Ketepatan Alat Ukur dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan: Kajian Validitas Instrumen Accuracy of Measurement Tools in Educational Evaluation: A Study of Instrument Validity
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3875-3902
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.10951
Viewed: 69 times
Downloaded: 39 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Ariyanto Ariyanto1*, Achmad Rasyid Ridha2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although educational evaluation is an important component in determining the success of the learning process, the accuracy of evaluation results greatly depends on the quality of the measuring instrument used in the assessment process. Invalid instruments can produce inaccurate data, so evaluation results do not objectively reflect students’ abilities. This study aims to examine the accuracy of measuring instruments in educational evaluation from the perspective of instrument validity. This study used a library research method with a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were obtained from various literature sources in the form of books, scientific articles, and journals relevant to educational evaluation and instrument validity. The results of the review show that validity is the main determinant of the accuracy of educational evaluation results. Instruments that do not meet theoretical or empirical validity have the potential to cause assessment bias and errors in educational decision-making. Conversely, strengthening instrument validity can improve the objectivity, accuracy, and credibility of evaluation results. The conclusion of this study affirms that instrument validity is the main foundation for achieving the accuracy of measuring instruments in educational evaluation. These findings contribute to strengthening studies on educational measurement and provide practical implications for educators and instrument developers in preparing valid, objective, and accountable evaluation tools.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Lukpanov R.E. (2027)Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall BlockKompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
-
Sarkar R. (2027)EVALUATION OF UAV-ADMINISTERED INSECTICIDES AT DIFFERENT DOSES AGAINST BROWN PLANTHOPPER NILAPARVATA LUGENS (STAL)Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(2), 250-254
-
Irawati R. (2027)Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education contextMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 4). Pustaka Pelajar.
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). Harper Collins.
Djaali, & Muljono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Grasindo.
Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). Macmillan.
Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson.
Ridha, A. R., & Widyaningsih, E. (2025). Validitas Alat Ukur dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan: Kajian Konseptual tentang Jenis, Faktor Penentu, dan Implikasi Pengukuran. Tsaqofah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 60–620. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8310
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukardi. (2015). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Bumi Aksara.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Pustaka Pelajar.
Yuniarti, N., & Soenarto. (2016). Validitas Konstruk Instrumen Evaluasi Outcome Lembaga Pendidikan Guru Vokasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.8448