Analisis Validitas E-LKPD Fluida Statis berbasis Dual Space Inquiry Framework dalam Menstimulasi Keterampilan Proses Sains Validity Analysis of E-LKPD on Static Fluids Based on the Dual Space Inquiry Framework for Stimulating Science Process Skills

Main Article Content

Nada Afriza
Fuja Novitra
Fatni Mufit
Rio Anshari

Abstract

The development of valid digital teaching materials is a key prerequisite for stimulating students’ science process skills in physics learning, particularly on static fluid topics for Phase F students at senior high schools/Islamic senior high schools (SMA/MA). This study aims to analyze the validity level of a Static Fluid E-Worksheet (E-LKPD) based on the Dual Space Inquiry Framework (DSIF) as a digital learning material designed to foster students’ science process skills. This Research and Development (R&D) study is limited to the validity phase and employs the ADDIE development model, encompassing the analysis, design, and development stages. Data were collected using expert validation sheets and analyzed with Aiken’s V formula. The validation process involved three expert validators in Physics Education who assessed six components: content feasibility, visual communication, instructional design, software utilization, DSIF stages, and indicators of science process skills. The analysis results show that all validity aspects obtained an average Aiken’s V value of 0.90, categorized as very valid. These findings indicate that the DSIF-based E-LKPD meets criteria of substantive accuracy, presentation quality, visual design, and pedagogical alignment, and is thus suitable for use as a digital teaching material in static fluid physics learning. The developed product has the potential to be used in inquiry-based learning and to support the enhancement of students’ science process skills; therefore, further studies are recommended to examine its practicality and effectiveness through direct implementation with students so that its impact and applicability in real learning contexts can be understood more comprehensively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  2. Yáñez-Flores K.A. (2026)
    Analysis and reflection regarding the Pearce Case: Scientific fraud
    Cogitare Enfermagem, 31
  3. Toscano Aznar L. (2026)
    Neurosyphilis: descriptive analysis of clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes
    Enfermedades Infecciosas Y Microbiologia Clinica, 44(8)

Article Details

How to Cite
Afriza, N., Novitra, F., Mufit, F., & Anshari, R. (2025). Analisis Validitas E-LKPD Fluida Statis berbasis Dual Space Inquiry Framework dalam Menstimulasi Keterampilan Proses Sains. TSAQOFAH, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.7962

References

Aksari, V., Budhi, W., & Hasanah, D. (2021). Pengembangan E-LKPD Fisika Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Gerak Lurus untuk Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v8i1.20210
Arsyad, A., et al. (2024). Pengaruh Penggunaan Bahan Ajar Digital Berbasis Pendekatan Ilmiah terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 45–55.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th ed.). Longman.
Boslaugh, S., & Watters, P. A. (2008). Statistics in a Nutshell: A Desktop Quick Reference. O’Reilly Media.
Damopolii, I., et al. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Inkuiri terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 150–160.
Feriyanti, R., et al. (2025). Implementasi Inquiry-Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Investigatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 25–33.
Jati, P., & Winarno, B. (2024). Instrumen Penilaian Kepraktisan Bahan Ajar Digital. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 8(1), 10–20.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.
Lestari, I. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Elektronik untuk Menunjang Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(2), 115–126.
Nggraini, S., et al. (2019). Model ADDIE dalam Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Digital. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran, 4(3), 60–68.
Novitra, F., et al. (2025). Design of Dual Space Inquiry Framework for Facilitating Flexible Learning in Digital Technology Era. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100424 (ResearchGate)
Nurlita, S. (2021). Peran E-LKPD dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Media Pendidikan, 5(2), 30–38.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Riduwan, & Sunarto. (2012). Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Bisnis. Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.