Evaluating Handover Processes in Mobile Networks: Effects on Latency, QoS, and User Experience Across Conditions

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The rapid expansion of mobile networks has revolutionized global communication, enabling seamless connectivity for a growing user base. As networks evolve, efficient handover processes—where mobile devices transition between network cells or base stations—are critical to maintaining uninterrupted service. Poorly optimized handovers can result in increased latency, degraded Quality of Service (QoS), and diminished user experience, especially in advanced networks like 5G that demand low latency and high reliability. This study examines the impact of handover processes on key performance metrics such as latency, QoS, and user satisfaction, analyzing their behavior across urban, rural, and heterogeneous technological environments. In densely populated urban areas, frequent handovers risk creating performance bottlenecks, while rural areas face challenges related to sparse infrastructure. Heterogeneous environments, where legacy and next-generation technologies coexist, further complicate efficient transitions. By identifying these challenges, the study proposes strategies to optimize handover efficiency, ensuring seamless connectivity, enhanced QoS, and reduced latency in advanced networks. These findings contribute to improving mobile communication systems, addressing the dynamic demands of 5G and beyond in diverse operational scenarios.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Naemi Z. (2027)
    The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing Curriculum
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
  2. Jam B. (2027)
    An Optimality-Theoretic Account of Total Nasal Place/Manner Assimilation in the Recitation of the Holy Qur’an
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 139-166
  3. Madaminov D.Q. (2027)
    Physicochemical Analysis of Water-Soluble Sodium Silicate Obtained from Modified Raw Materials
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 128-135

Article Details

How to Cite
Abdurrahman, M., Gamawa, M. A., Abdulkadir, A., M, B. A., Hamza, J. B., & Ahmed, A. (2025). Evaluating Handover Processes in Mobile Networks: Effects on Latency, QoS, and User Experience Across Conditions. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 3(1), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v3i1.4631

References

Ahmed, A. A., and Alzahrani, A. A. (2019). A comprehensive survey of handover management for vehicular ad hoc networks based on 5G mobile networks technology. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 30(3), e3546.

Abraham, J., Kannampallil, T., and Patel, V. L. (2014). A systematic review of the literature concerning the evaluation of handoff tools: implications for research and practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(1), 154-162.

Fotouhi, H., Alves, M., Zamalloa, M. Z., and Koubâa, A. (2014). Reliable and expedited handoffs in low-power wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(11), 2620-2633.

Li, Y., Cao, B., and Wang, C. (2016). Handover schemes in heterogeneous LTE networks: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(2), 112-117.

Mardis, M., Davis, J., Benningfield, B., Elliott, C., Youngstrom, M., Nelson, B., et al. (2017). The effects of shift-to-shift handoffs on patient safety and outcomes: a systematic review. American Journal of Medical Quality, 32(1), 34-42.

Martin, G., Khajuria, A., Arora, S., King, D., Ashrafian, H., and Darzi, A. (2019). The impact of mobile technology on teamwork and communication within hospitals: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(4), 339-355.

Özkoç, M. F., Koutsaftis, A., Kumar, R., Liu, P., and Panwar, S. S. (2021). The impact of multi-connectivity and handover constraints on millimeter-wave and terahertz cellular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 39(6), 1833-1853.

Ouali, K., Kassar, M., and Sethom, K. (2018). Handover performance analysis for managing device-to-device mobility in 5G cellular networks. IET Communications, 12(15), 1925-1936.

Palas, M. R., Islam, M. R., Roy, P., Razzaque, M. A., Alsanad, A., AlQahtani, S. A., and Hassan, M. M. (2021). Multi-criteria handover mobility management in 5G cellular networks. Computer Communications, 174, 81-91.

Shayea, I., Dushi, P., Banafaa, M., Rashid, R. A., Ali, S., Sarijari, M. A., et al. (2022). Handover management for drones within future mobile networks: a comprehensive survey. Sensors, 22(17), 6424.

Sönmez, Ş., Shayea, I., Khan, S. A., and Alhammadi, A. (2020). Handover management for next-generation wireless networks: a succinct overview. 2020 IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications Conference (MTTW), 1, 35-40.

Souza, D. D. S., Vieira, R. F., Seruffo, M. C. D. R., and Cardoso, D. L. (2019). A novel heuristic for prioritizing handover in mobile heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access, 8, 4043-4050.

Sun, Y., Feng, G., Qin, S., Liang, Y. C., and Yum, T. S. P. (2017). The SMART handoff policy for millimeter-wave heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 17(6), 1456-1468.

Tayyab, M., Gelabert, X., and Jäntti, R. (2019). A survey of handover management: spanning from LTE to NR. IEEE Access, 7, 118907-118930.

Vasudeva, K., Simsek, M., López-Pérez, D., and Güvenç, I. (2016). An analysis of handover failures in heterogeneous networks under fading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(7), 6060-6074.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)