Politeness Strategies in Lecturer–Student Interaction: A Sociopragmatic Study in Indonesian Higher Education

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 420-439
Download PDF
Published: Jun 17, 2026
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ijhess.v4i2.10704
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 81 times
Downloaded: 48 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Mantasiah Mantasiah1*
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Mantasiah Mantasiah
Makassar State University, Indonesia

Abstract

Although politeness strategies have been widely examined in pragmatic studies, research specifically addressing their sociopragmatic function in managing face-threatening acts within lecturer-student interaction in Indonesian higher education remains limited. This study aimed to examine how politeness strategies operate as sociopragmatic resources in managing face-threatening acts (FTAs) in classroom discourse. Using an interactional pragmatic framework, the study employed a qualitative discourse-analytic design based on naturally occurring classroom interactions. Data were collected through audio recordings of nine lecturers across three foreign-language education programmes, namely German, Arabic, and Mandarin Language Education, at one Indonesian university, totaling approximately 450 minutes of classroom discourse. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed sequentially to identify the realization of politeness strategies in institutional interaction. The findings reveal that lecturers deploy politeness strategies dynamically in response to instructional and institutional demands. Positive politeness predominates in instructional and corrective discourse (42%), bald-on-record strategies appear primarily in regulatory contexts (31%), negative politeness minimizes imposition in evaluative settings (14%), and off-record strategies indirectly regulate student behavior (13%). These patterns reflect sociopragmatic variation shaped by institutional roles, cultural expectations, and norms of appropriateness. The study concludes that politeness functions not only as an interpersonal strategy but also as a mechanism for negotiating institutional authority and relational alignment in classroom discourse. These findings contribute to sociopragmatic and classroom discourse scholarship by extending classical face-management models to institutional and hierarchical interaction in Indonesian higher education.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Wu Y. (2027)
    Strategies of Designing High-Efficiency Electrolyte Additives for Aqueous Magnesium Batteries: A Review
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  2. Naemi Z. (2027)
    The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing Curriculum
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
  3. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Mantasiah, M. (2026). Politeness Strategies in Lecturer–Student Interaction: A Sociopragmatic Study in Indonesian Higher Education. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 4(2), 420-439. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v4i2.10704

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Al-Abbas, L. S. (2023). Politeness strategies used by children in requests in relation to age and gender: A case study of Jordanian elementary school students. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1175599. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1175599

Alaiyed, M. A. (2024). Politeness strategies in email opening and closing moves by Saudi female EFL students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(9), 2834–2842. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1409.19

Al Rousan, R. M., Al-Awawdeh, N., Hassan, H., & AlRousan, M. (2024). “Good morning, my dear Dr.” Openings and closings in university students’ academic emails. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p99

Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752

Doval-Suárez, S., & González-Álvarez, E. (2024). “You have done a great job, but I would make some changes.” Concession and politeness in asynchronous online discussion forums. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 13(1), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.13.01.06

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Gosen, M. N., Willemsen, A., & Hiddink, F. (2025). Applying conversation analysis to classroom interactions: Students’ “oh”-prefaced utterances and the interactional management of explanations. Classroom Discourse, 16(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2397127

Haugh, M. (2024). (Im)politeness as object, (im)politeness as perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, 20(1), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2023-0082

House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2025). Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching, 58(3), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444822000477

Jucker, A. H. (2023). Conduct politeness versus etiquette politeness: A terminological distinction. Journal of Politeness Research, 20(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2023-0071

Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Lukman, L., Merling, A., Haryeni, H., Hasjim, M., & Indarwati, I. (2024). Addressing and politeness strategies in lecturer–student interaction on the WhatsApp platform: A pragmatics perspective. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 2169–2187. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3714

Maiklad, P., & Numtong, K. (2025). Politeness strategies in cross-cultural communication: A sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 21(1), 44–59.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238

Nikula, T. (2002). Teacher talk reflecting pragmatic awareness: A look at EFL and content-based classroom settings. Pragmatics, 12(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.12.4.03nik

Nursanti, E., Andriyanti, E., & Wijaya, I. A. (2023). (Im)politeness employed by multilingual Indonesian EFL learners in argumentative conversations. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 1000–1021. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.26033

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Sert, O., Gynne, A., & Larsson, M. (2025). Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: A discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 16(2), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2337184

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed.). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934085

Syting, C. J. O., & Gildore, P. J. E. (2022). Teachers’ linguistic politeness in classroom interaction: A pragmatic analysis. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p133

Terkourafi, M. (2024). Reconfiguring the strategic/non-strategic binary in im/politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 20(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2023-0070

van Dorst, I., Gillings, M., & Culpeper, J. (2024). Sociopragmatic variation in Britain: A corpus-based study of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 227, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.04.009

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184