Validasi Instrumen Angket Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMA pada Materi Stoikiometri Validation of the Questionnaire Instrument on Factors Causing Learning Difficulties among SMA Students in Stoichiometry

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Learning difficulties in stoichiometry are still widely experienced by senior high school students because the subject requires the integration of conceptual understanding of chemistry and mathematical calculation skills, while also serving as an important foundation for mastering subsequent chemistry topics. This condition indicates the need for an instrument capable of systematically and measurably identifying the factors that cause students’ learning difficulties. This study aimed to develop a valid questionnaire instrument to identify the factors causing senior high school students’ learning difficulties in stoichiometry. The study employed a research and development method based on DeVellis’s (2017) instrument development model. The development process comprised five stages: determining the construct to be measured, developing a pool of statement items, determining the measurement format, conducting expert reviews of the items, and considering the validation results. The content validity of the instrument was analyzed using Aiken’s V index involving five validators. The results showed that the developed instrument obtained a mean Aiken’s V value of 0.842 and was therefore considered to have adequate content validity. Of the initial 83 statement items, 31 items were retained after undergoing a selection and revision process based on feedback from the validators. This study concludes that the developed instrument is valid as an initial draft for identifying the factors causing students’ learning difficulties in stoichiometry. The instrument may serve as a basis for further research involving empirical validity and reliability testing before being used more widely.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Jafree A.I. (2026)
    Translation and Linguistic Analysis of The North Wind and the Sun in Standard Malay: An Instrument for Malaysian Speech Research
    Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 26(2), 383-403
  2. Marinangeli A. (2026)
    A Portable D-Shaped POF-SPR Sensor Integrated with NanoMIPs for High-Affinity Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD Protein
    Applied Sciences Switzerland, 16(4)
  3. Mokti K. (2026)
    Prevalence of Fall among Elderly in Rural Sabah and Its Associated Factors
    Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 29(1), 33-42

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahmi, P. M., & Fitri, B. Y. (2026). Validasi Instrumen Angket Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMA pada Materi Stoikiometri. MASALIQ, 6(4), 1987-2002. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v6i4.11269

References

Allo, A. B., & Azrun, M. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Kesulitan Belajar Kimia pada Materi Stoikiometri Kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Manokwari. Arfak Chem: Chemistry Education Journal, 6(2), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.30862/accej.v6i2.554

Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066

Andani, D. T., & Yulian, M. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Electronic Book Menggunakan Software Kvisoft Flipbook pada Materi Hukum Dasar Kimia di SMA Negeri 1 Panton Reu Aceh Barat. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v2i1.10730

Astafani, A., Resmawati, R. F., & Hakim, M. E. L. (2024). Systematic Review: Faktor-Faktor Kesulitan Belajar Materi Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 18(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/qm1ym619

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darimi, I. (2016). Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Aktif di Sekolah. JURNAL EDUKASI: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 2(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.22373/je.v2i1.689

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fernández-Gómez, E., Martín-Salvador, A., Luque-Vara, T., Sánchez-Ojeda, M. A., Navarro-Prado, S., & Enrique-Mirón, C. (2020). Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients, 12(4), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041136

Kam, C. C. S. (2016). Further considerations in using items with diverse content to measure acquiescence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415586831

Lambert, L. S., & Newman, D. A. (2023). Construct development and validation in three practical steps: Recommendations for reviewers, editors, and authors. Organizational Research Methods, 26(4), 574–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221115374

Mabruria, A. (2021). Konsep Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Muhafadzah: Jurnal Ilmiah Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam, 1(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.53888/muhafadzah.v1i2.429

Muderawan, I. W., Wiratma, I. G. L., & Nabila, M. Z. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v3i1.20944

Norjana, R., Santosa, & Joharmawan, R. (2016). Identifikasi Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia dan Penerapannya dalam Stoikiometri pada Siswa Kelas X IPA di MAN 3 Malang. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 1(2), 42–49. https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/j-pek/article/view/768

Pepteti, S., & Latisma. (2022). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Kelas XI MIPA SMAN 2 Solok Selatan pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(3), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i3.629

Qorinallah, S., & Bahriah, E. S. (2025). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Materi Stoikiometri. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.64277/semnas.v2i1.195

Rahmat, P. S. (2018). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Rohmad, & Sarah, S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Angket. K-Media.

Sakti, L. E., & Ulianas, A. (2018). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMA pada Materi Stoikiometri. Journal of RESIDU, 2(10), 16–26.

Sariati, N. K., Suardana, I. N., & Wiratini, N. M. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas XI pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i1.15469

Sugihartono, Fathiyah, K. N., Setiawati, F. A., Harahap, F., & Nurhayati, S. R. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. UNY Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tajuddin, N. I. I., Abas, U.-H., Aziz, K. A., Nor, R. N. H., Izni, N. A., Sudin, M. N., Mohd Anim, N. A. H., & Md Noor, N. (2025). Content validity assessment using Aiken’s V: Knowledge integration model for blockchain in higher learning institutions. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 16(6), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160659

Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Nieswandt, M. (2000). Sources of students’ difficulties in learning chemistry. Educación Química, 11(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2000.2.66458

Zakiyah, Ibnu, S., & Subandi. (2018). Analisis Dampak Kesulitan Siswa pada Materi Stoikiometri terhadap Hasil Belajar Termokimia dan Upaya Menguranginya dengan Metode Pemecahan Masalah. EduChemia: Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i1.1784


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.