wu, M. (2022). Study on Hopf branch of stability of time-delay unified system and performance evaluation based on deep learning. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2173900
Zhang, M., Li, N., Wang, J., & Yang, W. (2025). Research on optimization of teaching quality monitoring system in normal universities based on PDCA cycle theory. Information and Communication Technology for Education, 13(3).
Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. (2020). Research on graduate education quality evaluation based on combination empowerment and comprehensive fuzzy model. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 768(5), 052003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/768/5/052003














