A Comparison of Students' Critical Thinking Skills Based on Assessment Techniques in Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS)

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Critical thinking is a fundamental competency in Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) learning; however, school-based assessment practices remain dominated by conventional techniques that primarily measure learning outcomes and provide limited insight into students’ thinking processes. This study aimed to compare the critical thinking skills of students assessed through authentic and conventional assessment techniques and to determine whether the two approaches produced significantly different outcomes. A quantitative quasi-experimental approach with a nonequivalent control group design was employed. The sample comprised 68 students, including 35 students in the experimental group and 33 students in the control group. Data were collected using an essay-based critical thinking test developed according to the FRISCO indicators: Focus, Reason, Inference, Situation, Clarity, and Overview. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality and homogeneity tests, N-Gain analysis, and an independent-samples t test. The findings showed that the experimental group achieved a higher mean posttest score than the control group (73.94 vs. 63.00). The data met the assumptions of normality (p > .05) and homogeneity (p = .236), while the independent-samples t test revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, t = 4.430, p < .001. The N-Gain analysis also indicated greater improvement among students assessed through authentic assessment than among those assessed through conventional assessment. These findings demonstrate that authentic assessment is more effective in supporting the development of students’ critical thinking skills in IPAS learning. This study contributes practical evidence that assessment practices incorporating process-oriented and performance-based tasks can provide a more comprehensive measure of students’ reasoning and strengthen the integration of critical thinking into elementary science and social science instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Begzhanova G.B. (2027)
    Study of the suitability of industrial raw material resources as additives for Portland cement
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 71-82
  2. Toshov J.B. (2027)
    Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Models of Drilling in Heterogeneous Geological Sections
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 60-70
  3. Mussin R.A. (2027)
    Redistribution of rock pressure and deformation of the rock mass in the Karaganda coal basin
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 36-48

Article Details

How to Cite
Mukhlisa, N., Halik, A., & Astuty, F. A. (2026). A Comparison of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Assessment Techniques in Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS). Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 4604-4616. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11529

References

Achmad, G. H., Ratnasari, D., Amin, A., Yuliani, E., & Liandara, N. (2022). Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5685–5699. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3280

Afrizal, S. R. (2022). Analisis Pelaksanaan Asesmen Autentik dan Berpikir Kritis Selama Pembelajaran Daring. Educatoria: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(4), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.36312/ejiip.v2i4.130

Aini, L. N., Karsono, & Kamsiyati, S. (2023). Penerapan Prinsip Authentic Assessment pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 11(5), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v11i5.77082

Anggraeni, N., Rustini, T., & Wahyuningsih, Y. (2022). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar pada Mata Pelajaran IPS di Kelas Tinggi. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v8n1.p84-90

Angkat, S. A., Wardhani, S., & Syahrial. (2024). Konsep Penilaian Autentik dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Pubmedia Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Indonesia, 1(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v1i3.432

Arsita, S. I. P., & Fathoni, A. (2022). Analisis Faktor Hambatan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Authentic Assesment di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6605–6612. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3319

Cholifah, N., Atmoko, A., Bustamam, M., & Kusumaningrum, S. R. (2024). Authentic assessment techniques in IPAS learning in elementary school: A case study. Jurnal Paedagogy, 11(2), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i2.11198

Dewi, A. S., Rusilowati, A., Sumarni, W., Mufid, A., & Naim, K. (2023). Analysis of elementary school students’ critical thinking skills in the subjects of natural science and social studies. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi, 10(3), 1167–1180. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v10i3.953

Faizah, A., Susanti, D. T., Amalia, R., & Apriansyah, A. H. (2025). Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Mengimplementasikan Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum Merdeka di TK Keledang. Early Childhood Journal, 5(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.30872/ecj.v5i1.4540

Gumala, Y., Yohamintin, Farhana, H., Syaodih, E., & Samsudin, A. (2024). Development of an instrument to asses critical thinking skills for elementary school students on energy topics. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 1725–1734. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i2.5442

Haryanti, Y. D., Sapriya, Permana, J., Syaodih, E. W., & Kurino, Y. D. (2022). Improving the critical thinking skills of elementary school students through problem-based learning and inquiry models in social science learning. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 9(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v9i2.10485

Himmah, E. F., Astutik, S., & Aristya, P. D. (2024). Development of HTML5-based mobile learning media to enhance critical thinking skills of elementary school students in IPAS learning. Jurnal Paedagogy, 11(4), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i4.13065

Jupri, T., Tinus, A., & Wurianto, A. B. (2025). Developing critical thinking through HOTS-based authentic assessment in economics. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 26(3). https://ijins.umsida.ac.id/index.php/ijins/article/view/1453

Khasanah, A., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Otentik Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpf.v10i2.11112

Kumala, F. N., Yasa, A. D., Hakim, A. R., & Salimi, M. (2025). Analysis of computational and critical thinking skills in elementary school science students. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.21067/jbpd.v9i1.11804

Lailiyah, S., Faradita, M. N., & Wahyuni, H. I. (2025). Analisis Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran IPAS di SD. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.23204

Lestari, H. D., Rahmawati, Y., & Usman, H. (2024). STEM-PjBL learning model to enhance critical thinking skills of students on magnets, electricity, and technology. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 6027–6037. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.8153

Martatiyana, D. R., & Madani, F. (2023). Penerapan Asesmen Autentik dalam Praktikum IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(4), 1741–1760. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v6i4.7291

Martatiyana, D. R., & Madani, F. (2024). Applying authentic assessment in elementary science practicum: A literature review. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v12i1.66773

Pratiwi, N. N., Rasiman, Z., Munaldus, & Fitriawan, D. (2026). Developing technology-enhanced authentic assessment instruments to measure students’ non-cognitive critical thinking dispositions. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v17i1.29369

Rahmaniati, R., & Aulia, N. (2025). Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan IPA. Anterior Jurnal, 24(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v24i1.9155

Sulistyo, R. E., Sumarno, & Purnamasari, I. (2023). Pengembangan Asesmen Autentik dengan Pendekatan Saintifik pada Pembelajaran Tematik untuk Mengukur Dimensi Bernalar Kritis Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Cendekiawan, 5(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.35438/cendekiawan.v5i1.316

Susanti, N. I., Rozy, F. S., Munawaroh, L., Alfiyah, A. S., & Dewantari, V. A. (2025). Analisis Tingkat Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS. DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan, 31(2), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i2.9847

Triansyah, F. A., Suwatno, & Supardi, E. (2023). Fokus Penelitian Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi: Bibliometrik Analisis 2019–2023. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 6(1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.29407/jsp.v6i1.226

Umam, A., Rahmawanti, M. R., Jaelani, A., & Lisdawati, L. (2024). Does authentic assessment promote critical thinking? Experience of two EFL teachers in Indonesia. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 13(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i1.12993