A Comparative Study of E-Books and Printed Books on Academic Performance: Perception from the University Students
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
295-311
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijhess.v3i1.4953
Viewed: 2.269 times
Downloaded: 543 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Nisha Saiju1, Nisha Tamang2, Pramit Tamang3, Piyush Bastola4, Preeti Bhattarai5, Dasarath Neupane6* 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rise of digital learning resources has led to ongoing debates about the effectiveness of e-books compared to printed books in academic performance. University students are increasingly using both formats, but their impact on learning outcomes remains a subject of interest. This study explores students’ perceptions of e-books and printed books and their influence on academic performance. A quantitative research approach was employed to examine the comparative impact of e-books and printed books on academic performance. A structured questionnaire was distributed both online and offline to collect primary data from 210 university students across Shanker Dev Campus, Pulchowk Engineering Campus, Saraswoti Multiple Campus, and KIST College. Demographic analysis revealed that 96.7% of participants were undergraduates, with a balanced gender distribution (54.5% female, 45.5% male). Descriptive statistics indicated that printed books received higher mean ratings compared to e-books, particularly in perceived academic utility. Correlation analysis showed a moderate positive relationship between e-book usage and academic performance (r = 0.406, p < 0.001) and between printed book usage and academic performance (r = 0.449, p < 0.001), suggesting that both formats contribute to learning outcomes, with printed books having a slightly stronger association. The study found that both e-books and printed books positively impact academic performance, with printed books demonstrating a marginally stronger correlation. While e-books offer convenience and accessibility, printed books remain preferred for deeper comprehension and retention. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach in integrating digital and traditional learning materials to optimize academic success.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Berg, S., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates' Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 518-525.
Dungworth, N., & Grimshaw, S. (2004). Electronic books: children’s reading practices and comprehension. School Libraries in View, 7-22.
Acharya, S., Shrestha, S. K., Neupane, D., & Mahat, D. (2024). Exploring Green Finance Practices for Advancing Sustainable Development in Nepalese Banking Sector. NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(8), 23-34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3126/nprcjmr.v1i8.73024
Courduff, J., & J. Rockinson- Szapkiw, A. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education, 259-266.
Dawd, S. (2016). The Promise of E-Platform Technology in Medical Education. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 173-178.
Healy, J. (1990). Endangered Minds: Why Our Children Don’t Think. Journal of Documentation, 700-712.
Holden, J. L. (2016). Buy the Book? Evidence on the Effect of Textbook Funding on School Level Achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics .
J. Rockinson- Szapki, A., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennet, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education, 259-266.
Jones, T., & Brown, C. (2011). Reading Engagement: A Comparison between E-Book and Trabitional Print Books in an Elementary Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 1308-1470.
Kang, Y., Wang, M., & Lin, R. (2009 ). Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays, 49-52.
Karki, T. B., Mello, L. D., Neupane, D., Shrestha, S. K., & Mahat, D. (2024). Exploring the Dynamics of Death Attitude Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Papers in Dimension (2015-2024). Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 5(3), 318-330.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology. New Age International Publisher.
Macedo-Rouet, M., Epstein, I., & Fayard, P. (2003). Effects of online reading on popular science comprehension. Science Communication, 99-128.
Mahat, D., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). Socio-culture and Women Career Development: References to Government Agencies of Nepal. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Socia Sciences, 7(2). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7041469
Mahat, D., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). Women’s Articulates towards Career Advancement. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 7(1), 417-424. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6640891
Mishra, S., Mahat, D., & Khanal, L. (2021). Employees Respect and Job satisfaction in Nepalese Private College. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(4), 45-52. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v4i4.43143
Mohammed , A., Shimaa Ahmed , S., & Rahmann, A. (2015). The effect of interactive e-book on students' achievement at Najran University in computer in education course. Journal of Education and Practice, 71-83.
Pandey, M. (2022). Effects of Anapana Meditation Technique in School Children. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 71-82.
Parajuli, S. K., Mahat, D., & Kandel, D. R. (2023). Innovation and technology management: investigate how organizations manage innovation and stay competitive in the modern business landscape. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(3), 339-345.
Parajuli, S. K., Mahat, D., & Lingden, B. (2022). Organization Learning, Dissemination of Knowledge and Organizational Performance in Nepalese Banking Sectors. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(5), 75-85.
Park, J., & Lee, J. (2021). Effects of E-Books and Printed Books on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Grammatical Knowledge. English Teaching, 35-61.
Rai, N., Khadka, N., Rai, M., Shrestha, P., Lekhak, M., Shrestha, M., & Mahat, D. (2024). Rise of Foreign Employment and Challenges Faced by Nepali Youth in the Domestic Job Market. International Journal of Applied and Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 2(7), 497-508.
Sackstein, S., Spark, L., & Jenkins, A. (2015). Are e-books effective tools for learning? Reading speed and comprehension: iPad®i vs. South African Journal of Education.
Shrestha, I., Pun, D., Basnet, I., Koirala, K., & Mahat, D. (2025). Adolescents in the Gaming Zone: A Study on Depression, Anxiety, Loneliness. International Journal of Applied Educational Research, 2(6), 439-454.
Shrestha, S. K., Mahat, D., Neupane, D., & Karki, T. B. (2024). E-wallet usage and customer purchase intention: Understanding the mediating role of shopping satisfaction and E-wallet structure. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(3). Retrieved from https://10.31893/multirev.2025091
Singhal, A., Jambunathan, P., & Manrai, M. (2019). E-Learning in medicine: are we ready to replace text books? J. Res. Med. Educ. Ethics., 212-215.
Smith, J. (2020). The impact of interactive e-books on student engagement a learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology, 40-50.