Mapping the Landscape of Political Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis via Bibloshine
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Political transformation plays a critical role in shaping societies, yet there has been limited bibliometric exploration of its research trends. This study seeks to map the intellectual landscape of political transformation by examining key factors such as annual publications, influential sources, and emerging research topics. Methods: A systematic bibliometric approach was applied to analyze political transformation research published between 2014 and 2024. Data were extracted from Scopus, focusing on Open Access, English-language articles and book series within the Social Sciences. Analysis was performed using Biblioshiny to assess publication trends, institutional affiliations, citation patterns, and keyword dynamics. Results: The study identified an upward trend in political transformation publications, with key contributions from European countries and leading academic institutions. Keyword analysis revealed central themes like governance, political economy, and regional shifts. Collaboration networks highlighted increasing international cooperation, and citation analysis pinpointed influential works in the field. Conclusion: This research offers the political transformation field, revealing growing interdisciplinary collaboration and emerging themes. The findings highlight the field’s significant impact on both academia and policy-making.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Baturo, A., Kenny, P. D., & Balta, E. (2024). Leaders’ experience and the transition from populism to dictatorship. Democratization, 1–24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2391482
Bokobza, L., & Nyrup, J. (2024). Authoritarian multiparty governments. Democratization, 31(8), 1669-1694. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2338858
Calderon, C., & Butler, A. (2019). Politicising the landscape: a theoretical contribution towards the development of participation in landscape planning. Landscape Research, 2, 152-163. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2019.1594739
Filgueiras, F., Palotti, P., & Testa, G. G. (2023). Complexing Governance Styles: Connecting Politics and Policy in Governance Theories. Sage Open, 13(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158521
Gunitsky, S. (2013). Complexity and theories of change in international politics. International Theory, 5(1), 35 - 63. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971913000110
Keating, A., & Melis, G. (2017). Social media and youth political engagement: Preaching to the converted or providing a new voice for youth? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 877-894. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117718461
Martinez-Bravo, M., & Wantchekon, L. (2023). Political economy and structural transformation: democracy,regulation and public investment. Oxford Development Studies, 51(4), 417-435. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2023.2281590
Stirling, A. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 83-95. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001
Till, E. R., Andersson, M., & Tsakok, I. (2024). The Research Gap: Political Leadership and Agricultural Transformation. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69852-1_1
Timalsina, S. K. (2024). Approaches to Study Politics and Political Systems. Swarnadwar, 4(1), 98–113. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Personal/Downloads/swarnadwar4th_98-113.pdf




















