Analisis Tingkat Efektivitas Program Subsidi Pupuk dari Pemerintah terhadap Pendapatan Petani Padi di Desa Simaninggir Kecamatan Sipirok Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan Analysis of the Effectiveness Level of the Government Fertilizer Subsidy Program on the Income of Rice Farmers in Simaninggir Village, Sipirok District, South Tapanuli Regency
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1576-1592
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9654
Viewed: 60 times
Downloaded: 38 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Nur Patima Siregar1*, Rusydi Fauzan2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The effectiveness of fertilizer subsidy programs has become a concern in various studies, but research that specifically discusses the relationship between the effectiveness of fertilizer distribution based on the six-right indicators (6T) and changes in farmers’ income at the micro level remains limited. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the government’s fertilizer subsidy program on the income of rice farmers in Simaninggir Village, Sipirok Subdistrict, South Tapanuli Regency. This study employed a qualitative approach with a field research design, involving rice farmers receiving subsidized fertilizer who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through structured interviews and documentation, and were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively based on the six-right indicators (6T). The results showed that the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program had not been fully optimal, with the right type and right place indicators falling into the very effective category, right price in the effective category, right time and right quality in the moderately effective category, and right quantity in the ineffective category. In addition, the findings revealed an average decrease in farmers’ income of 1.19%, an increase in production costs of 3.28%, and a decline in profit of 2.50% during the 2024–2025 period. These findings indicate that the accuracy of the quantity and timing of fertilizer distribution plays an important role in supporting the success of the fertilizer subsidy program and improving farmers’ welfare. The conclusion of this study affirms the need to improve the distribution system of subsidized fertilizer so that its implementation becomes more effective, while also contributing theoretically to studies of agricultural policy and farm economics and providing practical implications for the government and stakeholders in improving the effectiveness of the fertilizer subsidy program.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Arisandi, D. (2016). Analisis Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 7(2), 101–115.
Ayatulloh, M. (2020). Efektivitas Program Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Teori Campbell. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 11(1), 23–35.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Indonesia 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/18018f9896f09f03580a614b/statistik-indonesia-2023.html
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Farhan, M. (2020). Analisis Pendapatan Usahatani dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Pertanian. Jurnal Agribisnis, 9(2), 67–78.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). The state of food and agriculture 2021: Making agrifood systems more resilient to shocks and stresses. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cb4476en
Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Sage Publications.
Ismail, R. (2023). Evaluasi Distribusi Pupuk Bersubsidi di Indonesia. Jurnal Agraria, 15(1), 89–102.
Kamarudin, A. (2021). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Jurnal Manajemen, 13(2), 145–158.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Informasi APBN 2023. https://media.kemenkeu.go.id/getmedia/6439fa59-B28e-412d-adf5-e02fdd9e7f68/informasi-apbn-ta-2023.pdf
Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2022). Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian Nasional.
Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2023). Petunjuk Teknis Pengelolaan Pupuk Bersubsidi TA 2023. https://psp.pertanian.go.id/pedoman/petunjuk-teknis-pengelolaan-pupuk-bersubsidi-ta-2023
Kumalasari, D., & Kusmiati, E. (2023). Analisis Efektivitas Distribusi Pupuk Bersubsidi Berdasarkan Prinsip 6T. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 11(2), 120–135.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyadiana, A. (2017). Efektivitas Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 8(1), 55–70.
Neuman, W. L. (2020). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (8th ed.). Pearson.
Nugroho, R., et al. (2022). Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk dan Dampaknya terhadap Petani. Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanian, 10(2), 200–215.
Pakpahan, M. (2025). Dampak Subsidi Pupuk terhadap Produksi Pertanian. Jurnal Agrikultura, 14(1), 77–90.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Prasetyo, A., & Huda, N. (2021). Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Padi. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 9(2), 150–165.
Rahman, A. (2020). Perspektif Islam dalam Pembangunan Pertanian. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 11(1), 33–47.
Rangkuti, F. (2018). Analisis SWOT: Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis. Gramedia.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryana, A. (2021). Tantangan Sektor Pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal Agribisnis, 13(1), 10–25.
Susilowati, S. H. (2019). Struktur Usaha Tani di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 37(2), 123–135.
World Bank. (2022). Agriculture and food: What we do. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/agriculture-and-food-what-we-do
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.