Prevalensi Avian Influenza pada Itik Mojosari di Kabupaten Solok Berdasarkan Deteksi Influenza A qRT-PCR Prevalence of Avian Influenza in Mojosari Ducks in Solok Regency Based on Influenza A qRT-PCR Detection
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
401-410
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/masaliq.v6i1.8872
Viewed: 215 times
Downloaded: 119 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Muhammad Kamil1*, Yulia Yellita2, Bayu Rachman3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although Avian Influenza (AI) has been widely reported as a strategic poultry disease in Indonesia, studies that specifically document AI occurrence based on molecular detection in traditionally raised Mojosari ducks remain relatively limited, particularly in major duck-producing areas in West Sumatra. This study aimed to analyze the occurrence of Avian Influenza in Mojosari ducks in Nagari Cupak, Gunung Talang Subdistrict, Solok Regency, as a basis for strengthening poultry disease control. A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design was employed, involving 50 Mojosari ducks purposively selected from smallholder farms. Data were obtained through laboratory examination using the Influenza A quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) method and were analyzed by calculating prevalence, 95% confidence intervals using the exact binomial method, and a proportion test to assess differences in infection occurrence. The results showed that 90.0% of ducks tested positive for Avian Influenza, with an estimated prevalence of 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2–97.4%), and the difference in proportions between positive and negative ducks was significant (p < 0.001). This high level of occurrence indicates active viral circulation associated with the characteristics of the aquatic agroecosystem, low biosecurity implementation, and traditional systems of duck husbandry and movement. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening laboratory-based surveillance, enhancing biosecurity in smallholder farms, and intensifying control of poultry movement, and they provide practical implications for stakeholders in AI control based on a One Health approach, while also opening opportunities for further studies on environmental and management-related risk factors in duck production.
Keywords: Avian Influenza; Mojosari Ducks; qRT-PCR; Prevalence; Veterinary Epidemiology
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alasiri, A., Soltane, R., Hegazy, A., Khalil, A. M., Mahmoud, S. H., Khalil, A. A., Martinez-Sobrido, L., & Mostafa, A. (2023). Vaccination and antiviral treatment against avian influenza H5Nx viruses: A harbinger of virus control or evolution. Vaccines, 11(11), 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11111628
Almeida, R., Luiza, V. L., Antonio, J., Bermudez, Z., & Cristina, M. (2025). The One Health approach to face bacterial resistance to antibiotics in livestock production. Saude Em Debate
Badra, R., Zhang, W., Tam, J. S. L., Webby, R., van der Werf, S., Nikisins, S., Cullinane, A., Gharaibeh, S., Njouom, R., Peiris, M., Kayali, G., & Heraud, J. (2025). Transmission pathways of zoonotic influenza viruses and influencing factors: A systematic review of recent findings. Viruses, 17(6), 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17060857
Chen, H., Yuan, H., Gao, R., Zhang, J., Wang, D., Xiong, Y., Fan, G., Yang, F., Li, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of a fatal case of avian influenza A(H10N8) virus infection: A descriptive study. The Lancet, 383(9918), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60111-2
Danasekaran, R. (2024). One Health: A holistic approach to tackling global health issues. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 49(2), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_521_23
Deng, G., Tan, D., Shi, J., Cui, P., Jiang, Y., Liu, L., Tian, G., & Kawaoka, Y. (2013). Complex reassortment of multiple subtypes of avian influenza viruses in domestic ducks at the Dongting Lake region of China. Journal of Virology, 87(17), 9452–9462. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00776-13
Destoumieux-Garzón, D. (2018). The One Health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00014
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & World Organisation for Animal Health. (2024). Global strategy for the prevention and control of high pathogenicity avian influenza (2024–2033): Achieving sustainable, resilient poultry production systems. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/4c4f4834-f7a2-4b1a-a15c-7f4e54d3fa61
Fournié, G., Tripodi, A., Thanh, T., Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, V. T. (2016). Investigating poultry trade patterns to guide avian influenza surveillance and control: A case study in Vietnam. Scientific Reports, 6, 29463. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29463
Gilbert, M., Xiao, X., Chaitaweesub, P., Kalpravidh, W., Premashthira, S., Boles, S., & Slingenbergh, J. (2007). Avian influenza, domestic ducks and rice agriculture in Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 119(3–4), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.001
Hautefeuille, C., Dauphin, G., & Peyre, M. (2020). Knowledge and remaining gaps on the role of animal and human movements in the poultry production and trade networks in the global spread of avian influenza viruses – A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 15(3), e0230567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230567
Indriani, R., Samaan, G., Gultom, A., Loth, L., Irianti, S., Adjid, R., Luh, N., Indi, P., Weaver, J., Mumford, E., Lokuge, K., & Kelly, P. M. (2010). Environmental sampling for avian influenza virus A (H5N1) in live-bird markets, Indonesia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 16(12), 1889–1895. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1612.100402
Islam, A., Ara, T., Amin, E., Islam, S., Sayeed, A., Shirin, T., Hassan, M. M., Klaassen, M., & Epstein, J. H. (2023). Epidemiology and evolutionary dynamics of high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in Bangladesh. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Keawcharoen, J., van Riel, D., van Amerongen, G., Bestebroer, T., & Beyer, W. E. (2008). Wild ducks as long-distance vectors of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1). Emerging Infectious Diseases, 14(4), 600–607
Lycett, S. J., Duchatel, F., & Digard, P. (2019). A brief history of bird flu. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1775), 20180257. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0257
Mostafa, A., Abdelwhab, E. M., Mettenleiter, T. C., & Pleschka, S. (2018). Zoonotic potential of influenza A viruses: A comprehensive overview. Viruses, 10(9), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10090497
Ninyio, N. N., Ho, K. L., Omar, A. R., Tan, W. S., Iqbal, M., & Mariatulqabtiah, A. R. (2020). Virus-like particle vaccines: A prospective panacea against an avian influenza panzootic. Vaccines, 8(4), 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040694
Rahman, M., Der, N. H., Chowdhury, S., Balish, A., Zaman, R. U., Nasreen, S., Das, B. C., Azziz-Baumgartner, E., Sturm-Ramirez, K., Davis, C. T., Donis, R. O., & Luby, S. P. (2018). Avian influenza surveillance in domestic waterfowl and environment of live bird markets in Bangladesh. Scientific Reports, 8, 9396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27515-w
Rushton, J., Viscarra, R., Bleich, E. G., & McLeod, A. (2005). Impact of avian influenza outbreaks in the poultry sectors of five South East Asian countries (Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Thailand, Viet Nam) outbreak costs, responses and potential long term control. World's Poultry Science Journal, 61(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200570
Spackman, E., Jones, D. R., McCoig, A. M., Colonius, T. J., Goraichuk, I. V., & Suarez, D. L. (2024). Characterization of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in retail dairy products in the U.S. Journal of Virology, 98(7), e00881-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00881-24
Swayne, D. E. (2012). Impact of vaccines and vaccination on global control of avian influenza. Avian Diseases, 56(4 Suppl), 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1637/10183-041012-Review.1
van Kerkhove, M. D., Mumford, E., Mounts, A. W., Bresee, J., Ly, S., Bridges, C. B., & Otte, J. (2011). Highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1): Pathways of exposure at the animal-human interface, a systematic review. PLOS ONE, 6(1), e14582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014582
Webster, R. G., & Govorkova, E. A. (2014). Continuing challenges in influenza. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1323(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12462