Toward a Digital-Enabled Evaluation Model for Graduate Education Quality: A Study of Chinese Universities

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

In the context of high-quality development in higher education, evaluating graduate education quality has become increasingly important for assessing the cultivation of high-level talent. This study aimed to construct a graduate education quality evaluation system grounded in comprehensive competency development, encompassing five key dimensions: digital awareness, digital technology knowledge and skills, digital application, digital social responsibility, and professional development. The study employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine indicator weights, Data Envelopment Analysis to measure institutional efficiency across China, panel regression to identify factors influencing educational value-added, and K-means clustering to reveal patterns of resource allocation. The findings indicate that digital technology knowledge and skills, together with digital application, carry the highest weights in the evaluation system. The results further show substantial variation in efficiency across institution types and regions, while also demonstrating that high investment does not necessarily translate into high educational value-added, thereby underscoring the importance of resource utilization efficiency and appropriate training models. The study concludes that a more differentiated evaluation mechanism and optimized resource allocation are necessary to enhance graduate education quality. These findings provide a scientific basis for improving graduate education evaluation and offer practical implications for policy and institutional quality enhancement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Kusuma N.A. (2027)
    Exploring the acceptance of science teachers toward simulator-based technology
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Lukpanov R.E. (2027)
    Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall Block
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
  3. Thu T.T.T. (2027)
    Management accounting effectiveness in tourism enterprises: The roles of technology readiness, information technology infrastructure, and data quality in an ai-driven business environment
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Liao, Y., Quan, J., Chen, S., & Zeng, C. (2026). Toward a Digital-Enabled Evaluation Model for Graduate Education Quality: A Study of Chinese Universities. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 4(2), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v4i2.8980

References

Albers, M., Reitsma, M., Benning, K., Gobbens, R. J. J., Timmermans, O. A. A. M. J., & Nies, H. L. G. R. (2024). Developing a theory of change model for a learning and innovation network: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 77, 103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103954

Chauveron, L. M., Samtani, S., Groner, M. G., Urban, J. B., & Linver, M. R. (2021). Including diverse stakeholder voices in youth character program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020917218

Ferreira, A., Araújo, B., Alves, J., Principe, F., Mota, L., & Novais, S. (2023). Peer feedback: Model for the assessment and development of metacognitive competences in nursing students in clinical training. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121219

Li, X., Zhang, S., Yu, Q., et al. (2024). Research on the evaluation system of the cultivation quality of master’s degree candidates in schools. Bulletin of Chinese Psychological Sciences, 2(4), 35–38.

Shi, Y., & Niu, Y. (2023). Research on the quality assurance system of postgraduate education based on PDCA cycle—A case study of a university in Beijing. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 18–23.

Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Liu, H. (2022). Construction of a three-dimensional evaluation model for postgraduate education quality under the background of “double first-class”. Journal of Graduate Education, 3(1), 56–62.

Wu, M. (2022). Study on Hopf branch of stability of time-delay unified system and performance evaluation based on deep learning. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2173900

Zhang, M., Li, N., Wang, J., & Yang, W. (2025). Research on optimization of teaching quality monitoring system in normal universities based on PDCA cycle theory. Information and Communication Technology for Education, 13(3).

Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. (2020). Research on graduate education quality evaluation based on combination empowerment and comprehensive fuzzy model. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 768(5), 052003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/768/5/052003