Telaah Kritis Kebijakan Supervisi Pendidikan di Indonesia (UU No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, PP No. 19 Tahun 2005 dan Penggantinya tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan) Critical Review of Educational Supervision Policies in Indonesia (Law No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers, Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 and Its Successors on National Education Standards)

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Education is one of the fundamental pillars and an integral part of societal life, so every individual has an equal right to quality education. This study aimed to conduct a critical review of educational supervision policy in Indonesia by focusing the analysis on Law No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers and Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 on National Education Standards, along with their subsequent replacement regulations. Educational supervision is positioned as a principal pillar of instructional quality assurance; however, its implementation often encounters regulatory ambiguities and a paradigm shift from administrative inspection to professional mentoring. This study employed a qualitative method with a library research approach and content analysis of various relevant regulations and scholarly literature. The findings indicate that although Law No. 14 of 2005 has affirmed teachers’ status as professionals, policy synchronization in Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 (and its amendments up to Government Regulation No. 4 of 2022) still leaves overlapping roles between school supervisors and principals. The transformation of policy from the previous National Education Standards framework toward a new paradigm provides greater flexibility, but has not yet been fully accompanied by clear supervisory instruments that are adaptive to the demands of the digital era. This review concludes that strengthening educational supervision policy needs to be directed toward a collaborative clinical supervision model oriented to professional mentoring and meaningful learning, so that it does not merely stop at fulfilling administrative workload requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Prahani R.S.B.K. (2027)
    Problem-Based Learning Assisted by Physics Digital Pocket Book: Experimental Study to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Completed with Bibliometric Analysis toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 15-34
  2. Vu L.H. (2027)
    From trust and generational education to climate action: Global empirical evidence on shaping climate beliefs and policies
    Countries Studies, 5(1), 161-194
  3. Khasanah A.N. (2027)
    Self-Health Literacy Among Students in Islamic School Science Education: A Comparative Analysis Across Gender, Grade Level, and School Context
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 93-106

Article Details

How to Cite
Nasrullah, K. (2026). Telaah Kritis Kebijakan Supervisi Pendidikan di Indonesia (UU No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, PP No. 19 Tahun 2005 dan Penggantinya tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan). TSAQOFAH, 6(2), 2231-2246. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i2.8954

References

Anggraeni, R. (2019). Memaknai Fungsi UUD Secara Ideal dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 48(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.48.3.2019.283-293

Chudzaifah, I. (2019). Supervisi Pendidikan Islam: Telaah Model Pengawasan Madrasah di Kota Sorong. ALFIKR: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 18–30. https://jurnal-tarbiyah.iainsorong.ac.id/index.php/alfikr/article/view/23

Idris. (2020). Kajian Kebijakan Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru dan Dosen di Indonesia. Guru Tua: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 41–52. https://unisa-palu.e-journal.id/gurutua/article/view/57

Ishaq. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia (HPI). PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Kristiawan, M. (2019). Supervisi Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2005). https://jdih.bkn.go.id/common/dokumen/PP%20NOMOR%2019%20TAHUN%202005%40STANDAR%20NASIONAL%20PENDIDIKAN.pdf

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 57 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2021). https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Salinan%20PP%20Nomor%2057%20Tahun%202021.pdf

Raharjo, S. B., Handayani, M., Jauhari, M. R., & Fitri Juanita M. (2019). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan. Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/18037/1/Final_Cetak_13_SPMP.pdf

Sholikah. (2017). Akademika, 11(1).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. (2005).