Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted traditional education, prompting a rapid shift toward blended learning. This study explores the efficacy of blended learning as a sustainable educational model in the post-COVID-19 era, focusing on flexibility, engagement, and accessibility challenges. This research aims to evaluate the benefits, challenges, and long-term impacts of blended learning, particularly in terms of student performance and teacher preparedness. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative data from 400 students through surveys and qualitative insights from 20 semi-structured interviews with educators and administrators. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis in NVivo software. The findings revealed that 87% of students appreciated the flexibility of blended learning, and there was a strong correlation between satisfaction and engagement (r = 0.72). However, 38% of students faced challenges with technology access, highlighting the digital divide. Educators emphasized the need for continuous professional development to implement blended learning effectively. In conclusion, blended learning offers significant advantages but requires improved accessibility and teacher support for long-term success. The research implications suggest that policymakers and institutions should prioritize equitable access to technology and ongoing teacher training to fully leverage the potential of blended learning in future educational models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
2
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Naemi Z. (2027)
    The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing Curriculum
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
  3. Kenzhaliyev B.K. (2027)
    Predicting Copper Production Cycles in Hydrometallurgy with Interpretable Machine Learning
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 5-15

Article Details

How to Cite
Sain, Z. H., Aziz, A. L., & Sain, S. H. (2024). Blended Learning in Post-COVID-19 Education: Evaluating Benefits, Challenges, and Long-Term Impacts on Students. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 2(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijemt.v2i3.3992

References

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., ... & Huang, B. (2014). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning for a Digital Age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2013). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 518-531.
Hassan Sain, Z., Sheikhmhuni Halahala, A., & Mas’ud, I. (2024). Blended Learning Adoption in Pakistani Universities: Challenges and Recommendations. ISRG Journal of Economics And Finance. 1(1), 12-17. Retrieved from: https://isrgpublishers.com/isrgjef-volume-i-issue-i-may-june-2024/
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58.
Hewitt, J., & Brett, C. (2007). Planning to Meet the Needs of Online Learners: A Qualitative Inquiry. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 215-227.
Johnson, L. (2021). A Comprehensive Guide to Online Learning. Routledge.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). Evaluating evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
Picciano, A. G. (2016). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 20(2), 16-27.
Sain, Z. H., & Serban, R. (2024). Navigating Blended Learning: Integrating Synchronous and Asynchronous Strategies for Educational Transformation. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Economics, Business, and Management, 3(8), 15-20. Retrieved from: https://gsarpublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/GJAHSS1852024-Gelary-script.pdf
Smith, A. N., DeGrazia, J. L., & Thompkins, M. E. (2020). Technology in education: A twenty-year review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(2), 197-219.
Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94.