Students' Perceptions on the Development of the ZEP Quiz as an Innovative Formative Assessment Tool in the “Grammar for TOEFL” Course
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mastery of grammar is a crucial component of students’ success on the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL); however, grammar assessment that is still largely conducted through conventional methods may increase anxiety and reduce student engagement. ZEP Quiz, a metaverse-based assessment platform, integrates gamification, virtual avatars, competition, and immediate feedback into the evaluation process. This study aims to investigate students’ perceptions of using ZEP Quiz as an innovative formative assessment tool in the Grammar for TOEFL course. A descriptive quantitative survey design was employed, involving 30 students from the English Language Education Program at Padang State University. Data were collected using a 30-item questionnaire based on a four-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings indicate that students demonstrated a very positive perception of ZEP Quiz, with a grand mean score of 3.36. The enjoyment dimension received the highest score (M = 3.50), followed by motivation (M = 3.39) and overall perception (M = 3.38). These findings suggest that ZEP Quiz can enhance students’ enjoyment and motivation in grammar assessment by providing an interactive, gamified, and feedback-oriented learning environment. This study concludes that ZEP Quiz has the potential to serve as an innovative formative assessment alternative for supporting Grammar for TOEFL learning in higher education. The findings contribute to the development of technology-enhanced language assessment and provide practical implications for lecturers in designing more engaging, interactive, and student-centered grammar assessment practices.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Amnouychokanant, V. (2025). Reducing anxiety among EFL learners through gamification: An empirical study of instructional impact. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 80–104. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.5
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Chan, S., & Lo, N. (2024). Enhancing EFL/ESL instruction through gamification: A comprehensive review of empirical evidence. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1395155. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1395155
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
España-Delgado, J. A. (2023). Kahoot, Quizizz, and Quizalize in the English class and their impact on motivation. HOW, 30(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641
Fraenkel, P. (2019). Love in action: An integrative approach to last chance couple therapy. Family Process, 58(3), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12474
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
George, D., & Mallery, P. (1999). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
Koç, G., & Sütçü, S. S. (2023). The impact of gamification on secondary school students’ grammar proficiency. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.525.2
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Luthfiyyah, R., Aisyah, A., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2021). Technology-enhanced formative assessment in higher education: A voice from Indonesian EFL teachers. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 6(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.6.1.42-54
Shen, Z., Lai, M., & Wang, F. (2024). Investigating the influence of gamification on motivation and learning outcomes in online language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1295709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295709
Taufiqulloh, T., Nindya, M. A., & Rosdiana, I. (2023). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: Unraveling Indonesian EFL learners’ voices. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 981–990. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.9076
Temel, T., & Cesur, K. (2024). The effect of gamification with Web 2.0 tools on EFL learners’ motivation and academic achievement in online learning environments. Sage Open, 14(2), Article 21582440241247928. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241247928
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Yao, L., & Liu, Y. (2025). Emotional multifaceted feedback on AI tool use in EFL learning initiation: Chain-mediated effects of motivation and metacognitive strategies in an optimized TAM model. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.18180
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
Zhang, S., & Hasim, Z. (2023). Gamification in EFL/ESL instruction: A systematic review of empirical research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1030790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030790
Zhang, Z., & Crawford, J. (2024). EFL learners’ motivation in a gamified formative assessment: The case of Quizizz. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 6217–6239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12015-0




















