Measuring Leadership Behavior in Scientific Publication Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Biblioshiny

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study investigates trends and patterns in leadership behavior research within business contexts to clarify the field’s evolution and focal areas from 2017 to 2025. The research objective is to provide a systematic overview of publication dynamics, sources, contributing institutions and countries, and thematic structures guiding current and emerging scholarship. Methodologically, a systematic bibliometric approach was applied to peer-reviewed journal articles indexed in Scopus, with data retrieved on 16/08/2025 using a targeted query. Key findings show a general upward trajectory in publications, peaking in 2024, indicating growing scholarly interest; leading sources include Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and BMJ Leader. The University of Queensland, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam emerged as top contributing affiliations, with the UK and USA dominating country-level output. Keyword analysis highlights “leadership,” “human,” and demographic factors as central themes, while co-occurrence and thematic mapping delineate core, niche, and emerging areas spanning healthcare, gender, age, and innovation. The study concludes that leadership behavior research in business is expanding in volume and diversifying in focus. The contribution and implication are a consolidated roadmap that identifies influential outlets and actors, clarifies thematic contours, and informs future inquiry by pinpointing emergent domains and potential collaboration opportunities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Baltaev U.S. (2027)
    Extraction of P2O5 from the mineralized mass of the Central Kyzylkum using acidic wastewater generated from cotton soapstock processing: scientific analysis based on equilibrium principles
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 83-96
  2. Mirzahosseini M. (2027)
    A Review of Constitutive Modeling of Unsaturated Soils
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 81-128
  3. Kusuma N.A. (2027)
    Exploring the acceptance of science teachers toward simulator-based technology
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Khanal, S. R., & Soneja, S. (2025). Measuring Leadership Behavior in Scientific Publication Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Biblioshiny. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1123-1137. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7244

References

Abu Orabi, T., Salameh Almasarweh, M., Kamal Qteishat, M., Ahmad Qudah, H., & Zakaria AlQudah, M. (2024). Mapping leadership and organizational commitment trends: A bibliometric review. Administrative Sciences, 14(8), 171. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/8/171

Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (2018). The nature of leadership (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2017). Context and leadership: An examination using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 301–331.

Bolden, R., Hawkins, B., Gosling, J., & Taylor, S. (2018). Leadership in organizations: Current practices and future prospects. Routledge.

Day, D. V., & Antonakis, J. (2012). The nature of leadership (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Day, D. V., & Dragoni, L. (2015). Leadership development: An outcome-oriented review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 133–156.

DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52.

Ech-Chebany, M., & Lahlimi, Y.-K. (2025). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: A decade of scientific inquiry through a bibliometric analysis (2015–2024). International Journal of Applied Management and Economics, 2(14), 220–241. https://ijame.com/index.php/IJAME/article/view/225

Hoedemakers, J., Vanderstukken, A., & Stoffers, J. (2023). The influence of leadership on employees' employability: A bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review, and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1092865. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092865/full

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2004). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.

Luz, T. A., Mussi, C. C., & Soares, T. C. (2023). Knowledge management, innovation, and leadership: A bibliometric analysis. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 25(10), 55–63. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol25-issue10/Ser-1/F2510014555.pdf

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.