The Impact of Factionalism on Political Parties in Nepal
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
263-279
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijhess.v3i1.4915
Viewed: 232 times
Downloaded: 310 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Santa Bahadur Thapa1* 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores factionalism in Nepalese political parties and its causes and effects on party factions. Nepal’s political culture is rife with factionalism, splinter groups, and power struggles. The paper traces the historical development of factionalization from ideological conflict and personal rivalry. The paper segments society into groups based on ideology, personality, geography, and one-off issues. It analyzes the negative impact of factionalism on party discipline, stability, policymaking, and government. This paper examines the social non-linearities of leadership in factionalism and shows how their presence makes effective leadership essential to combatting factionalism's effects. This case study of major Nepalese political parties is technically an objective and practical demonstration of factionalism. A global perspective can enhance many of the firm conclusions based on case studies of factionalism within political parties in various countries. The paper suggests ways of dealing with and tackling the issue of factionalism, including the importance of keeping its internal democracy and communication and showing how to deal with elements that would not help. The paper concludes with possible driving factors behind this exclusive mirage of a political system. It suggests a few essential recommendations to subdue factionalism, like strengthening leadership, intra-party democracy, improving the legislative mechanisms, etc. It essentially places the responsibility on concern for factionalism, which can stymie effective government and dilute the moral legitimacy of democracy in Nepal.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Blais, A., & Massicotte, L. (2002). Electoral systems. In K. J. Newton & D. E. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies 2: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective (pp. 49-81). Sage Publications.
Carothers, T. (2006). The Programmatic Challenge of Political Party Development. Political Parties and Democracy, 8, 241–266.
Dalton, R. J. (2008). The Involved and the Apathetic: Youth and Political Engagement in America. Political Participation in America. In Youth & Participation: A New Perspective on Democracy (pp. 19–44). Cambridge University Press.
Heller, W. B. (2009). Democratic Transitions and Democratic Consolidation: Rethinking the Relationship. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1457-1480.
Sartori, G. (2005). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. ECPR Press.
Ceron, A. (2015). The Politics of Fission: An Analysis of Faction Breakaways among Italian Parties (1946–2011). British Journal of Political Science, ISSN: 1469–2112. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123413000215.
Chidex Awuzu, F. (2019). Leadership Issues and Organizational Dynamics That Shaped the 2016 Republican Primaries. PhD dissertation, Oklahoma University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissanddoc
Gherghina, S., Close, C., and Kopecký, P. (2019). The Dynamics and Dimensions of Intraparty Conflict: Introduction to the Special Issue. Party Politics, University of Glasgow. (doi:10.1177/1354068819836048).
H. Best, R. (2012). Negotiation in the Shadow of an Extremist Threat: Insurgencies and the Internal Commitment Problem. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. DOI: 10.17615/CHKB-BQ20.
Mixon, Jehdeiah (2016). Demise from Within: Factionalism in Maoist Parliamentary Politics in Nepal. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 2503. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2503?utm_source=digitalcollections.sit.edu%2Fisp_collection%2F2503&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Mueser, Benjamin Wolf Lehr. Let's Talk About It: Political Relationships in Nepal (2011). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 1066. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1066
Surya Prasad, P., & Prasad Pathak, S. (2012). Political Instability in Nepal: Examining the Roles of the Parties and Monarchy in the Second Democratic Period (1990-2002). The Journal of Social Sciences, 73, 149-170.
Welcome Ralo, M. (2012). Assessing Internal Contestations within the ANC: The Post-Polokwane Political Landscape: The Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality Case Study. Thamar University. https://core.ac.uk/download/145042427.pdf
Griffiths, M., & Hasan, M. (2015). Playing with fire: Islamism and politics in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 226–241.
Thapa, K. (2022). Democracy and political parties in Nepal. Journal of Nepalese Studies, 25(2), 120–135.